For Humanism, Indians, Bengalureans & IIScians: We Grow Resourceful Purpose_SpAces: Collaborate with Mitrallys wanting to know, Grow & Help Futureones Grow.
get ur M.cThink course here.. “Masters in Critical Thinking”.
How to Improve Thinking for CHI (Collective Human Intelligence) to not be fooled by Any A.I or any BH.A.Is..?
https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-channel-on-youtube/787/
https://icriticalthinking.org/
https://icriticalthinking.org/critical-thinking-aptitude-test/
The East India Company (EIC), often romanticized as a trading enterprise, can indeed be more accurately described as the “Exploit India Company” due to its systematic exploitation of India’s resources, people, and economy for British gain. Below, I justify this recharacterization by examining the EIC’s actions and their devastating impact, building on the context of the original article.
The EIC was not merely a trading company but a mechanism for extracting India’s wealth to fuel British prosperity. By the mid-18th century, the EIC had secured control over Bengal, one of India’s richest regions, following the Battle of Plassey (1757). Through monopolistic trade practices and coercive taxation, the EIC siphoned off vast sums of wealth. For example:
This systematic economic plunder aligns with the term “Exploit India Company,” as the EIC prioritized profit over India’s welfare, treating the subcontinent as a resource to be drained.
The EIC was not just a commercial entity; it was a de facto colonial government. By the early 19th century, it controlled vast territories, maintained private armies, and even waged wars to expand its influence. This political domination was inherently exploitative:
Calling it the “Exploit India Company” reflects its role as a corporate state that ruled India for profit, not progress, subordinating millions to its agenda.
The EIC’s exploitation extended beyond economics and politics to the social and cultural fabric of India. Its policies disrupted traditional systems and imposed alien values:
The term “Exploit India Company” captures this cultural and social pillage, highlighting how the EIC dismantled India’s heritage for its own ends.
As noted in the original article, thinkers like Adam Smith and Karl Marx inadvertently provided intellectual cover for the EIC’s actions. Smith’s free trade principles justified the EIC’s market manipulations as “economic progress,” while Marx’s historical materialism framed its disruptions as a necessary step toward revolution. These ideas masked the reality of exploitation:
The label “Exploit India Company” strips away these ideological veneers, naming the EIC’s actions for what they were: exploitation dressed up as commerce or progress.
The EIC’s exploitative model set a precedent for modern multinational corporations, which often prioritize profit over local welfare. Its practices—monopolies, resource extraction, and labor exploitation—mirror contemporary issues like sweatshops, environmental degradation, and economic inequality in developing nations. By rebranding it the “Exploit India Company,” we acknowledge its role as a pioneer of exploitative globalization, a legacy that continues to shape global economic disparities.
The term “Exploit India Company” is a fitting right-nomer because it encapsulates the EIC’s true nature: a corporate entity that systematically plundered India’s wealth, subjugated its people, and disrupted its social fabric under the guise of trade. From economic extraction and political domination to cultural devastation, the EIC’s actions were designed to exploit India for British gain, leaving a legacy of impoverishment and inequality. This recharacterization forces us to confront the uncomfortable truth about the origins of globalization and challenges us to address its modern echoes with greater equity and accountability.
If you’d like, I can further analyze specific EIC policies or their impacts using historical data or web sources for additional context. Let me know!
Variables, relations, Constants and transformations
They used X to Divide Y..
They used Religions to Divide Nations.
They Used Languages to Divide States.
They Use Class, Caste & Customs to Divide Neighhourhoods.
They Now Use Genders to Divide Homes.
Relational Engineering..
Factors of ‘X1′ can Get and make People come together,
but only Factor ‘Y1′ can keep the people working together without ‘X’-iting the relationship, home or life?.
What are ‘X’s & ‘Y’s.
Right & Strong Relations create strong Nationals, further Stronger Nationals create Stronger Nations.
On National Engineers day.. we Observe Engineering Its not only about building strong Houses, Offices & Infrastructures..
Enginearing can also contribute to.. “How can we build Strong Homes & Institutions like Family, Groups, Communities & Societies?”
To address your query about the “5 Engineer’s Principles for Design of Good Relations, Groups & Generations” in the context of building strong homes, institutions, and communities for and by Citizens of India (CoI), I’ll propose a framework inspired by engineering principles. These principles will focus on fostering right and strong relations to create strong nationals, ultimately contributing to a strong nation. Since the query emphasizes National Engineers’ Day and the broader application of engineering beyond physical infrastructure, the principles will draw parallels between systematic engineering design and the cultivation of robust social structures like families, groups, communities, and societies.
Here are 5 Engineer’s Principles for Designing Strong Relations, Groups, and Generations:
The statement “Right & Strong Relations create strong Nationals, further Strong Nationals create Strong Nations” aligns with the idea that individual relationships scale up to national strength. On National Engineers’ Day, celebrated on September 15 in honor of Sir M. Visvesvaraya, we recognize engineering’s role beyond physical infrastructure. By applying engineering precision—systematic planning, resilience, and optimization—to social structures, we can build strong homes (families), institutions (communities), and societies. These principles empower Citizens of India to create a cohesive, resilient, and sustainable nation.
By applying these engineering-inspired principles, Citizens of India can design relationships, groups, and generations that are as robust and enduring as the nation’s finest infrastructure, contributing to a stronger India.
If you’d like me to elaborate on any principle, provide specific examples, or create a chart to visualize these concepts (e.g., a pie chart showing the contribution of each principle to strong relations), please let me know!
Harami in urdu means Unlawful, Illegal or immoral.. eg.. Addicts of Substances like alcohol, Nicotine, Meth, Dopamine..etc
Harem in english means polygamey or adultrous with multiple partners ..
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLL_idVpCBm/?igsh=MTU5dXo0b25lMmUw
Girlfriend Kills Boyfriend and his friend..
Community Design Principles..
“Echo-Chambers” lead to Higher Systemic Biases. (Unstable Mono-Logic Building off Closed Minds).
“Recho-Chambers” lead to Lesser Biases and More Basis.. (Stable multi-logic Building of Open Minds).
Echo chambers are environments—often on social media—where people are primarily exposed to information, opinions, and viewpoints that align with their own beliefs, reinforcing biases and limiting exposure to diverse perspectives. This phenomenon is driven by algorithms on platforms like Facebook, Twitter (now X), and TikTok, which prioritize content that maximizes engagement, often creating “filter bubbles” that amplify confirmation bias and contribute to polarization, misinformation spread, and even extremism. For instance, studies show that users on platforms like Reddit and X tend to interact within homophilous networks (like-minded groups), leading to asymmetrical opinion distributions and reduced cross-ideological dialogue. Recent discussions on X highlight how echo chambers fuel political violence and division, with users noting extremes on both sides celebrating tragedies while centrists call for dialogue.
Your idea of creating “Reco Chambers” (Anti-Echo Chambers) for “recos” (recommendations) and “recovery” is a compelling counter-concept. I interpret this as designing digital or social spaces that actively recommend diverse, challenging content to help users recover from the insularity of echo chambers. This could transform recommendation algorithms from echo-enforcers into tools for broadening horizons, fostering empathy, and aiding personal or societal “recovery” from polarization. Below, I’ll outline what echo chambers are, why they’re problematic, and practical ways to build Reco Chambers.
Recent X posts echo this frustration, with users lamenting how platforms like X and Reddit create “echo chambers of cry babies” that stifle diverse opinions.
Reco_Chambers would flip the script: instead of isolating users, they’d use recommendations to introduce contrarian or diverse content, promoting recovery through deliberate exposure. This isn’t just theoretical—research and real-world tactics already point to effective methods. Here’s a structured approach, drawing from expert strategies: Strategy Description How It Supports Recos and Recovery Implementation Tips
Diversify Sources Actively Curate feeds from multiple, opposing viewpoints to counter algorithmic bias. Recommendations become tools for discovery, helping users recover by challenging assumptions and reducing confirmation bias. Follow accounts across the political spectrum on X (e.g., pair @PhillipsPOBrien’s centrist takes with extremes). Use tools like Ground News to see bias ratings. Aim for 30% “opposing” content in your daily recos.
Appoint “Devil’s Advocates” in Groups Designate roles or bots in online communities to argue counterpoints. Turns echo chambers into debate spaces, aiding recovery by building resilience to differing ideas. In Discord servers or X Spaces, rotate a “challenger” role. For personal use, ask AI like me to simulate opposing views on topics.
Algorithm Disruption Techniques Intentionally engage with diverse content to “confuse” feeds. Recos evolve to include broader perspectives, facilitating gradual recovery from insularity. Like/share neutral or opposing posts weekly. Practice “critical ignoring” by skipping sensational content. Limit time on one platform to <30 min/day.
Randomized Nudges and Rewiring Introduce random diverse recommendations or “rewire” social connections. Mimics real-world serendipity, breaking echo patterns for long-term recovery. Platforms could add “Explore Opposite” buttons (like X’s current “For You” vs. “Following”). Personally, join cross-ideology forums or use apps like Blindspot to get nudged diverse news.
Promote Offline and Cross-Generational Dialogue Shift some recos to real-life interactions. Recovery thrives in unfiltered settings, reducing online echo effects. Host mixed-group discussions (e.g., via Meetup). On X, engage replies from “silent majorities” instead of blocking.
These strategies are substantiated by studies showing that even small interventions, like random opinion nudges, can depolarize networks and lead to neutral consensus. For platforms, Reco Chambers could mean algorithm tweaks for mandatory diverse exposure (e.g., 20% contrarian recs), though regulation alone can’t fully break echoes due to user-driven selection.
Building Reco Chambers isn’t easy—users often self-select into echoes for comfort, and algorithms profit from engagement over balance. X users recently noted how two realities (e.g., conflicting narratives on political violence) persist due to these divides, urging us to “bring these worlds together.” Start small: Audit your feed today, introduce one opposing source, and track how it aids your “recovery.”
If you’d like to expand on this—e.g., prototype a Reco Chamber app, analyze specific X threads, or generate visuals for these strategies—just let me know!
Sweet Lies, Bitter Truths & Bland Facts..
The query appears to draw on concepts from Indian philosophy, particularly Hinduism and Buddhism, to form an “existential triad” of Illusion (Maya), Reality (Amaya), and Creativity (Upaya). These are linked to the evocative phrases Sweet Lies, Bitter Truths, and Bland Facts. While this specific framing isn’t a direct staple in classical texts (based on philosophical explorations of similar ideas), it resonates with core ideas in Vedanta, Tantra, and Mahayana Buddhism. I’ll break it down step by step, interpreting the connections as a metaphorical framework for human existence, perception, and navigation of reality.
This existential triad forms a dynamic loop:
If this is inspired by a specific text, tradition, or personal insight, feel free to provide more details for a deeper dive!
The phrase “Cultures of Virtue” appears to describe groups or communities that foster positive, ethical, and evidence-based practices, promoting personal growth, well-being, and mutual respect without exploitation. In contrast, “Cults of Vultures” seems to refer to predatory groups that prey on vulnerabilities, often led by charismatic figures who manipulate followers for personal gain, leading to harm like abuse or financial exploitation. The wordplay on “Culture-Virtue” vs. “Cult-Vulture” and “KYC Know Thy Culture” emphasizes the need for due diligence in evaluating any group, especially in spiritual or self-improvement contexts like meditation.
In the realm of meditation, scientific approaches backed by university research (e.g., from MIT or Harvard) represent virtuous cultures, as they rely on empirical evidence and avoid unsubstantiated claims. Conversely, groups associated with figures like Nithyananda (also known as Swami Nithyananda) or Osho (Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh) have been linked to controversies involving abuse, which align with cult-like behaviors. Below, I’ll outline how to identify influences and elements of each, drawing from established characteristics.
To distinguish between a virtuous culture and a vulturous cult, evaluate based on structure, leadership, practices, and outcomes. Here’s a comparison table: Aspect
Cultures of Virtue (e.g., Spiritual Thikings, Scientific Meditation Programs) Cults of Vultures (e.g., Controversial Spiritual Groups)
Leadership Leaders are accountable, often experts in fields like psychology or neuroscience; no single “guru” with absolute power. Charismatic leader portrayed as infallible or divine; demands unquestioning loyalty.
Practices and Claims Evidence-based, with transparent methods tested in studies (e.g., mindfulness apps improving mental health in children). Focus on verifiable benefits like reduced stress. Unscientific or mystical claims without evidence; may involve isolation, extreme rituals, or financial demands.
Member Autonomy Encourages critical thinking, personal choice, and integration with daily life; members can leave freely. Controls behavior, thoughts, or finances; uses manipulation, shaming, or isolation to retain members.
Transparency and Accountability Open to scrutiny; backed by peer-reviewed research from institutions like universities. No hidden agendas. Secretive; leaders avoid legal accountability, often facing allegations of fraud or abuse.
Outcomes for Members Improves well-being, such as better attention spans or reduced anxiety, as shown in studies with college students. Often leads to harm, including psychological manipulation, financial loss, or abuse.
External Relations Collaborates with society, science, and institutions; no hostility toward outsiders. Views outsiders with suspicion; may engage in conflicts or illegal activities to protect the group.
By applying these checks, you can spot virtuous influences that build you up versus vulturous ones that tear you down. If a group feels off, trust external verification over internal hype.
Welcome to this blog post dedicated to exploring recovery from what we’ll term “CNN Abuse” – the intertwined harms inflicted by Cults, Narcissists (Narcs), and Nexuses (networks of manipulative alliances). Whether you’ve experienced psychological manipulation in a cult-like group, endured the gaslighting and control of a narcissistic individual, or navigated the web of toxic connections in a nexus, recovery is possible. Drawing from scientific insights, ancient Indian philosophy, and practical resources, we’ll break down narcissistic abuse (a core element of CNN dynamics) using a powerful analogy from Hindu mythology. We’ll then highlight healing tools from spiritual traditions to empower victims toward strength and renewal.
This post is inspired by deep discussions on the phenomenon of narc cultic abuse and strategies for betterment through gender science and Indian philosophy. Let’s dive in.
Narcissistic abuse refers to a pattern of psychological, emotional, and sometimes physical manipulation by individuals with narcissistic traits or Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). Scientifically, NPD is characterized by grandiosity, a need for admiration, and a lack of empathy, often leading to interpersonal dysfunction where the narcissist exploits others for personal gain. Victims frequently experience chronic stress, resulting in symptoms akin to PTSD, including anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, and trust issues in future relationships. Neuroscientifically, prolonged exposure to such abuse can alter brain structures, affecting areas like the amygdala (involved in fear responses) and prefrontal cortex (decision-making), leading to heightened emotional reactivity and difficulty in detaching from the abuser.
From a psychological perspective, narcissists often employ tactics like gaslighting (making victims doubt their reality), love-bombing (initial overwhelming affection), and devaluation (sudden criticism and withdrawal). These behaviors are rooted in the narcissist’s fragile self-esteem, where aggression and control serve as defenses against perceived threats. Research shows that victims’ focus on understanding the narcissist can perpetuate the cycle, as it distracts from self-healing; instead, recognizing the abuse as the narcissist’s issue is key to recovery. In cultic or nexus settings, this abuse scales up, with group dynamics reinforcing the narcissist’s power through shared ideologies or alliances, amplifying isolation and control.
To make this vivid, let’s draw an analogy from Indian philosophy, specifically the story of Little Krishna from the Bhagavata Purana. Imagine Little Krishna and his parents (Devaki and Vasudeva) as the Empaths Team – representing innocence, love, resilience, and collective support. Krishna embodies the pure, empathetic soul: playful, wise beyond years, and inherently divine, yet vulnerable as a child. His parents symbolize nurturing empaths, imprisoned and tormented but holding onto hope and faith.
Opposing them is Uncle Kamsa and his Axis of Evil as the Narc Team. Kamsa, the tyrannical king, is the quintessential narcissist: paranoid, power-hungry, and manipulative. Prophesied to be killed by his sister’s eighth child, he imprisons Devaki and Vasudeva, systematically murdering their offspring in a bid for control – a classic narc tactic of elimination and domination. His “axis of evil” includes demons like Putana (who tries to poison baby Krishna) and other henchmen, forming a nexus of enablers who amplify his abuse through deception, violence, and fear-mongering.
Scientifically, this mirrors how narcissists project their insecurities onto victims (Kamsa’s fear of death leads to preemptive attacks), using isolation (imprisonment) and gaslighting (denying the victims’ reality). The empaths’ strength lies in unity and inner divinity: Vasudeva’s quiet resolve, Devaki’s enduring love, and Krishna’s clever escapes highlight resilience. Just as Krishna overcomes through spiritual wisdom, playfulness, and community support (e.g., foster parents Yashoda and Nanda), victims can reclaim power by building empathy networks, setting boundaries, and tapping into inner strength. This analogy underscores gender science too – often, narc abuse exploits traditional roles (e.g., empaths as caregivers), but Indian philosophy teaches balance, like Krishna’s blend of masculine protection and feminine compassion, for holistic betterment.
In essence, narc abuse isn’t just personal; it’s a systemic “war” where the narc team thrives on division, but the empaths win through self-awareness and collective healing.
Recovery from CNN abuse involves rebuilding mental, emotional, and spiritual fortitude. Below, we cite resources from the ISKCON YouTube channel (focusing on Krishna consciousness for spiritual empowerment) and dhamma.org (Vipassana meditation for mental clarity and trauma release). These draw from Indian philosophy to foster inner peace and resilience.
ISKCON (International Society for Krishna Consciousness) offers lectures and podcasts rooted in Bhakti yoga, emphasizing devotion to Krishna as a path to overcome evil influences like those of Kamsa. These can help victims heal by cultivating spiritual strength against manipulation.
These resources align with the Krishna-Kamsa analogy, teaching how devotion (bhakti) defeats narc-like tyranny through love and wisdom.
Dhamma.org promotes Vipassana meditation, a technique from ancient India taught by S.N. Goenka, focusing on observing sensations to purify the mind. While not directly addressing narcissistic abuse, Vipassana’s benefits include healing emotional trauma by fostering equanimity and detachment from suffering – crucial for narc victims.
Vipassana strengthens the mind, much like Krishna’s yoga, by observing rather than reacting to “Kamsa-like” threats.
Dr. Ramani Durvasula is a renowned clinical psychologist specializing in narcissism and narcissistic abuse recovery. Her work provides practical tools for identifying abuse, healing from it, and rebuilding self-worth through education and self-compassion strategies. Her resources are accessible and empowering for victims worldwide.
These materials emphasize that healing starts with knowledge, much like recognizing Kamsa’s tyranny in the analogy.
For individuals in India seeking immediate mental health support, Telemanas is a national initiative providing free, confidential, 24/7 counseling in over 20 languages. It’s particularly useful for those dealing with the emotional fallout of narcissistic or cultic abuse, offering a lifeline for stress, anxiety, and relationship issues.
This helpline bridges the gap for accessible care, aligning with empathetic support in the empaths’ team analogy.
Thanks Sciencers for the #Sundays4Science Call..
We deeply discussed on Phenomenon of Narc Cultic Abuse and Plan of BetterMENt of Targets by Gender Science & Indian Philosophy.
Awaiting for Next Meetup at 5pm Sundays4Sciences.. Thinkers Gain, Sharers Ingrain.
For full details on cited sources, refer to the inline citations throughout the post. Additional key references include:
GRP_VCare2Dare 