Event #1 Link: https://sites.google.com/view/ipsszb-spc/home

Priyamitras’ Master Mind Group InfoSharing for Peer2Peer MindCare & Mental Health Mentorships:*

All Day Event#2 Link: Suicide Preventers Group. https://chat.whatsapp.com/FjRuSB64Qp1EGxK2pJ4l29?mode=ac_t

From low urges of body to higher urgency of mind.

https://philosophicalhealing.com/

G.I = Genders Intelligence..

*All Genders’ Wellness & Bros2 Healthify Life Group:*
https://chat.whatsapp.com/KecJokbFlP4F0azMaCyeyA

Course Syllabus: Genders & Family Sciences 101

Course Overview

Course Title: Genders & Family Sciences 101
Course Code: GFS 101
Credits: 3
Prerequisites: None
Instructor: Dr. [Your Name]
Contact: [Your Email]
Office Hours: [Specify Days/Times]
Course Format: Hybrid (In-person and Online)

This introductory course explores the interdisciplinary fields of gender studies and family sciences, examining the social, cultural, and historical dimensions of gender roles, family structures, and their intersections. Students will engage with key theories, empirical research, and contemporary issues—including modern feminists and meninists perspectives—to develop a foundational understanding of how gender and family dynamics shape individual and societal experiences.

---

Course Objectives

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

1. Understand key concepts and theories in gender and family studies, including feminist, queer, and modern masculinist frameworks.
2. Analyze the impact of social, cultural, and economic factors on gender roles and family structures.
3. Evaluate historical and contemporary perspectives on gender and family dynamics, incorporating diverse viewpoints such as those from men’s studies.
4. Apply interdisciplinary approaches to real-world issues related to gender and family.
5. Develop critical thinking and communication skills through discussions and written assignments.

---

Course Outline

Week 1: Introduction to Gender and Family Sciences

• Topics: Overview of gender studies and family sciences, key terminology, interdisciplinary approaches
• Readings: Excerpts from Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions by Lisa Wade & Myra Marx Ferree
• Assignment: Reflective journal entry on personal perceptions of gender and family (500 words)

Week 2: Theoretical Foundations

• Topics: Feminist theory, queer theory, family systems theory, and introduction to modern masculinist theories (e.g., concepts from “The Rational Male” on hypergamy and intersexual dynamics)
• Readings: Feminist Theory: A Reader by Wendy Kolmar (selected chapters); Excerpts from The Rational Male by Rollo Tomassi
• Assignment: Group discussion on theoretical applications, including critiques of masculinist vs. feminist lenses

Week 3: Historical Perspectives on Gender

• Topics: Evolution of gender roles across cultures and time periods
• Readings: The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir (excerpts)
• Assignment: Short essay on historical gender norms (750 words)

Week 4: Historical Perspectives on Family

• Topics: Family structures through history (nuclear, extended, chosen families)
• Readings: Families as They Really Are by Barbara J. Risman (selected chapters)
• Assignment: Case study analysis of a historical family structure

Week 5: Gender and Socialization

• Topics: How gender is learned and reinforced through family, media, and education
• Readings: Gendered Lives by Julia T. Wood (selected chapters)
• Assignment: Media analysis project (group presentation)

Week 6: Family Dynamics and Roles

• Topics: Division of labor, parenting roles, power dynamics in families, and relational theories (e.g., Gottman’s Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse in relationships)
• Readings: The Family: Diversity, Inequality, and Social Change by Philip N. Cohen; Excerpts from The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work by John M. Gottman
• Assignment: Reflective essay on family roles, incorporating Gottman’s principles (1,000 words)

Week 7: Intersectionality in Gender and Family

• Topics: Race, class, sexuality, and their impact on gender and family experiences
• Readings: Intersectionality by Patricia Hill Collins & Sirma Bilge (excerpts)
• Assignment: Intersectionality case study (group project)

Week 8: Midterm Exam

• Format: Mixed (multiple-choice, short answer, essay)
• Covers: Weeks 1–7 materials

Week 9: Gender, Work, and Family Balance

• Topics: Work-life balance, caregiving responsibilities, and policy implications
• Readings: Unfinished Business by Anne-Marie Slaughter (selected chapters)
• Assignment: Policy brief on family leave policies (1,000 words)

Week 10: Contemporary Issues in Gender

• Topics: Gender identity, non-binary identities, transgender experiences, and modern meninist movements (e.g., critiques of feminism from men’s rights perspectives)
• Readings: Trans: A Memoir by Juliet Jacques (excerpts); Additional articles on meninism and men’s rights activism
• Assignment: Discussion board post on gender inclusivity and balanced perspectives

Week 11: Contemporary Issues in Family

• Topics: Divorce, blended families, single-parent households, and evidence-based relationship strategies (e.g., Gottman’s research on predicting marital success)
• Readings: The Marriage-Go-Round by Andrew J. Cherlin; More from Gottman’s works
• Assignment: Research paper outline on a contemporary family issue, optionally incorporating masculinist theories

Week 12: Global Perspectives on Gender and Family

• Topics: Cross-cultural comparisons of gender roles and family structures, including global masculinities
• Readings: Global Woman by Barbara Ehrenreich & Arlie Russell Hochschild (selected chapters)
• Assignment: Comparative analysis essay (1,500 words)

Week 13: Technology and Family Dynamics

• Topics: Impact of technology on relationships and family communication
• Readings: Alone Together by Sherry Turkle (excerpts)
• Assignment: Group presentation on technology’s role in families

Week 14: Policy and Advocacy

• Topics: Gender equality policies, family support systems, social change, and advocacy from diverse gender perspectives
• Readings: Half the Sky by Nicholas D. Kristof & Sheryl WuDunn (selected chapters)
• Assignment: Advocacy project proposal (group), considering balanced views on men’s and women’s issues

Week 15: Course Wrap-Up and Review

• Topics: Synthesis of key themes, including integration of modern meninist and relational theories, preparation for final project
• Assignment: Final project draft submission

Week 16: Final Project Presentations

• Format: Oral presentations and written report (2,000 words)
• Topic: Student-selected issue in gender or family sciences, encouraged to include diverse theories such as those from Tomassi or Gottman

---

Assessment and Grading

• Participation: 10%
• Weekly Assignments (journal entries, discussion posts): 20%
• Midterm Exam: 20%
• Group Projects (media analysis, intersectionality case study, advocacy project): 20%
• Final Project (presentation and report): 30%

Grading Scale:

• A: 90–100%
• B: 80–89%
• C: 70–79%
• D: 60–69%
• F: Below 60%

---

Course Policies

• Attendance: Expected for all in-person sessions; online participation required for hybrid components.
• Late Work: 10% deduction per day unless prior approval is granted.
• Academic Integrity: Plagiarism or cheating will result in a failing grade for the assignment and potential course failure.
• Inclusivity: Respectful dialogue is required; all perspectives, including controversial ones like meninist theories, must be expressed thoughtfully and critically.

---

Required Texts

1. Wade, L., & Ferree, M. M. (2018). Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions. W.W. Norton.
2. Cohen, P. N. (2020). The Family: Diversity, Inequality, and Social Change. W.W. Norton.
3. Tomassi, R. (2013). The Rational Male. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
4. Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.
5. Additional readings will be provided via course portal or library reserves.

---

Additional Resources

• Library Databases: JSTOR, ProQuest, GenderWatch
• Support Services: University Writing Center, Counseling Services
• Online Platforms: Course materials and discussions hosted on [Insert LMS, e.g., Canvas]

---

Instructor’s Note

This course is designed to foster open dialogue and critical thinking, including exploration of diverse and sometimes contentious theories like those in modern meninism. I encourage you to bring your perspectives and experiences to our discussions while maintaining respect for others. Let’s create a learning environment where everyone feels valued and heard.

Suit/Gown to Leaf G-String Index

The Suit/Gown to Leaf G-String Index (SGLG Index) is a conceptual framework to categorize dress codes for men based on the degree of skin exposure. It places attire on a spectrum from maximum coverage (minimal exposure) to minimal coverage (maximum exposure), reflecting cultural, social, or regional dressing norms. This index can be used to broadly characterize the predominant dress styles for men in a city or nation, acknowledging that individual choices vary widely. Note: “Suit_Gown” is interpreted as formal attire like suits or gown-like robes (e.g., dishdasha or kaftan) with high coverage.

Index Spectrum

The SGLG Index ranges from 1 (maximum coverage, minimal skin exposure) to 10 (minimal coverage, maximum skin exposure). Below is the spectrum with examples of attire, their approximate exposure levels, and descriptions.

1. Suit/Gown (Level 1)

• Description: Full-body formal attire, such as a three-piece suit, tuxedo, or long robe/gown like a dishdasha or kaftan, often with a tie or head covering. Covers nearly the entire body.
• Skin Exposure: ~0-5% (face and hands exposed).
• Cultural Context: Common in professional or formal settings (e.g., business meetings in New York, traditional events in the Middle East).

1. Overcoat or Sherwani (Level 2)

• Description: Layered formal wear like an overcoat over a suit or a sherwani (long coat-like garment) with trousers. Provides extensive coverage with minor exposures.
• Skin Exposure: ~5-10% (face, hands, possibly neck).
• Cultural Context: Seen in colder climates or Indian weddings (e.g., Delhi, London during winter).

1. Kurta Pyjama or Button-Up Shirt with Pants (Level 3)

• Description: Traditional outfits like kurta pyjama or long-sleeved button-up shirts with full-length pants. Covers arms, torso, and legs.
• Skin Exposure: ~10-15% (face, hands, neck).
• Cultural Context: Prevalent in South Asian daily wear or office casual (e.g., Mumbai, Istanbul).

1. Polo Shirt with Chinos (Level 4)

• Description: Semi-casual attire like polo shirts with short sleeves and chinos or jeans. Exposes forearms.
• Skin Exposure: ~15-25% (face, hands, neck, forearms).
• Cultural Context: Common in business casual environments (e.g., Silicon Valley, Sydney).

1. T-Shirt with Jeans (Level 5)

• Description: Casual wear like short-sleeved T-shirts with full-length jeans or pants. Balanced exposure for everyday use.
• Skin Exposure: ~25-35% (face, hands, neck, arms).
• Cultural Context: Widespread in urban casual settings (e.g., Los Angeles, Berlin).

1. Tank Top with Shorts (Level 6)

• Description: Sporty or casual outfits like tank tops and knee-length shorts. Exposes shoulders, arms, and lower legs.
• Skin Exposure: ~35-50% (arms, shoulders, lower legs).
• Cultural Context: Popular in warm climates or gyms (e.g., Miami, Rio de Janeiro).

1. Swim Trunks or Lungi (Level 7)

• Description: Beachwear like swim trunks or traditional wrapped garments like lungi/dhoti (knee-length). Exposes upper body and legs.
• Skin Exposure: ~50-65% (torso, arms, legs).
• Cultural Context: Common in coastal or rural areas (e.g., Goa, Bali).

1. Speedo or Loincloth (Level 8)

• Description: Minimal swimwear like Speedos or traditional loincloths. Covers essentials but exposes most of the body.
• Skin Exposure: ~65-80% (most of torso, arms, legs).
• Cultural Context: Seen in swimming or tribal settings (e.g., European beaches, African tribes).

1. G-String or Minimal Tribal Wear (Level 9)

• Description: Very minimal coverage like G-strings or tribal penis sheaths (e.g., koteka in Papua New Guinea).
• Skin Exposure: ~80-90% (almost entire body).
• Cultural Context: Rare in urban areas; found in nudist beaches or uncontacted tribes (e.g., Amazonian indigenous groups).

1. Leaf G-String (Level 10)
   • Description: Improvised or traditional minimal covering, like a fig leaf or vine G-string, essentially near-nude.
   • Skin Exposure: ~90-95% (virtually no coverage).
   • Cultural Context: Hypothetical or in isolated, naturalist communities (e.g., solitary islanders like Sentinelese tribes).

Application to Cities/Nations

The SGLG Index can characterize predominant men’s dress codes based on norms, climate, and context. Examples:

• Level 1-3 (Suit/Gown to Kurta Pyjama): Cities like Tokyo (Japan) or Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), where formal or traditional full-coverage attire is common.
• Level 4-6 (Polo to Tank Top/Shorts): Urban areas like New York (USA) or Mumbai (India), blending casual and semi-formal styles.
• Level 7-8 (Swim Trunks to Speedo): Beach destinations like Sydney (Australia) or Goa (India).
• Level 9-10 (G-String to Leaf G-String): Remote or tribal regions like parts of Papua New Guinea or uncontacted Amazon tribes.

Notes

• Cultural Sensitivity: This is descriptive, not prescriptive. Exposure varies by context (e.g., work vs. leisure).
• Dynamic Nature: Norms change with fashion and globalization.

Official Uniformist (Soldier) to Naturalist (Solitary Islanders) Index

The Official Uniformist to Naturalist Index (OUN Index) is a conceptual framework for men’s wear, focusing on the spectrum from structured, official uniforms (e.g., soldier attire with full coverage) to naturalist or minimalist styles (e.g., solitary islanders with high exposure). It emphasizes lifestyle and contextual factors alongside skin exposure, from regimented to free-form dressing.

Index Spectrum

The OUN Index ranges from 1 (structured, maximum coverage in official contexts) to 10 (naturalist, minimal coverage in isolated or free lifestyles). Examples include attire, exposure levels, and contexts.

1. Soldier Uniform (Level 1)

• Description: Military fatigues or dress uniforms with long sleeves, pants, boots, and possibly helmets. Full protection for duty.
• Skin Exposure: ~0-5% (face exposed).
• Cultural Context: Military or official settings (e.g., active duty soldiers in the US or India).

1. Police or Security Uniform (Level 2)

• Description: Uniforms with shirts, trousers, and vests. Structured but slightly less militarized.
• Skin Exposure: ~5-10% (face, hands).
• Cultural Context: Law enforcement in cities like London or Delhi.

1. Business Suit Uniform (Level 3)

• Description: Corporate suits as “uniforms” for professionals, with shirts and ties.
• Skin Exposure: ~10-15% (face, hands, neck).
• Cultural Context: Office environments in Tokyo or New York.

1. Workwear Overalls (Level 4)

• Description: Functional uniforms like mechanic overalls or construction gear.
• Skin Exposure: ~15-20% (face, hands, sometimes arms).
• Cultural Context: Industrial areas (e.g., Detroit, Manchester).

1. Casual Uniform (Level 5)

• Description: Standardized casual like branded polos and khakis (e.g., retail uniforms).
• Skin Exposure: ~20-30% (arms, neck).
• Cultural Context: Service industries in urban centers.

1. Athletic Wear (Level 6)

• Description: Sports uniforms like jerseys and shorts, transitioning to less structured.
• Skin Exposure: ~30-50% (arms, legs).
• Cultural Context: Gyms or teams in Los Angeles or Sydney.

1. Beach or Resort Wear (Level 7)

• Description: Swim shorts and tank tops, for relaxed lifestyles.
• Skin Exposure: ~50-65% (torso, legs).
• Cultural Context: Coastal communities (e.g., Hawaii, Goa).

1. Tribal Attire (Level 8)

• Description: Traditional tribal clothing like loincloths or wraps in semi-naturalist settings.
• Skin Exposure: ~65-80% (most body).
• Cultural Context: Indigenous groups (e.g., African Maasai warriors).

1. Minimalist Islander Wear (Level 9)

• Description: Sparse coverings like vine wraps or sheaths for solitary lifestyles.
• Skin Exposure: ~80-90% (near-nude).
• Cultural Context: Remote islands (e.g., Papua New Guinea tribes).

1. Naturalist (Solitary Islanders) (Level 10)
   • Description: Virtually no clothing, or improvised leaf/ natural coverings, embracing nudity or extreme minimalism.
   • Skin Exposure: ~90-100% (full exposure).
   • Cultural Context: Uncontacted or naturalist communities (e.g., Sentinelese islanders, nudist retreats).

Application to Cities/Nations

Examples of placements:

• Level 1-3 (Soldier to Business Uniform): Nations with strong military traditions like Israel or South Korea.
• Level 4-6 (Workwear to Athletic): Industrial or sporty cultures like Germany or Australia.
• Level 7-8 (Beach to Tribal): Tropical regions like Brazil or Kenya.
• Level 9-10 (Minimalist to Naturalist): Isolated areas like the Amazon or Andaman Islands.

Notes

• Contextual Focus: Emphasizes lifestyle from regimented (uniformist) to free (naturalist).
• Sensitivity: Respects cultural practices; exposure is not a value judgment.

Rock Paper Scissors. https://www.rpsgame.org/

https://www.bemindfulonline.com/test-your-stress

https://kresserinstitute.com/tools/pss/

https://www.quizexpo.com/what-color-is-your-love/

https://sleepopolis.com/calculators/sleep/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/tests/health/sleep-habits-test

Poem Contest Submission for Ekam Nyaay Foundation.

I Trusted & U Twisted.

(A False Accusation Victims Voice.)

I trusted you, our words a shared tongue,
Though your village differed, your heart seemed young.
I sought friends, kin in spirit, not just name,
Dreaming of solidarity, a community’s flame.

I bypassed brighter paths to give you a chance,
Now I curse my choice, caught in this dance.
Your unfairness Within, was opposite of my hues,
Held no warning of the darkness you grew.

our homes hearts sparked bright, a radiant glow,
But yours, a shadow, I’d never know.
I saw your youth, thought innocence true,
Yet you wove lies that our lives now rue.

Your online profile screamed deceit, but to red flags I turned blind,
Believed in good, in a heart that’s kind.
Now trapped in this prison of your cruel creation,
My trust betrayed, my soul confined.

I hope and Trust the Divine or Human Justice will be served, & we all will get back in Life with efforts that which we Always deserved.

U Trusted Me but I Thrusted U..

(A Deviant’s Confessions..)

You trusted me, thought our roots aligned,
Shared language, shared hopes, our paths entwined.
I seemed a friend, a brother from afar,
But I hid a blade beneath my star.

You sought unity, a bond to forge,
While I planned a storm on your heart’s shore.
You passed up others, gave me your hand,
Unknowing I’d bury you in sinking sand.

My skin, my mother’s, dark as night,
You thought it harmless, saw only light.
But my heart was coal, my intent to sting,
A trap set tight with a liar’s spring.

You saw my youth, assumed a soul pure,
But I spun a web, your ruin my lure.
Your trust was soft, an easy mark to bruise,
I thrusted deep, with lies I’d choose.

Until I completed my SCAM of Seed, Corrupt, Abuse & Mess Life.