Content on Gold Hoarding.

1. BY Laws (Tax Laws)

2. By In-Laws (Max Gifting)

3. By Religions (Faux Glorification Lakshmi Gold Puja)

4. By Industry (Women Targetted Marketing)

#GynoCentrism #GenderedMaterialism

According to the income tax laws of India, married women are allowed to keep up to 500 grams of gold, while unmarried women are allowed to keep up to 250 grams of gold. In comparison, men are limited to only 100 grams of gold. 

https://looknewsindia.com/indian-women-own-11-of-global-gold-read-full-report/

Towns Of Gold-Diggers (KGF Kolar Gold Fields) is in Karnataka.

Same Place where Ranya Rao a kannada film actress got arrested for Smuggling Gold.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/ranya-rao-gold-smuggling-case-karnataka-govt-orders-probe-into-airport-protocol-violation-role-of-actors-dgp-father-under-scanner/ar-AA1AFiQQ

https://thedailyguardian.com/business/gold-ownership-indian-women-hold-24000-tons-representing-11-of-the-worlds-gold/

https://arynews.tv/this-country-holds-more-gold-than-world-top-countries-reports/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/fashion/luxury/cover-story/indian-women-hold-11-of-the-worlds-gold-read-complete-report/articleshow/116435306.cms

Our Choices, Decide our Virtues or Vices.

First important is How one chooses(Methods), Who(Choosers) and Whats Choice (Choosen).

Bro, appreciate the research ur doing to understand the situation.. plz document in a blog.. msg says biggest mistake “is marrying someone choosen by parents”.. well many have not done and love marriages also have issues.

also have a perspective on mistake in marital selection.. the insight i have is mistake is not *WHO* makes Selection whether Parents or Partners, relatives, brokers etc(People).. But *”HOW”* each  selection is made..(Process).  the faults lie in the unoptimized *Marital Selection Process* this needs improvement.

My parents and maybe others of their era marriages was done with the India Method.  thus its 40 years succesful marriage with their parents blessings..

S243: “InDiA_Method”of S’election & Decisive_Decisions:  Q1. How to Choose the Right Person for the Right Placement?

many marriages that follow these cultural methods are safer, others that deviate may suffer.

Psychological Warfare Targeting Women and Gender Fault Lines on the Modern Internet

The internet has become a battleground for psychological warfare, with women and gender fault lines being increasingly targeted. This phenomenon is characterized by the use of manipulative and deceptive tactics to influence individuals’ perceptions, emotions, and behaviors.

Tactics Used to Target Women and Gender Fault Lines

1. Misogynistic Online Harassment: Women are disproportionately targeted by online harassment, which can include threats, hate speech, and sexualized violence. This can lead to feelings of fear, anxiety, and self-doubt.
2. Gendered Disinformation: False or misleading information is spread online to manipulate public opinion and reinforce harmful gender stereotypes. This can include conspiracy theories about feminism, gender identity, or reproductive rights.
3. Emotional Manipulation: Tactics like gaslighting, love bombing, and emotional blackmail are used to control and manipulate individuals’ emotions, often targeting women’s emotional labor and empathy.
4. Stereotyping and Shaming: Women are shamed and stereotyped online for their appearance, choices, or identities. This can lead to internalized misogyny and self-doubt.
5. Deepfakes and AI-Generated Content: AI-generated content, such as deepfakes, is used to create and disseminate false or misleading information, often targeting women’s bodies and identities.

Real-World Implications

1. Erosion of Trust: Psychological warfare tactics can erode trust in institutions, communities, and individuals, particularly among women and marginalized groups.
2. Increased Polarization: The spread of disinformation and propaganda can exacerbate existing social divisions, leading to increased polarization and conflict.
3. Mental Health Impacts: The constant exposure to online harassment, disinformation, and emotional manipulation can have severe mental health impacts, including anxiety, depression, and PTSD.

Mitigation Strategies

1. Critical Thinking and Media Literacy: Educate individuals on how to critically evaluate online information and identify manipulative tactics.
2. Online Community Building: Foster online communities that promote inclusivity, respect, and empathy, providing a safe space for women and marginalized groups.
3. Policy and Regulatory Frameworks: Develop and enforce policies and regulations that address online harassment, disinformation, and hate speech.
4. Support and Resources: Provide accessible support and resources for individuals affected by psychological warfare tactics, including mental health services and online safety guides.

Conclusion

Psychological warfare targeting women and gender fault lines on the modern internet is a pressing concern. By understanding the tactics used and the real-world implications, we can develop effective mitigation strategies to promote a safer and more inclusive online environment.

References:

1. “The Psychology of Online Harassment” by Jaime E. Settle and Kevin M. Kniffin: A study on the psychological impacts of online harassment.
2. “Gender and the Internet” by the United Nations: A report on the intersection of gender and the internet.
3. “Deepfakes and Disinformation” by the Brookings Institution: A report on the implications of deepfakes and AI-generated content on democracy and society.

How to identify Radicalization Recruitment, malice, deception, lies & illusions created by fraudsters, liars, deceivers, cheats, criminals etc ??

Identifying radicalization, recruitment, and malicious activities requires a combination of critical thinking, awareness, and knowledge. Here are some strategies to help you recognize these threats:

Radicalization and Recruitment

1. Extremist ideologies: Be cautious of individuals or groups promoting extremist views, such as hatred, violence, or superiority of one group over others.
2. Emotional manipulation: Watch for appeals to emotions, such as fear, anger, or a sense of victimhood, to recruit or radicalize individuals.
3. Isolation and exclusivity: Be wary of groups or individuals who isolate others from their families, friends, or communities, or promote exclusivity.
4. Charismatic leaders: Be cautious of charismatic leaders who use their charm and authority to manipulate and control others.

Malice, Deception, and Lies

1. Inconsistencies and contradictions: Watch for inconsistencies in stories, statements, or behaviors.
2. Emotional manipulation: Be aware of attempts to manipulate emotions, such as guilt-tripping, gaslighting, or playing on fears.
3. Lack of transparency: Be cautious of individuals or groups who are secretive or evasive about their intentions, goals, or activities.
4. Deflection and diversion: Watch for attempts to deflect or divert attention from the issue at hand.

Illusions and Deception

1. False narratives: Be aware of false or misleading narratives that create a distorted view of reality.
2. Confirmation bias: Be cautious of individuals or groups who selectively present information that confirms their biases.
3. Emotional appeals: Watch for appeals to emotions rather than logic and evidence.
4. Lack of evidence: Be wary of claims or statements that lack credible evidence or supporting facts.

Fraudsters, Liars, Deceivers, Cheats, and Criminals

1. Unrealistic promises: Be cautious of individuals or groups who make unrealistic promises or guarantees.
2. Lack of credibility: Research the credibility and reputation of individuals or groups.
3. Pressure tactics: Watch for pressure tactics, such as limited-time offers or threats, to manipulate individuals into making decisions.
4. Secrecy and evasiveness: Be wary of individuals or groups who are secretive or evasive about their activities, intentions, or goals.

Strategies for Protection

1. Verify information: Cross-check facts and claims with credible sources.
2. Seek multiple perspectives: Consider diverse viewpoints and opinions on a topic.
3. Be cautious of emotional appeals: Recognize when emotions are being manipulated to influence opinions.
4. Trust your instincts: If something feels off or doesn’t feel right, trust your instincts and investigate further.
5. Seek help and support: If you suspect someone is being radicalized or recruited, or if you’re a victim of deception, seek help and support from trusted authorities, experts, or support groups.

How to differentiate Proper Agenda & Propoganda in Content, people, groups or organisations?

Differentiating between a proper agenda and propaganda can be challenging, but here are some key differences and strategies to help you make that distinction:

Proper Agenda

1. Transparency: A clear and open declaration of goals, intentions, and motivations.
2. Evidence-based: Supported by credible evidence, research, and expert opinions.
3. Respectful dialogue: Encourages open discussion, listens to opposing views, and acknowledges potential counterarguments.
4. Focused on issue, not person: Addresses the topic or issue at hand, rather than attacking individuals or groups.
5. Seeks common ground: Aims to find mutually beneficial solutions and compromise.

Propaganda

1. Hidden or misleading agenda: Conceals or distorts true intentions, goals, or motivations.
2. Emotional manipulation: Uses emotional appeals, loaded language, and fallacies to influence opinions.
3. Cherry-picked information: Selectively presents information that supports the agenda, while ignoring or dismissing contradictory evidence.
4. Attacks opponents: Resorts to personal attacks, straw man arguments, and ad hominem attacks to discredit opponents.
5. Seeks to polarize: Aims to create an “us versus them” mentality, often by exaggerating differences and promoting fear or hatred.

Red Flags for Propaganda

1. Loaded language: Uses emotionally charged words or phrases to sway opinions.
2. Bandwagon effect: Claims that “everyone” or “most people” support the agenda, without providing credible evidence.
3. False dichotomies: Presents only two options when, in fact, there are more.
4. Ad hominem attacks: Attacks the character, credibility, or personal qualities of opponents rather than addressing the issue.
5. Lack of credible sources: Fails to provide reliable sources or evidence to support claims.

Strategies for Critical Evaluation

1. Verify information: Cross-check facts and claims with credible sources.
2. Evaluate sources: Consider the credibility, expertise, and potential biases of sources.
3. Watch for inconsistencies: Be wary of contradictions or inconsistencies within the content or message.
4. Consider multiple perspectives: Seek out diverse viewpoints and opinions on the topic.
5. Be cautious of emotional appeals: Recognize when emotions are being manipulated to influence opinions.

By being aware of these differences and using critical evaluation strategies, you’ll become more adept at distinguishing between proper agendas and propaganda.

How to check my own biases and prevent my self from being deceived, brainwashed or brain hacked by biased ideologies with extremism, radicalism, fundamentalism, fanaticism & delusion.

Checking your own biases and preventing deception by biased ideologies requires critical thinking, self-reflection, and a willingness to challenge your own assumptions. Here are some strategies to help you achieve this:

Critical Thinking

1. Seek diverse perspectives: Expose yourself to different viewpoints, especially those that contradict your own.
2. Analyze evidence: Look for credible sources, evaluate the quality of evidence, and consider alternative explanations.
3. Avoid binary thinking: Recognize that most issues are complex and multifaceted, rather than simply right or wrong.

Self-Reflection

1. Recognize your emotions: Be aware of how emotions influence your thoughts and behaviors.
2. Identify your biases: Reflect on your values, experiences, and cultural background to acknowledge potential biases.
3. Practice mindfulness: Regularly take time to introspect and consider alternative viewpoints.

Challenging Assumptions

1. Question authority: Don’t accept information at face value; instead, verify it through credible sources.
2. Consider alternative explanations: Think about other possible reasons for a phenomenon or event.
3. Seek out disconfirming evidence: Actively look for information that contradicts your existing beliefs.

Protecting Yourself from Biased Ideologies

1. Be cautious of simplistic solutions: Be wary of ideologies that offer easy answers to complex problems.
2. Watch for emotional manipulation: Be aware of appeals to emotions rather than logic and evidence.
3. Verify information through multiple sources: Cross-check information to ensure accuracy and avoid spreading misinformation.

Additional Strategies

1. Engage in respectful dialogue: Discuss topics with people from diverse backgrounds to broaden your understanding.
2. Practice open-mindedness: Be willing to change your perspective based on new evidence or compelling arguments.
3. Stay informed: Regularly update your knowledge on various topics to make informed decisions.

By incorporating these strategies into your daily life, you’ll become more adept at recognizing biases, challenging assumptions, and making informed decisions. Remember that this is an ongoing process that requires effort, patience, and a willingness to learn and adapt.

When scentific temper and rationality is seen in comparison to any religion especially your born-in, parents Religion, Orphanage Religion, National Religion & your ideology, its personal to many here in groups.. there is bound to be more Emotionality and less Rationality when they come up for discussions.. thus an anology and a parallel phenomena can help see more objectively the interaction of *Rationality and Religiosity..*

  There is therapy for Religiophobia… one can see its not the people who are the root of issues.. its the words in the scriptures that arent appealable or amendable by rational or humanitarian review, as the scriptures are given a Divine, Supernatural origin eg (Any theistic or cultic or leader wriiten religious scriptures).. 

Do see this Resource by an expert for clarity this can be applied to any other religions as well. https://www.politicalislam.com/therapy-for-islamophobia/

“Menta-bolism” the Intellectual Metabolism.

like BMR determines ones appetite.. IMR (Info Metabolic Rate) can determine ones Menta-bolism

Every once in a while, the internet throws up a gem like this one👇

*Informational obesity will kill you.*
(LinkedIn post by Shashank Sharma)

“Let me explain.

Somewhere in the dark alleys of the internet, a man sits, scrolling. He has read 16 articles since breakfast. He knows why the economy is collapsing, what the stock market will do next, and the exact reason a celebrity was caught cheating. He is drowning in knowledge, and yet, if you ask him to explain any of it, he will pause, scratch his head, and say, “It’s complicated.”

This man is sick. Not in the way his doctor understands, but in the way an overfed brain stops working. He is a victim of informational obesity: a condition where a person consumes more knowledge than they can digest, ending up confused, anxious, and painfully misinformed.

The disease is common. It spreads fast. Everyone you know is sick. They read news, they watch debates, they argue online. They have an opinion on everything. They are certain that they are right. But if you lock them in a room and ask them to explain their certainty, they will fumble. Because their knowledge is borrowed. It is second-hand. It is a thin layer of information wrapped around a void.

This is the great irony of the modern world. More people know more things than ever before, and yet, real wisdom is dying. Thought is being replaced by reaction. Inquiry is being replaced by confidence. People read, not to understand, but to win arguments. They consume, not to grow, but to belong.

And here is the worst part: the people who flood you with this information know exactly what they are doing. The tech gods and media kings do not want you to think. They want you to keep scrolling, keep arguing, keep coming back for more. Your addiction is their profit. Your mental exhaustion is their business model.

So what is the cure? It is not ignorance. Ignorance is the twin of blind knowledge. The cure is discipline. Read less, but understand more. Choose your knowledge the way you choose your food: carefully, deliberately. Ask: Does this information make me wiser, or does it only make me feel informed?

Because in the end, informational obesity is worse than physical obesity. A fat body can still think. But a fat mind is just noise pretending to be thought.