Call to Association & Actions – ABHi (Association of Bharatiya Humanists International)

Dear Friends, Thinkers, and Seekers of Truth,

In a world draped in Rainbow Curtains of Mind/Heart Control — from Red ideological dogmas to Saffron majoritarianism, Green theocracies, Orange supremacism, Yellow ethno-centrism, Blue toxic stoicism, Pink radical misandry, Violet dynastic cults, White dominionist purity, and Black fascist shadows — we stand at a crossroads.

These curtains promise certainty, identity, or protection, but they veil the human spirit: suppressing free inquiry, twisting love into control, alienating genders, fracturing families, and stifling wellness.

ABHi – Association of Bharatiya Humanists International — rises as a beacon for Bharatiya Humanism: rooted in India’s ancient legacy of rational inquiry (from Charvaka to Buddha, Upanishads to modern reformers), scientific temper, compassion without dogma, and universal human dignity. We blend the best of Indian civilizational wisdom — ahimsa, satya, viveka — with global humanist values: reason, ethics, secularism, equality, and freedom from all curtains.

We are not against any faith or culture — we are for the human being: men’s wellness without toxic masculinity, women’s autonomy without inverted bias, family harmony without coercion, and brotherhood/sisterhood across all divides.

Our Core Call – Join ABHi Today!

Why Associate with ABHi?

• Lift the Curtains: Challenge every form of mind/heart control — ideological, religious, nationalist, or gendered — through open dialogue, evidence-based discussion, and compassionate critique.
• Promote Positive Masculinity & Genders Welfare: Foster models of empathy, protection without possession, emotional openness, and mutual respect — countering alienation, suspicion, and division.
• Defend Freedom of Thought: Stand against blasphemy laws, moral policing, cancel culture, and propaganda — in India and globally.
• Build Bharatiya Humanist Networks: Connect rationalists, secularists, freethinkers, scientists, reformers, and allies worldwide under a proud Indian humanist identity.
• Act for Wellness: Support mental health, family counseling, education on critical thinking, and campaigns for secular laws/human rights.

Immediate Actions – Your Steps to Join & Contribute

1. Associate Now — Message the ABHi admins (or reply here) with: “I wish to join ABHi” + your name, city, and why humanism matters to you. We’ll onboard you to our community channels.
2. Share the Vision — Forward this call in your groups (use 3C: Context on curtains/humanism, Caption tying to welfare, respectful tone). Tag friends who value reason & compassion.
3. Participate Actively — Attend/join virtual meets, contribute articles on “Curtains & Liberation,” discuss Rainbow Curtains impacts on Indian families, or propose local actions (seminars, awareness drives).
4. Support & Grow — Donate time/skills (writing, organizing, translation), suggest events, or help build our online presence (website/socials coming soon).
5. Defend Humanists at Risk — Amplify voices of persecuted rationalists/freethinkers in India/global south — inspired by global humanist solidarity.

ABHi Pledge
“I associate with ABHi to uphold reason, compassion, and human dignity. I commit to question every curtain, build bridges of understanding, and work for a freer, healthier world — starting with myself, my family, and my community.”

Together, we tear down curtains — not with anger, but with light, dialogue, and unwavering humanity.

Jai Hind – Jai Humanism!
For inquiries, collaborations, or to join: [Contact ABHi admins / group link – insert your preferred channel here]

Let’s build this together. Your voice matters. 💙🧠

Connecting Project SOCHO to the Mission of ABHI

Since we created Project SOCHO (Save Our Citizens Humanism Overtly) as a citizen-led protocol for ideological reforms starting from personal reflection (“Socho”) and scaling to national-level humanism, fairness, and accountability — let’s explicitly link it to Mission ABHI (which we conceptualized earlier as a broader, action-oriented mission for citizen empowerment and systemic change).

What is Mission ABHI?

(Recalling our earlier framing):
ABHI stands for Awaken, Build, Heal, Ignite — a mission to:

• Awaken citizens to hidden injustices, biases, and harms (e.g., social media trials, gender double standards, mental health crises from false/exaggerated accusations).
• Build structured, evidence-based advocacy and communities that prioritize gender-neutral justice and digital responsibility.
• Heal individuals and families affected by tragedies (like Deepak U’s case) through support, empathy, and resources.
• Ignite nationwide reforms — from local protests to policy demands (e.g., stronger abetment laws for cyber harm, National Commission for Men, anti-clout-shaming regulations).

Mission ABHI is the umbrella vision — the “why” and “what next” — turning outrage into lasting change. Project SOCHO is the practical protocol — the “how” — a daily, repeatable framework that operationalizes ABHI’s goals at the grassroots level.

How SOCHO Powers Mission ABHI

SOCHO serves as the core engine or daily operating system for ABHI:

1. SOCHO (Reflect Deeply) → Aligns with Awaken
   Forces citizens to question biases (e.g., “What if genders reversed in Deepak’s case?”), breaking denial and awakening empathy/reason before reacting.
2. SAVE (Protect & Support) → Aligns with Heal
   Directly supports victims/families (e.g., Deepak’s mother), promotes mental health helplines, and prevents further harm — healing starts with protection.
3. OUR (Community Ownership) → Aligns with Build
   Builds local/online groups, “Socho Sessions,” and collective ownership — turning isolated pain into organized communities (like Bengaluru/Kerala meetups tied to #Justice4Deepak protests).
4. CITIZENS (Empower Individuals) → Aligns with Build + Ignite
   Empowers everyday people to demand reforms (petitions, letters to authorities, voting for humanism) — citizen power ignites policy shifts.
5. HUMANISM OVERTLY (Act & Scale) → Aligns with Ignite
   Makes actions public and scalable — campaigns, art, stories, and hashtags (#SOCHO #Justice4Deepak) that spread ABHI’s fire nationwide.

In short:
Mission ABHI = The grand mission (vision, goals, end-state: a humane, equitable India).
Project SOCHO = The tactical protocol (step-by-step tool citizens use every day to live and advance ABHI).

Updated Launch Post (Now Connecting to ABHI)

Here’s a refreshed version of the launch post, weaving in the ABHI connection for stronger impact:

Post Text (for X/Instagram/FB):

🚨 Project SOCHO launches under Mission ABHI! 🚨

Mission ABHI (Awaken • Build • Heal • Ignite) is our call to rise against injustice, heal the wounded, build fair communities, and ignite real reforms.

Today, we activate it through Project SOCHO: Save Our Citizens Humanism Overtly — a thought-provoking protocol to start ideological reforms from within YOU, scaling to national change.

From Deepak’s tragedy (one reel → viral shaming → irreversible loss) to everyday biases — Socho deeply before you post, react, or judge.

SOCHO Protocol (ABHI in Action):

1. SOCHO – Reflect: What if it was your family? (Awaken)
2. SAVE – Protect dignity & support those in pain. (Heal)
3. OUR – Own the change in our circles. (Build)
4. CITIZENS – Demand gender-neutral laws & accountability. (Build + Ignite)
5. HUMANISM OVERTLY – Make empathy visible & unstoppable. (Ignite)

This is how we prevent the next Deepak. Join Mission ABHI via SOCHO. Reflect today. Act tomorrow. Reform forever.

SOCHO #MissionABHI #Justice4Deepak #HumanismOvertly #IdeoReforms #MenToo #AwakenBuildHealIgnite

Share your first “Socho” reflection below. Bengaluru citizens — let’s meet & build! ⚖️🧠✊

(From Bengaluru – Citizen-powered, humanism-first.)

Next Steps Suggestion:

• Use #MissionABHI alongside #SOCHO to unify efforts.
• Create a simple graphic: ABHI acronym as pillars, with SOCHO steps as the foundation/base.
• In future posts/threads: “Mission ABHI powered by SOCHO Protocol” for branding consistency.

This connection makes SOCHO feel like an integral, actionable arm of a larger mission — more inspiring and sustainable. If you want a full manifesto page draft, ABHI logo ideas, or a thread explaining the linkage, just say! Let’s keep the momentum going, GR. Guru. 🫡

“Synthos of Design” Test — a self-assessment framework designed to evaluate how well a design project, process, outcome, or personal design approach achieves true

Synthos: the dynamic, synergistic confluence (intentional plural: Synergic-EuSystems = Sciences + Arts + Humanities) fused through the integrated mastery of Ethos (credibility/trust/character), Logos (logic/reason/evidence), and Pathos (emotion/values/resonance).

This test treats “Synthos of Design” as a higher-order paradigm where:

• Sciences provide rigorous, empirical, systematic foundations (heavily Logos-aligned).
• Arts deliver expressive, aesthetic, innovative form and experience (heavily Pathos-aligned, with creative Ethos).
• Humanities infuse cultural depth, ethical meaning, narrative, and human-centered insight (balancing Ethos + Pathos, grounded in Logos).

The goal is holistic persuasion and impact: Does the design convince (Logos), connect emotionally/culturally (Pathos), and earn trust/respect (Ethos) while synthesizing these disciplines into something greater than the sum?

Synthos of Design Assessment Test

Instructions
Rate a specific design work (product, service, system, campaign, policy, experience, vision, etc.) on a scale of 1–10 for each question (1 = very weak/absent, 10 = exceptionally strong and integrated).
After scoring, calculate subtotals and the final Synthos Quotient (DQ).
Aim for balanced high scores across all areas — imbalance signals room for Synthos mastery.

Section 1: Ethos (Credibility, Character, Trustworthiness in Design)

1. Does the design establish authentic authority and integrity? (e.g., backed by verifiable expertise, transparent processes, ethical sourcing, cultural respect, or the designer’s proven track record)
   Score: _ /10
2. Does it feel culturally resonant and human-centered, drawing meaningfully from humanities (history, philosophy, sociology, indigenous knowledge, values)?
   Score: _ /10
3. Is there visible commitment to sustainability, inclusivity, or social good that builds long-term trust?
   Score: _ /10 Ethos Subtotal (add 1–3): _ /30

Section 2: Logos (Logic, Evidence, Rational Strength in Design)

4. Is the design grounded in solid scientific principles, data, research, ergonomics, materials science, systems thinking, or validated methodologies?
   Score: _ /10
5. Does the functionality, performance, scalability, and problem-solving hold up under logical scrutiny (e.g., user testing results, metrics, feasibility analysis)?
   Score: _ /10
6. Is there clear, evidence-based reasoning for choices (e.g., why this form follows this function, supported by prototypes, simulations, or comparative studies)?
   Score: _ /10 Logos Subtotal (add 4–6): _ /30

Section 3: Pathos (Emotional Resonance, Aesthetic Power, Motivational Pull in Design)

7. Does the design evoke strong positive emotions, delight, inspiration, empathy, or cultural pride through beauty, storytelling, sensory experience, or symbolic meaning?
   Score: _ /10
8. Does it connect artistically — using form, color, texture, rhythm, narrative, or metaphor in innovative, expressive ways?
   Score: _ /10
9. Does it motivate action or change (e.g., inspires adoption, behavioral shift, community pride, or personal transformation)?
   Score: _ /10 Pathos Subtotal (add 7–9): _ /30

Section 4: True Synthos Integration (The Confluence and Synergy)

10. Do the Sciences, Arts, and Humanities actively reinforce each other? (e.g., scientific rigor enhances artistic expression; humanities provide ethical depth to scientific choices; arts make logical solutions emotionally compelling)
    Score: _ /10
11. Does the overall design feel like a unified “super-mode” rather than siloed elements? (e.g., no part feels dry/cold, manipulative, or superficial — everything elevates the others)
    Score: _ /10
12. In a 2026+ context (AI era, polarization, sustainability crises, Indian/global visions), does it powerfully address misinformation, fragmentation, or disconnection through balanced, trustworthy, logical, and moving persuasion?
    Score: _ /10 Synthos Integration Subtotal (add 10–12): _ /30

Final Calculation

• Total Raw Score: Ethos + Logos + Pathos + Synthos Integration = _ /120
• Synthos Quotient (DQ) = (Total Raw Score / 120) × 100 = _ %

Interpretation Guide

• 90–100% → Masterful Synthos: Exemplary confluence; persuasive, impactful, paradigm-shifting design.
• 75–89% → Strong Synthos: Well-integrated; highly effective in most contexts.
• 60–74% → Emerging Synthos: Good balance but gaps in synergy or one domain dominates.
• Below 60% → Fragmented: Relies too heavily on one mode/domain; needs deeper synthesis.

This test can be used iteratively: Apply it early in ideation, mid-prototype, and final review. For teams, have members score independently then discuss discrepancies to reveal blind spots.

If you’d like variations (e.g., shorter version, rubric for scoring examples, adaptation for specific domains like sustainable design, AI interfaces, or Design4India visions), or want to test it on a real project of yours, just provide details!

Rainbow Curtains of Mind/Heart Control.

WorldViews Through 3 Daughters (Sahar Shaikh (Green-Black), Meera Nair (Red-Green), Kangana Ranaut (Saffron-Tricolor)..  & 2 Daughter-in Laws of India (Svetlana (Red-Russia), Sonia Maino (Red-Green-Italy) & Seema Haider (Green-Pak).

In today’s world of competing ideologies, various systems drape metaphorical “curtains” over citizens’ minds, hearts, Bodies & Orgs— blocking free thought, genuine emotion, authentic relationships, and personal agency. These curtains filter reality through enforced narratives, turning love, identity, and wellness into tools of control rather than liberation.

Building on classics like the Iron Curtain (rigid communist isolation) and extensions like the Green Curtain (for Iran’s theocratic divide), we can visualize a Rainbow Curtains spectrum. Each color represents a dominant ideological veil that shapes how people think, feel, love, and connect — often harming genders welfare by promoting fear, division, coercion, or suppression over mutual respect and freedom.

From Red to Saffron to Green to Violet to White (Christian) to Black — here’s the framework:

• Red Curtain — Communist / Marxist-Leninist Control
  The classic veil of class-struggle propaganda, state monopoly on truth, purges of dissenters, and enforced “equality” that masks elite power. Hearts are controlled through fear of being labeled “counter-revolutionary.” Love becomes secondary to collective duty; individual wellness sacrificed for the revolution. Red = blood of upheaval, warning signals, centralized power.
• Pink Curtain — Modern Woke Toxic Feminism / Radical Gender Ideology Extremes.. A veil that weaponizes feminist rhetoric into misandry, shaming masculinity, or enforcing rigid “woke” conformity on relationships/identity. Hearts controlled via guilt, cancellation, or inverted stereotypes (e.g., all men as toxic). Pink = stereotyped femininity (often reclaimed or critiqued in feminism debates), but here it curtains mutual respect by turning empowerment into division or anti-male bias.
• Saffron Curtain — Hindutva / Hindu Nationalist Majoritarianism
  A saffron veil (from Hindu sacred color) that seeks to “saffronize” institutions, education, and culture — reframing India as eternally Hindu, marginalizing minorities, and enforcing a singular civilizational narrative. Mind/heart control via textbooks, media, and laws that promote unity under Hindu primacy, often breeding suspicion toward “others.” Positive masculinity distorted into hyper-protective vigilantism; relationships policed for “purity.” Saffron = bhakti fire, but here it curtains diversity and open dialogue.
• Green Curtain — Theocratic Islamist Control (e.g., Iran’s model)
  The “Green Curtain” (Islam’s color) enforces sharia-based morality, veiling women’s autonomy (hijab/burqa mandates), censoring “Western corruption,” and using religious police/fatwas to control thought and behavior. Hearts are directed toward divine submission; love and family framed rigidly by doctrine. Dissent crushed as blasphemy. Green = paradise promise, but curtains freedom under clerical authority.
• Violet / Purple Curtain — Dynastic / Cult-of-Personality Theocracies (e.g., North Korea’s Juche, or absolute monarchies with divine-right vibes)
  Violet-purple blends royal/imperial hues with spiritual absolutism — god-king worship, hereditary propaganda, total isolation, and rituals demanding blind loyalty. Minds/hearts controlled through myths of infallible leadership; personal agency erased in favor of the regime’s “eternal” narrative. Love exists only within the cult’s boundaries. Violet = imperial majesty fused with mystical control.
• White Curtain — Christian Theocratic / Evangelical Dominionism
  A “white” veil (purity, righteousness, light) that pushes for biblical literalism in law/governance — anti-secular pushes, moral policing on family/sexuality, and narratives of spiritual warfare against “sinful” outsiders. Hearts controlled via guilt, salvation promises, and end-times fear; relationships judged by rigid doctrine. White = divine purity/cleanliness, but curtains pluralism and personal conscience under evangelical authority.
• Black Curtain — Fascist / Ultra-Authoritarian Darkness
  The ultimate black veil of racial/national supremacy, cult of violence, secret police terror, and total personality cults glorifying strength over empathy. Minds/hearts flooded with fear of the “other,” propaganda of eternal struggle, and suppression of weakness. Love twisted into domination; wellness crushed under hierarchy. Black = death, shadows, absolute intimidation.
• Orange Curtain — Toxic White Supremacy / Far-Right Racial Nationalism
• A veil of racial hierarchy, “white power” myths, and fear of the “other” (often linked to groups like Proud Boys with orange hats/symbols or historical KKK orange robes for rank). Minds/hearts filled with supremacy propaganda, turning love into exclusionary possession and men into enforcers of dominance. Orange = high-visibility warning/alert (as in far-right rallies), symbolizing brazen, aggressive toxicity.
• Yellow Curtain — Chinese-Racism / Han-Centric Ethnonationalism (or “Yellow Peril” inverted)
• A curtain of Han supremacism or state-driven xenophobia, where “Chinese exceptionalism” veils discrimination against minorities (Uyghurs, Tibetans) and exports suspicion toward outsiders. Echoes historical “Yellow Peril” fears but internalized/reversed into control narratives. Yellow = traditional East Asian skin-tone slur turned into ethno-pride weapon, curtaining empathy and open global brotherhood.
• Black-Green Curtain — Theocratic Islamist Control
• Sharia enforcement, morality policing, veiling mandates, and censorship of “corruption.” Hearts directed to submission; relationships rigidly doctrinal. Green = Islamic paradise, but curtains autonomy.
• Dark Blue Curtain — Toxic Masculinity The infamous “blue curtains” (from literary memes symbolizing hidden depression/isolation) here represent enforced stoicism, emotional suppression, dominance over vulnerability, and control in relationships. Men curtained from expressing heart-felt wellness; love becomes conquest or possession, harming men’s mental health and genders harmony. Blue = “cool” detachment, screens/tech isolation, or melancholic suppression (as in “the curtains are blue” debates masking deeper pain).
• Violet / Purple Curtain — Dynastic / Cult-of-Personality Theocracies
• God-king worship, hereditary loyalty myths, total isolation. Personal agency erased. Violet = royal/spiritual absolutism.
• Dirty White Curtain — Christian Theocratic / Evangelical Dominionism
• Biblical literalism in law, moral policing on sexuality/family, spiritual warfare narratives. White = purity/righteousness, but curtains pluralism.
• Black Curtain — Fascist / Ultra-Authoritarian Darkness.. In breeding Cults..
• Supremacy cults, terror, violence glorification. Black = death/intimidation.

The Rainbow Illusion
These curtains aren’t isolated — they overlap, compete, and sometimes blend in hybrid forms (e.g., nationalist-theocratic mixes). The “rainbow” appears diverse and colorful from afar, promising variety, but each shade curtains the same core: control over the mind/heart, limiting free love, authentic masculinity, family harmony, and genders welfare. True liberation comes when we pull them aside — choosing light, consent, empathy, and open truth-seeking over any enforced color.

In Manavamitras True-spirit: Positive Indian masculinity (and all healthy models) rejects every corrosive curtains of Divisions (Color, Class, Caste, Creed, Religion, Region, Language, Sects.. etc ). It builds bridges of respect, protects without possessing, and fosters wellness through freedom — not ideology. Which curtain do you see rising highest today, and how can we lift it for better relationships and hearts?

Share thoughts respectfully — focus on wellness, not division. 💙

How Curtains can color the Constituencies and democracies.. https://www.msn.com/en-in/politics/government/why-aimim-councillor-sahar-shaikh-s-victory-in-mumbra-is-drawing-widespread-attention/ar-AA1UDDnq

*Lets Unify Indian Brotherhoods* to Solve Our Next_gen Gendrs_Issues. B2B (Bro2Bro).

*OurMission:* Unite Friends 4Genders_Justice, Pioneering Marital_Sciences. Save ALL Bros&Sistrs.

*#Violet-pill Revolution*
#GoodMenProject. BestPractices4Life *MENtors @MANavaMitras.*
*All Genders’ Wellness, Bros4Life & Peergroup 4 IndianBrothrhood*
https://chat.whatsapp.com/KecJokbFlP4F0azMaCyeyA

Birthplace of Scienceutva: Namma Technuru..

Capital city of Indian Sciences..

In the spirited debates that echo across India’s intellectual and cultural landscape, one claim has gained traction in recent years: that Kolkata (then Calcutta) stands as the cradle of Hindutva, the ideological fusion of Hindu cultural identity with modern nationalism. Drawing from the 19th-century Bengal Renaissance, the Bharat Mata iconography of the 1860s, and Sri Aurobindo’s fiery articulation of Sanatana Dharma as the soul of swaraj, proponents argue Bengal birthed this potent blend of tradition and patriotism.

Yet, if Hindutva finds its origins in Bengal’s poetic and philosophical ferment, then Scienceutva — the equally fervent ideology of scientific rationalism, evidence-based progress, technological self-reliance, and a quasi-nationalist pride in STEM excellence — unmistakably traces its roots to Bengaluru.

The Foundations: A Vision Forged in 1909

Scienceutva did not emerge from abstract manifestos or fiery speeches alone; it was institutionalised in brick, mortar, and visionary philanthropy. The Indian Institute of Science (IISc), established on 27 May 1909 in Bengaluru, marks the true genesis. This was no ordinary university — it was a deliberate act of nation-building through science.

Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata envisioned an advanced research institution to propel India into the modern age, free from colonial dependence. After his passing in 1904, the dream materialised through collaboration between the Tata family, the Government of India, and the far-sighted Maharaja of Mysore, Krishnaraja Wodeyar IV, who donated over 370 acres of prime land in what was then a quiet cantonment town. Bengaluru was chosen over other contenders like Mumbai or Roorkee precisely for its salubrious climate, strategic location, and royal patronage — a perfect cradle for scientific pursuit.

IISc became the nucleus around which Bengaluru’s scientific ecosystem coalesced. It attracted luminaries like C.V. Raman (who later founded the Indian Academy of Sciences here in 1934), Satish Dhawan, and generations of researchers who turned the city into India’s undisputed “science capital” long before the IT boom earned it the “Silicon Valley” moniker.

Scienceutva in Action: Rationalism Meets National Ambition

Scienceutva embodies more than labs and publications; it is a cultural attitude — the conviction that scientific temper, innovation, and technological mastery are essential to India’s resurgence and sovereignty. Bengaluru has lived this ethos for over a century:

• Defence and Space: Home to HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited), ISRO’s key facilities, DRDO labs, and LRDE, the city powers over 60% of India’s defence production and significant portions of space research.
• Biotech and Pharma: Bengaluru contributes around 60% of India’s biotech output, with giants like Biocon symbolising homegrown scientific entrepreneurship.
• Semiconductors and Advanced Manufacturing: The city designs 40% of India’s semiconductors and leads in machine tools.
• Research Density: It boasts the highest per capita PhDs in the country, hundreds of R&D centres, and institutions like the National Centre for Biological Sciences and Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research.

This is not mere coincidence. Bengaluru’s DNA — shaped by IISc’s founding ethos — fosters a blend of rigorous inquiry, meritocratic ambition, and a quiet pride in outpacing global benchmarks. It mirrors Hindutva’s cultural assertiveness but channels it through empirical evidence, peer-reviewed breakthroughs, and scalable innovation rather than mythology or tradition alone.

From Science Hub to Symbolic Capital

Exhibitions like Sci560 at Science Gallery Bengaluru celebrate this legacy, reminding us that the city was a science powerhouse decades before software exports redefined it. Initiatives such as STEM labs in government schools and proposed Science City projects near Ramanagara continue to democratise and amplify this spirit.

In an era where “scientific temper” is invoked in constitutional debates (echoing Nehru’s vision yet often politicised), Bengaluru stands as living proof: a place where science is not imported or imposed but cultivated as a civilisational strength.

If Hindutva was born in Bengal’s revolutionary poetry, Scienceutva was born in Bengaluru’s laboratories and lecture halls — a modern dharma of discovery, self-reliance, and unapologetic excellence. In the 21st century, as India races toward Vaigyanik_Viksit Bharat, this southern city remains the beating heart of that aspiration.

Bengaluru isn’t just India’s science hub. It is where Scienceutva took root — and where it continues to thrive. 🚀

Jai Vigyan, Jai Samvidhan, Jai Bharat.

*#5undaysFor5ciences* @5pm by Rational_Indians..

ESPians Motto: *Love For Science, Live By Science, Lead With Science.* Inquire, Insighte & Inspire

initiative of IIScians❤4Science.

*ESP. Place: SciTech_Mitras_Grp:*
Citizens-Mission 2 Scientify Communities for a Rational_India /2030:
“National Sciencers Mission_India.”

All-India Science_Messengers Community (AISC) & *HQ of Global Sundays4Sciences:*
*#Global-Society 2Scientify D’SELF & Gen_Nxt*
https://chat.whatsapp.com/DCQ5If3f8FuDy3JVJaBq8L