For Humanism, Indians, Bengalureans & IIScians: We Grow Resourceful Purpose_SpAces: Collaborate with Mitrallys wanting to know, Grow & Help Futureones Grow.
4. Blr_Politico-legal Tour of VidanaSoudha, Courts & Justice system trips.
5. Blr Garden & Lake-city Ride A cycling circuit of 4 Gardens like Cubbon Park, Lal bagh &
6. Close Outskirt City Rides (40-50km). Hesarghatta, Nandi Hills, MVishweshraiah museum, Devanahalli Fort, T.G Halli dam,
7. CharDam Cycle Yatra at Bengaluru. Nalakatu Cycle Ride First starting at Tank of GaviGangadeshwara(west), Then 2. LalBaghLake(South), 3.Ulsoor Lake(East) & 4. Ending at Sankey Tank/SomeshwaraTemple (North)
If interested to form a safe verified cycling group and cycle on this tours together with trustable people. Can connect in below group for fitness and cyclists. https://chat.whatsapp.com/6WoAcrUMjf9Ft4dft1yIXF
Good Food is the first step to good health.. isnt it..?.. This is one of the four Pillars of Health.. Our lives can be safer if we can control our F.E.A.Rs is here..😂
1. Food,
2. Exercise,
3. Association &
4. Relax-N-Rest.
Anyway this week sunday had good food.
Next sunday good exercise of cycling planning for a trip maybe to lalbagh, Cuban park or the 4 kempegowda towers city cycle tour.
What’s the Color Theory of Ideological Color Coding?
Why is Red(CPI), White(Congress), Green(ML JDS etc), Saffron(BJP..etc) ..etc be associated with a political-companies/Identities? Companies as in Association, congregation or party of people)
And why are Green, Yellow/Red/Vermillion & White in flags etc.. associated with religious-companies/Identities..
If so what is or are Color/colors of Secularity?
Many people with less of self-introspection and more of critical prejudice over others make snap-judgements & accuse others by labelling them as ‘X’ where X can be any nomer Communist Urban-naxal, Samjhi, bhangi, etc..
There is a Sagar Manthan not between 2 but by three factors..
Rationality(Logic), Religionality(Ethos) & Politicality(Pathos). Due to a de-secular system Rationality is being outnumbered by Religionality and Politicality.
Public Logic and Justice is being suppressed, silenced or stilled by superstitions, NepoOrganiNepotistismzational-commercial Powers.
The Triad and TriColors of India:
Saffron-Gandhi, Green-Bose & White-Blue of Ambedkar.
Things to Boycott (art-articles), BAN(Acts) and Banish(People) are Smoking, Drinking-drugs or alcohol, Littering, polluting, human & child abusing, misusing, trafficking, prostitution, Pornography, criminals, real traitors and anti-constitunal and Anti-human Criminals.
War between Majoritarianism of Nationalistic Meiteis (Socio-Political Valley-Resources Power) & Transnationalistic power of Kukis (Religio-OpiuMaterial Hill-advantage Power).
We see There are 2 Kinds of Political Interventions:
1. is Political-Interference where the Situation is manipulated and escalated for political milages, shorterm wrongful gain to some(Criminals) and longterm wrongful loss to many(Innocents) (public disharmony and ILLfare) other is
2. Political-Interclearence where situation is resolved by bringing understanding and resolution by administering proper justice to the system. It may be shorttermrightful loss to few offenders-criminals but longterm rightful gain for many innocents-sheeple. Leads to Public Harmony and Social Welfare.
Do You think A. after 20 Years is History Repeating itself or B. for 2500+years its been Repeating, but its only Videographed more now?
The Challenge is To Restore Constitutionality_First Over Ethnicity, Religionality, Political Partyality, Clasteedality, Religiousity or Genderity, other sub_Constitutional-Identityology..etc.
The World has enough for everyone’s need, but not enough for Even-one’s Greed. _GRP.
Why Indian Adic-BahujanMoolNivasi Ideologues, Women, Men, clans, group-identity, symbols, Icons and similar Egalitarians are the most targeted, abused and victimized group and section of humanity.? And on the opposite spectrum why the Non_adic-ParadesijanExpansioNivasi Ideologues, men & Women canbe the most targetive, abusive or victimizing group and section of humanity?
The Two Shlokas or Maxims of Ideologies can be observed here.
1. Loka Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu. (Let whole world be happy I Wish). Expressed-Overt Maxim Eg. Of embodiment of Egalitarianism= Buddha (Introspective-Collaborstive), Bodhidharma (Educationist-Self Defence), Bahubali, Basavanna. .etc this is the Intent of Contented_Harmonisers. The Inclusive Integrators with Integrity. INDIA_TEAM_A
2. Loka Samastha mama Kadmome Bahavanthu. (Let the whole world be under my feet, I Wish). Implicit-covert maxim Eg. Of embodied entities Ceasers (Seizer) & Cleopatra (Clingoparte) , Alexander (Expander), Ashoka (Expansionist-Competitive), Genghis Khan (Gents-Jizz Clan), Ghazni-Ghori-Babar (Jizzni-Gory-Barbaric), Bin laden-Taliban-ISIS, Dawood, Constantine, Oligarchs, Hitler-Mao-Gadhafi-IdiAmin, ..etc. Intent of Greedy_Aggressionisers. The Exclusive disintegraters with impunity. India Team_B.
Team-Bully’s “Supremacistic Formula” for Sociological_Terroring of Abuse_Events = Ideological_Erroring (of few greedy Rulers) + Mobological_Mirroring (of many-poor Ruled). Based on Irrational-Immoral Liedeology. Effects: Monopolistic-Exclusive-Expansionist-Power+Resource_Accumulation.
Team-Ally’s “Egalitarianic Formula” for Sociological_Securering of Harmonic-Events = Ideological_Correcting (of many deedy Rolers) + Morphological_Mirroring (of many-core allyers). Based on rational-ethical Strideology.
Why a Tribal-Bahujan Indian sister Can become the proud President of the nation, while Similar Tribal-Bahujan Indian sister can become the targeted incident of the nation ?
Marked borders and places of Importance to Indian Geo-Religio-Politics of Clasteed.
The Immediate Causes maybe Different But the end effect and result can be same why?
Because the triggering-factors (Religiousity and Ethnicity) can be different but the driving-factors (Ecology-Situation_Stage) & root-causes (Ideology-Supremacism_Actors) are closely similar.
Commonalities between 6.Gujarat & 4.Manipur.
1. Both are Border States.
2. Both have Majoritarian Ethnic-Religious group as the dominant ruling party and represented in Government and Police. 53+Percent of Population. They have More political & police power.
3. The Same party of the State is at the Center or union at time of riots.
5. Ruling CM is Well Connected with the ruling PM and also belongs to the State-Majoritarian ideological ethnic & religious group.
6. Death Tolls: 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus (official) 1,926 to 2,000+ total
7. ModusOperandi: Gujarati Hindu Mobs attacking Muslim Mohallas & Gujarati Muslim Mobs attacking Hindu Homes.
Valley-Based Meiteis groups Vs Hill-Based Kuki groups.
City-State based Organized Invaders Vs Rural-Based decentralized unorganized inhabitors.
If it was a Gender-Crime Why the women from the Assaulting Clan group Meitei-Women not protesting and supporting the rape & assault of Kuki-Women?
This is clearly a Supremacistic Crime of one Dominant Majoritarian group enabled by the political establishment in its crimes and genocidal-atrocities against minorities and non-dominant groups.
7. Gujarat: Billkis Bano-Indian Gangrape Case, no video evidence.
Manipur: Kuki Indian -1 & Kuki-Indian-2 gangrape, video evidence.
The Differences Between Extreme event at Gujarat2002 & Manipur2023.
Gujarat Demographics:
Manipur Demographics
By Kuki are about 30,000 Meitei population is 1,522,132.. that’s a Maj:Min Ratio 0f 1:500.
The Brief Intro To 2 Incidents;
1. Gujarat Riots 2002. A inter religious groups clash between a State Majoritarian Dominative-Aggresivelocal-Politicallyresourceful Group with Rightwing-Ideology decimated destroyed, killed and raped the minority once-Dominant resourceless group with impunity and silence by the police and state machinery as the CM was belonging to the majority and dominant group. It lead to escalation by political-negligence and misgovernance of police and civic Societies. Supremacists are normally agressive when enabled by mob-impunity the rioters get neurohormonally_verbally-criminally aggressive.
A inter ethnic groups clash between a State Majoritarian Dominative-Aggresivelocal-Politicallyresourceful Group with Rightwing-Ideology targets, destroys, killed and raped the minority non-dominant resourceless group without security and silenced by the police and state machinery as the CM was belonging to the majority and dominant group. It leads to escalation by political-negligence and misgovernance of police and civic Societies. Supremacists are normally agressive when enabled by mob-impunity they get criminally aggressive mob-mentality.
More Detailed Narrative:
The Tale of Two Teams of India: Team_A and Team-B.
Just Catching, prisoning or ending the lives of culprits can not be enough. We see the case in Bilkis Bano Case, they will return to be honored by the majoritarian clan. Or Nirbhaya case did it stop urban rapes in Hyderabad or other cities..?
What is required is setting 3 Critical Precidents.
1. Punishment to the Culprits/Mob-Rioters/Police officers/Authorities. (They are just the Fruits-Limbs-Genitalia).
2. Punishment to the Cultivation, organizations, political parties, (Stem-Body-Organs)
3. Ending the Toxic-Culture of X-Supremacisms (X= Intersectional Sum of (Ethnicity, Language, Religion, caste, class etc). (Root-Brain-Neurons).
There are many more unvideoed, Photographed or Reported.
And to the Question of what made the Silent-PM speak after 2 months of the event..Was it Conscience or Consequence?..
Read this: PM spoke due to the fear of the Consequences from the Keepers of the Conscience and the Constitution, 1 the Indian Public & 2 the Supreme court of India.
*Disclaimer:* Below is not my Words but a Msg from Whatsapp being Forwarded without any authorship Signed hence opened source.:
” The Kuki Community claimed these are Village Defence force with simple guns to protect their village. But their attempt to create military-grade war weapons stands as a grave concern. These individuals, far from being common people, possess specialized knowledge and training that enable them to construct deadly tools of destruction.
Their skill sets encompass a deep understanding of weaponry, tactics, and unconventional warfare. Regrettably, some of these individuals have turned their knowledge and expertise towards developing military-grade war weapons, posing a significant threat to the security of the Meiteis.
Violence in Manipur is Beneficial for India
How?
Truth of Manipur Kalaya Tasmai Namah
There is hue & cry everywhere.. Manipur is burning……….But what is the truth?
The truth is that the present BJP government has ended the opium business in Manipur. The government has destroyed over 18,000 acres of opium plantations in the last 5 years.
Those who were harmed made it into a tribal conflict between kuki & Maiti. Initially in Manipur, the common man was getting killed. Everyone was silent.
Then the army landed on the ground.. Terrorists were killed.
Many temples & places of worship of the local residents were burn. Everyone remained silent.
Immediately the video of Sonia Gandhi came…
Why were Sonia, Uddhav, Mamta, Kejriwal and Akhilesh Yadav sad over Manipur violence?
Why they werent sad over the incident in Bhopal where a Hindu youth was paraded like a dog??
Know a clear reason why the opposition party is sad over the Manipur violence.
The natives of Manipur are the Maiti Tribals.
Before independence, there were fierce wars between the kings of Manipur. At thatvtime, many weak Maiti Kings took a large number of Kuki & Rohingya warriors from the neighbouring Myanmar in their army.
Aftet the war, slowly these Kuki warriors started making their residence in Manipur & started raising families.
Soon the Kuki population started increasing rapidly.
They were extremely aggressive & the Kukis occupied the high hills of Manipur. They chased away the Maiti Tribals from there. The Maiti tribals fled and started living in the plains of Manipur.
Foreign Kukis and Rohingyas started cultivating opium in the high hills of Manipur.
As we know, Manipur is bordered by China and Myanmar. China started eyeing Manipur and started helping anti-India parties Pakistan also started infiltrating into Manipur through Rohingya Muslims of Myanmar.
But the biggest conspiracy was created by the Christian Missionaries. Missionaries built more than 2,000 Churches in the tribal areas of Manipur and Christian missionaries began a program of rapid conversion. In this process, most of the Maiti Tribals were converted to Christianity.
Manipur was continuously involved in fierce violence in the year 1981. Indira Gandhi was the then Prime Minister. More than 10,000 Maiti Tribals were killed in that biolence. After that Indira Gandhi woke up and the army was sent and somehow peace was established. In the peace agreement, it was decided that Maiti would live in the plains and Kuki would live on the hills above. Due to this arrangement peace was made.
In this, the native Maiti suffered a lot. Gradually, the Kuki, Rohingya & Naga communities started large-scale cultivation of opium in the high hills of Manipur. Cultivation of opium started in thousands of fields. Trade worth trillions of rupees started. Due to this, the drug mafia and terrorist organizations became active and weapons were supplied freely.
In the year 2008, a fierce civil started again. Then on the instructions of Sonia Gandhi, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s Government, along with Kuki & Converted Christians, made an agreement with the Maiti Tribals. The Govt. by gave official recognition to the cultivation of opium in the high hills of Manipur.
Police was instructed not to take action. After this, drugs started being sent rapidly from Manipur to the whole of India. Manipur became the Golden Triangle of narcotics. With financial help from China, Afghanistan, Pakistan & Myanmar, the opium grown from Manipur was sent to other states of India. States like Punjab got badly affected as the youth took to drugs.
But in the year 2014 there was a change in the Government at the center.
The eyes of the Central Government was on entire India, where religious conversions were taking place. Hindus were seen to be danger. The states who were trying to separate themselves from India were identified. Slow action started in these states. In Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Tamil Nadu.
Based on intelligence, the Central Government started working secretly.
Central Govt. got success in Jammu Kashmir & in Assam. In the assembly elections of the year 2023, Bharatiya Janata Party got success in Manipur for the first time and Virender Singh, who came from Congress to BJP, was made Chief Minister by Bharatiya Janata Party. Chief Minister Virendra Singh of Maiti community has been doing politics in Manipur for 30 years and he knew the basic problem of Manipur. Virendra Singh himself comes from the Maiti community. He knew about the tribal crisis. Narendra Modi and Amit Shah instructed Virendra Singh to destroy opium cultivation.
After this, Chief Minister Virendra Singh attacked opium cultivation and destroyed thousands of acres of opium plantations.
Coinciding with this, there were disturbances in China and Pakistan. They somehow wanted to re-start opium cultivation again in Manipur.
Even before independence, the Maiti community had the status of a tribal society and used to come under the ST category. But after independence, the then Central Government took out the ST status from the Maiti community and made the Christian Missionary and Kuki community ST. Maiti people got angry with this and started showing continuous anger. Due to this, violence was taking place in Manipur again and again. In the year 2010, Maiti Samaj filed a petition in the High Court and demanded to be included in the ST category. In the year 2023, the High Court accepted the claim of Maiti Samaj and issued orders to re-include Maiti Samaj in the tribal category. Since the Christian & the Kuki people were angry with the stoppage of opium cultivation and stopping the spread of religion by the missionaries, they took full advantage of the High Court’s order and set fire to Manipur.
Today the violence that is being seen in Manipur has been beneficial for India because Maiti community has destroyed about 300 churches of Christian Missionaries. Christian Missionaries are being attacked. Now, Kukis are being chased away from wherever they are in Manipur.
What is happening is beneficial for India.
Otherwise, Manipur was soon on the way to become a new country.
Had the BJP government not been formed in the year 2014, China would have gradually occupied Manipur.
But very cleverly, the Modi government started giving their rights to the native Indians in Manipur.
For the last 70 years, Manipur was ruled by the Congress. After looking to BJP, all the opposition parties are angry. Christian Missionaries are defaming the Modi Government for the violence in Manipur.
The general public does not know that the violence of Manipur is very necessary for India.
Read this post thoroughly and forward it so that people will know what is the real reason for the violence in Manipur. Let people know who are the traitors.
Traitors are the Congress, the media, the paid journalists.
Now the media is showing that the Crown Prince of Congress visiting Manipur to save Christians & the Rohingyas.
All this is happening due to instructions of Congress & *Sonia Gandhi.*”
A political cartoon depicting Political Silence Fuels Social Violence source in photo watermark.This happened last year in Neighboring Nation Myanmar similar aspirations of Drug lords in Manipur is Possible. ihttps://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/drug-trafficking-surging-year-since-myanmar-coup-2022-02-01/Some Information and Misinformation about Manipur from an Insider-Indian reporting to an Outsider_Non-Indians.: https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2019-10/india-northeast-region-manipur-imphal-archbishop-lumon-interview.html
that is mix of many colors.. similarly there is color of ethnicity(Tribals Vs Valley People), Religiousity(Adic Vs Abrahamic) and Criminality(Drug Growers Vs Opposers).
Like a Japanese cake from outside superficially one may see a color but when one cuts deep can see the multiple layers in it.
Also Classteed Discrimination in India and other colonized nations are an outcome of Multi-generational invasions on the native people. Occurring even today.. that’s why conflicts of 2 polarized bharats we are witnessing since ages.. the social-solutions need to *Recognize, Reason & Resolve.*.. but due to implicit biases in systems all 3 phases are being impaired. The root is to empower de-biasing process of individuals and communities.
Tributes to Bangalore-MaPa. Not Bengaluru-Matha or Bengaluru-Appa but both as a Parent(Bengaluru-MaPa).
Yours Truly A Bengalurean Cityzen of 3 Decades shares about his Beloved_City being Garden Vs Gang-Den/De-Gardened/ Garbage City, I Love Bangalore (Scientific & Spiritual) and also Fear for its Future Cultural Changes.
This post expresses the 2-Sides of Bangalore one that Helps all its Citizens & Other that Hurts the Vulnerable-Cityzens.
Be aware of the Good-Egalitarian Bangalore & Beware of the Bad-Supremacistic Bangalore.
Also a Cyber-Wise Rescue city Vs Cyber-Crime Pscho City, Civilizing vs Criminalizing City, Pub Vs Club City, Pensioners Paradise Vs Pensioners Hell City.
The 1. Rational-Scientific & Liberal-Progressive/ RealSecular Satvic Bangalore, co_exists with an Radical_Cultic & Conservative Oxy-Orthodox/Liberandu-Regressive/Sickular Tamsick_Bangalore.
The good Times and bad Crimes of Bangalore..
A Tonic-Bangalore City Culture Vs a Toxic-Bangalore City Culture.
Bangalore-MaPa(Not Matha or Appa) but a Gender Inclusive MaPa. Feeds the needs of both the Vulnerable-Victims and Covert-Criminals.
There will be few Friendies, few Frenemies, many neutries and few Enemies in Bangalore.
Face-1: The Bang of Bangalore. (POSITIVE_Tonic Bangalore)
Face-2: The Allure of Bang-allure. (Negative_Toxic Bangalore)
Bangalore is a sophisticated City of Contrasts. Both we see as Empathifying-Bangalore empathifies citizens Vs Narcifying-Bangalore narcifies Criminals.
Scientific Bangalore: https://carbon.scigalleryblr.org/programmes?p=carbon-walkthrough-16 Lets *Cycle4Science:* We are planning for a SCI-cling🚲 and meetup event at this Science Gallery in Bangalore Tomorrow.. Interested members can connect here Cycle4Science: ESPians Motto: *Love For Science, Live By Science, Lead With Science.*
Let’s Unite to “Educate, Agitate, Organize.” _ Dr.Ambedkar
Deeply Exploring & Explaining these 3 Words & Concepts their Roots, Shoots & Fruits.
Ambedkar’s3 main Ideological-Influences of life: Are the 3 positive personalities & related Eu-Ideologies of
1. Jyothi Rao Phule (Educate-for Rationalism of Masses I.e Innocent-Sheeple. JR Founded SatyaShodak Samaj in India).
2. Gautama Buddha (Agitate for Egalitarianism against Supremacism of Narc-Systems I.e Arrogant-Elites/Tyrants/Wolves Founder of Original Buddhism 1.0).
3. John Dewey (Organize-with Pragmatism of Just_Egalitarians I.e Resilient-Guardians/Sheepdogs). Philosopher & Research Academic Guide of Ambedkar.
All the 3 above Personalities were challengers of Status-Quo and Systems-Reformers, Which helped Dear_Ambedkar become Dr. Ambedkar.
Its cyclically a triad, Ambedkar wanted to positively impact all 3 spheres of 1. Education by Rationalism (in Societies-Culture for Equality), 2. Agitations by Egalitarianism in Politics for Justice. & 3. Organizations by Pragmatism in Constitutions & Religions for Fraternity of all Citizens.
Ambedkar was a voracious reader, researcher & Writer. He was a Democratic-Socialist by ideology of his guide Prof. John Dewey.
The Mission to Transform India for a more Egalitarian, Ethical, Rational & Constitutional India was set as per Ambedkars Visions and Aspirations for the Egalitarians.
When we try to decode the enigma Babasaheb we find he was at core a “Rational-Pragmatic_Egalitarian” Rational(Phule) & Pragmatic(Dewey) Egalitarian(Buddha). He rejected most top 3+ Major Religions of his time and Chose a Rational: Atheistic-IndicReligion of Buddhism and tweaked for current times as Navayana or Navayanism for furthering the Causes of Justice, Equality & Fraternity. https://grpvcare2dare.design.blog/2023/07/20/s326-ambedkars-tri-slogan-tri-mantra-decoding-ambedkars-code/
Ally Place for Rationalism. *ResrcGrp:* Place 4 Rationalism, Scientific-Temper, Atheism& Secularism and sharing Concepts of open, deep-tech(A.I, ML..etc) & Free_Sciencers.
Why Buddhism? Chosen by Ambedkar over other 20 other Religions in India?
Below text is post by an our intellectual friend Mr Mangesh Dahieale from Secundarabad. Recommended reading.
Buddhist Approach to Knowledge Production
As we all know that the world is subjected to change, impermanence, decay, and death. All the physical things are undergoing change. However, when we study the biological entities, like life, it appears to be changing fast in terms of the individual species, but on the level of life, the DNA appears to be in existence forever, if we consider the deep history of life on the earth. The ability to replicate goes on with the information is repeated in all the life forms. Yes, the individual species does not long last, but the life as such goes on. This continuation of the information is due to replication, but the replication is subjected to environmental interactions. This dynamic interaction gives rise to knowledge that create resilient species to the change. This knowledge in the species is for the survival. The two key terms introduced by Darwin are ” Variance ” and ” natural selection ” which leads to evolution of the species without any creator.
Chiara Marletto, in her fascinating book the Science of Can and Can’t, explains that there is another resilient entity ( or let us call it system). That is, thinking, the world of ideas. The knowledge is produced by virtue of two operators, conjectures and criticism. The evolutionary equivalents of variance and natural selection are conjectures and criticism in the knowledge production. MarIetto’s book is about science and in itself a fascinating read. But we will cull these two important ideas of conjectures and criticism for our use here. It is the knowledge, in the biological system and human societies, that can create survival or continuation. Knowledge production is essential for the evolution of the societies and their continuation.
That no knowledge is final and nothing is infallible is the important feature of the knowledge production in Buddhism. The Buddha never accepted anything as infallible. This led to flowering of the philosophy, philosophical ideas, systems of thoughts in the Indian subcontinent. This led to creation of inquiring, inquisitive, and open society. In a nutshell, it helped to evolve human societies, before the thinking society was countered with the violent forces. The emergence of knowledge society has also helped the rival systems of thoughts to revise, rethink, and reformulate. The process of knowledge production came to the grinding halt in the Indian subcontinent only to be continued by the truth seekers (sants, derived from the Indic root reflecting truth, sat ) such as Kabir, Ravidas, to name a few, who majorly came from the masses.
The knowledge produced by the Buddhists is not lost to the time. It exists in the form of manuscripts available even today. The Buddhist thinkers today have access to the rich knowledge. But the environment has changed a lot, particularly, the man – made environment in terms of technologies, communication, habitation, and even climate.
The rival system of thoughts of Buddhism, the brahmanism tried to locate the source of all knowledge in the Vedas and continued to preach the sacredness and infallibility of the Vedas, thus creating a dead, fossilised, and hieratic philosophical system. It cannot survive the dynamic environment, but still is resilient, causing unprecedented damage to the humanity. Its modern avatars, Nazism and Fascism, were destroyed by force.
Karl Popper, one of the advocates of the fallibilism, that nothing is final or infallible, prefered evolutionary reforms over revolutions. The debate perhaps goes back to Thomas Paine and Edmund Burke during the French Revolution. It goes back to the Buddha’s time. To take sides is not easy. However, one can not discount the fact that production of knowledge, reconstruction of the past knowledge, and inquiring into possibilities of newer knowledge is critical for human race.
What is the Buddhist position on knowledge production ?
As the Buddha is evolutionary in his thinking, he encouraged thinking, which essentially involves questioning. In the Early Buddhist Texts, the Buddha is questioned by all sort of people. When the Buddha was alive, he interacted with the people, at times, counter questioning them directly or rhetorically. Questioning the Buddha and his answers have been handed down to us as the knowledge produced by the rigorous questions and answers. This implies that we can question the Buddha today with the new questions. The living Buddha is not there to answer but left enough behind to make conjectures ( like he did) and apply critical thinking (again what he did as well).
On limits of language/concepts and contemplating one’s own mind
The Buddha used language in an innovative ways. In the process of knowledge production, he invented new language, terms, conceptual frameworks. His most important insight was that there is a limit to language and concepts. However, they are necessary means to contemplate and understand.
The Buddha taught using languages and concepts to know the basis of all the experiences, the mind itself. Though the efforts are now made to know the mind empirically, the Buddha offered methods to know the mind. This knowledge to know the human mind is handed over to us, but with a caveat that one apply the methods. The methods lead to cessation of signs, languages, and stilling of mind which is source of all human experiences. This going beyond the grasp of language and conceptual framework is nirvana. This is the ultimate realization, but this experience when emerged out of it informs all the interactions with the world of humans and environment prompting higher planes of existence for all.
Like in Modern Times people Consumers of Telecom-Services can Change their Phone-Network with same Phone-Number called at MNP (Mobile Number Portability) similarly Religious-Services can be changed with Religious Member Portability (RMP) where religious services is dependent less by–chance of birth-clanhome or adopted-family but is more by-choice and by well-informed decision of existing-options. By Birth one can belong to parental-religion/nation and by choice one can get Visa or Religionship(Like Citizenship) of a rational and better serving religion.
1. Ugly-designed CievilCode or 2. UltiMATEly-designed Civilizing Code.
Everthing Depends on Participation of the Baseful_BASISED in Facts from Intellectuals+Academia & Committed Citizenry (i.e Neo_Politics V5.0) Vs the Baseless_BIASED by fiction of Vested-Interests & Committed_Tyranny (Old_Politics 1-4.0).
Rooted for Our Nation, Our Needs & Our Reforms towards Our Futures. UCC for India can be for safety & security of families & it can turn out to be the greatest remedy (Medicine), comedy (Mistake) or tragedy (Malice), it depends on the principles of the Communities (Minds) creating & implementing it. We Sow what we reaped, and reap what we sowed.
Visions to Divorce-proof & create Sustainable-families by Safey-fying well-informed & formed Marriages & Reduce Ill-informed Damages.
Whether marriages are made in Heaven, Havan or in Oven. Depends on the two or more Inter_family Mothers-In-laws & Ideological Compatibility between the partnering-spouses in many cases where the Mothers-belief or mater-Religion/ideology hold the remote control of the minds & relational life choices of children & family members.
Can Share about UCC Suggestions @ .Gov.in
This link and PDF mailed to the Law Commission India.. they have Access to this page can be updated or commented.Civis-Links are nested in the blog-below..
Top 4 Better_UCCSources of Suggestions here, feel free to take any, add more and Cite them and fill for the UCC suggestions. Neglect our social duty at own and others risk. Or Do it for Safety of all. Please Care, Share & Amplify this Call2 Action.
Our Opportunity for Better_Indian Familial_Systems.
Like it or not This is going to affect us all at the roots. If we act rationally it can be better, if we neglect or let others make it irrational, it can get worse. Be aware, Be Warned.
UCC can accommodate different customs/requirements of tribals, sects, regions & genders, by including them as options along with secular rational UCC option for each life stage/circumstance in a Pre-marital agreement. Each couple can mix, match, choose & finalize as per their individual requirements.
A pre-marital agreement should be mandated to be filled & signed by each couple before wedding. A detailed list will bring clarity & mutual understanding of each other’s expectations, wishes, preferences, rights, responsibilities, spending style, parenting approach & plans for a married life as well as how to handle divorce.
Write a list of family issues & legal suggestions. Get reviewed by a psychologist & law professor.
Some more Info Sourced from Indra in Wewadh Debates Group.
The current mediation system is lethargic and biased need to improve it and setup a pre-marital contract Negotiation and mutual due diligence system. So that Love-Frauds can be filtered out and only Genuine-Marriers can be married. This would be shit-proofing the shitty-risky Indian Marital Systems.
Feedback Points on Uniform Civil Code by Vivek Deveshwar is marked with CC0 1.0 Universal CC0 1.0 CC0 1.0 Universal
Introduction
This document is being provided as a collaborative effort of individuals with various points of feedback on proposed Uniform Civil Code. Interested people can study it and send their own feedback points.
Collaborative and read-only stable versions of this document
This is a read only stable version of the document. For people interested in studying UCC and adding own points for benefit of public, they can do so in the collaborative edit version: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15sciKERTSpXbodDEZmWqHXEJ66NJnehxLrAIxfzkloQ/edit?usp=sharing Useful points from the collaborative version will be updated into this document regularly. Note: the document will remain in public domain as given in the Public Domain License section above. Sl No Document version Changes 1 20230618_1 Initial points on age of consent, marriage; VC Hearing, Alimony, Maintenance, Child Custody 2 20230618_2 Added summary of California, Texas, Massachusetts alimony laws 3 20230709_3 Overhauled. More structured headings. Added points as per Live Discussion 4 20230713_4 Added: Unify matrimonial litigations, more suggestions to FPC, forms for routine IAs, claim compensation for false allegations, aadhaar for fraud prevention,
Current Document Version: 20230713_4
Alimony Reforms
Duration of Marriage
Duration of marriage should be codified into alimony consideration and calculation: Under Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), there is no concept of duration of marriage in deciding on alimony amount. This leads to very unfair and unequal treatment where a wife who stayed with husbands for few days or weeks gets treated on par with a wife who has lived married life for 20 years before separation. Supreme Court has mentioned about duration of marriage in Rajnesh vs Neha judgment. However, this needs to be brought into statute in a proper codified manner. Just as an example, below is Texas, US law on deciding alimony based on duration of marriage: https://texaslawhelp.org/article/spousal-maintenance-alimony
Supreme Court in Rajnesh vs Neha 2020 judgment (page 37) has recognized that duration of marriage should be a factor in determining amount of alimony award and lifetime alimony will be inequitable on husband for short duration marriage:
Permanent alimony (i) Parties may lead oral and documentary evidence with respect to income, expenditure, standard of living, etc. before the concerned Court, for fixing the permanent alimony payable to the spouse. (ii) In contemporary society, where several marriages do not last for a reasonable length of time, it may be inequitable to direct the contesting spouse to pay permanent alimony to the applicant for the rest of her life. The duration of the marriage would be a relevant factor to be taken into consideration for determining the permanent alimony to be paid.
Lifetime alimony when no children is bad public policy: Also, it is seen that many women become eligible for awards of lifetime alimony for relatively short marriage and no children in marriage. It is unjust on men and their families who are burdened with a huge financial outlay for no fault. It is again unjust by not differentiating between women who contribute in marriage for decades and then separate and those who stay for a few months or 1-2 years at maximum.
Reference: Summary of how alimony varies by duration of marriage in few states of US
Summary of Alimony laws in few states of United States limiting time of alimony (monthly) based on duration of marriage
California
For marriages that lasted less than 10 years, the general guideline is that spousal support may last for a period equal to half the length of the marriage. However, this is not an absolute rule, and the court has discretion to deviate from it based on other relevant factors. For marriages that lasted 10 years or more, there is no presumption or guideline regarding the duration of spousal support. In such cases, the court has broader discretion to determine the length of support, and it may continue for an indefinite period, especially in long-term marriages where one spouse has a demonstrated need for support and the other has the ability to pay. It’s important to note that spousal support orders can be modified or terminated based on a significant change in circumstances, such as the supported spouse becoming self-supporting or the paying spouse experiencing a significant decrease in income.
Texas
In Texas, alimony is referred to as “spousal maintenance.” The Texas Family Code provides guidelines for the duration of spousal maintenance based on the length of the marriage. For marriages that lasted less than 10 years, the maximum duration of spousal maintenance is generally limited to five years. However, the court may order a shorter or longer duration depending on the specific circumstances of the case. For marriages that lasted between 10 and 20 years, the maximum duration of spousal maintenance is typically up to five years. However, if the court determines that the spouse seeking maintenance has a disability or is the primary caregiver of a child with a disability, the duration can be extended up to ten years. For marriages that lasted 20 years or more, the court can order spousal maintenance for a maximum duration of up to ten years. It’s important to note that these are general guidelines, and the court has discretion to deviate from them based on various factors. The court will consider factors such as the spouse’s ability to provide for their own needs, their education and employment skills, the age and health of the spouses, and any history of family violence, among others. Additionally, spousal maintenance can be modified or terminated under certain circumstances, such as the remarriage of the recipient spouse or a substantial change in the financial situation of either spouse.
Massachusetts
In Massachusetts, the duration of alimony is determined based on the length of the marriage. The Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act, which went into effect in 2012, provides guidelines for the duration of alimony payments. For marriages that lasted up to 5 years, the general rule is that alimony may be awarded for a period of up to 50% of the length of the marriage. For marriages that lasted between 5 and 10 years, the duration of alimony can be up to 60% of the length of the marriage. For marriages that lasted between 10 and 15 years, the duration of alimony can be up to 70% of the length of the marriage. For marriages that lasted between 15 and 20 years, the duration of alimony can be up to 80% of the length of the marriage. For marriages that lasted more than 20 years, the court may award alimony for an indefinite duration, without a specific time limit, unless there is a reason to set an end date. It’s important to note that these guidelines provide a framework, but the court has discretion to deviate from them based on various factors. The court considers factors such as the length of the marriage, the income and earning capacity of each spouse, the age and health of the parties, the ability to become self-supporting, and the financial and non-financial contributions made during the marriage. Furthermore, alimony orders can be modified or terminated upon a substantial change in circumstances, such as the recipient spouse’s remarriage, cohabitation, or a significant change in the financial situation of either spouse.
Fault of Spouse in determination of Alimony
Fault of spouse: Fault of a spouse e.g. Cruelty, Adultery, Desertion under HMA should be a core consideration in deciding amount of alimony. A faulting spouse should lose benefits or reliefs so that there is incentive in society to treat the matrimonial bond with sanctity and respect. Currently, it’s the opposite with a faulting spouse (usually wife) who may get almost the same award of alimony even if her husband gets divorce by proving her cruelty.
To create a balance of incentives and disincentives and also to preserve sanctity of marriage, a faulting spouse e.g. who does adultery or cruelty may be burdened with a higher alimony amount than may be otherwise ordered as per current laws.
Maintenance Reforms
Allow only single maintenance petition (and if needed amendments to it can be made)
Filing of Multiple maintenance petitions: The plethora of personal laws regarding maintenance like HMA Section 24, HAMA sections, and CrPC 125 and PWDVA need to be harmonized and inconsistencies removed. It should be made mandatory for a maintenance claimant to file one maintenance case under any of these laws. Filing a single case only for a cause of action is also a generally accepted good practice under procedural laws. Current practice allows multiple maintenance cases to be filed (sometimes across multiple states) which is like seeking the same economic / financial relief multiple times and it is neither common sense, nor sensible from the point of view of reducing unnecessary burden on courts where many other litigants are waiting patiently for years.
Create disincentives for able-bodied and qualified women to sit idle
Married women (especially without children) must not be incentivized to sit idle: Current maintenance laws like CrPC 125, DV Act are too lax in the sense that with the object of providing relief to destitute or oppressed women, they have gone overboard in granting huge maintenance amounts to women who are able-bodied, qualified, and can very well do some paid work but they willingly incapacitate themselves. MP HC has said in similar words in Mamta Jaiswal judgment in 2000 (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1728023/) that law regarding maintenance should not become an excuse for a qualified wife to sit idle. Unfortunately, the subsequent case law has tended to ignore the principle that society cannot incentivize people to sit idle and have free lunch at someone else’s expense. And so it is commonly seen in judgments that a woman cannot be expected to work just because she is qualified. Not even a mention is made of any circumstances which have hampered her from searching for or doing a job.
Treating women as the weaker section of society is not a sound interpretation in 2023 when in many judgments by HCs and SC women are given equal privileges and benefits as men based on Right to Equality under Article 14. But in judgments related to maintenance, the paradigm of women as weaker class seems to be prevalent presumably also due to Article 15(3). But this dichotomy of interpretations vis a vis women’s rights is leading to confusion among general public is unable to understand how women are equal to men in certain scenarios e.g. regarding perks and emoluments, but also women are the weaker section of society when it’s about maintenance and alimony. In the case of husbands, it is commonly held that he has to provide maintenance for wife even if he has to do physical labour. But for a woman she is not supposed to work even if she is able-bodied and qualified. Such a divergent interpretation of laws based only on gender will create perverse incentives and destabilize the institution of marriage. It cannot be a sensible way to create healthy families and society.
Let all able-bodied women seeking maintenance at least do community or honorary work: Going further, if a woman without children seeking maintenance tries to find work but is unable to (and proof is provided to the court), then the court must ask her to spend similar hours in a week in a community centre, NGO, hospital, aanganwadi etc so that society can benefit from her efforts and talent and the taxpayer money spent on subsidized education, and she can also gain valuable experience which will help her to find paid work in future. It will also reduce incentives from voluntarily incapacitation of oneself.
Interim Maintenance award should be made within 3-6 months and duration of interim maintenance should be limited to 6 months to 1 year: The concept of interim maintenance has evolved to grant maintenance to wives while the main case is pending. However, it creates perverse incentives to file a false case on the husband with concocted allegations, get an interim maintenance order, and then enjoy interim maintenance and stop coming to court to finish the trial in a time bound manner. Even if the husband is able to prove wrongdoing by the wife later, he will not be able to recover the illegally obtained maintenance amount already paid and spent by the wife. The proposed solution is to make an Interim Maintenance award within 3-6 months and the duration of interim maintenance should be limited to 6 months to 1 year. Else, the only alternative solution is to finish the complete maintenance trials quickly within 3 months to 1 years maximum and pass only final maintenance orders after cross-examination, and full trial. In no other type of civil cases, the interim orders are allowed to grant so much reliefs as in maintenance cases. Such a practice is against principles of natural justice where the husband’s evidence is not even looked at and he is unable to do cross-examination of wife before grant of relief to wife. E.g. a recent judgment stated that though the husband has provided evidence of wife’s adultery, that evidence cannot be looked into at the stage of interim maintenance grant: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/maintenance-cant-be-denied-over-adultery-charges-court/articleshow/92242284.cms
Similarly faulting spouse must not be given the gift of maintenance for years altogether (also see interim maintenance duration limit above): News stories like below where allegedly adulterous women are getting interim maintenance (which they may be able to enjoy for several years) shake the confidence of law abiding citizens that those who want to use the law ‘appropriately’ can get undue benefits which may seem immoral and unethical but wholly legal in the eyes of law:
The Maintenance & Alimony amount paid by a spouse should be deducted from his/her total taxable income.
The Maintenance & Alimony received by a spouse should be made taxable in the hands of the spouse who gets paid.
Abortion without good reasons and without consent of husband should be ground for divorce
Having children and family life is one of the core reasons for the institution of marriage. In case a wife is unwilling to have children post marriage and decides to abort, a husband should not be left hanging for years altogether trying to prove cruelty in courts. It would be better to codify it as part of the statute. Also, it has been held in Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh 2007 Supreme Court judgment: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/766894/ (xi) If a husband submits himself for an operation of sterilization without medical reasons and without the consent or knowledge of his wife and similarly if the wife undergoes vasectomy or abortion without medical reason or without the consent or knowledge of her husband, such an act of the spouse may lead to mental cruelty.
Recognize Pre-Nuptial agreements and they should have overriding value
Pre-Nupital agreements for division of assets / property, alimony after divorce should be honoured by courts and should have an overriding effect or much higher weightage over other legal provisions related to property, maintenance, alimony, stridhan etc.
Pre-nuptial agreement should not allow one parent to give up parenting responsibilities of any future children born in marriage.
Amendments to laws on Stridhan
The stridhan law should be amended to take into account the duration of marriage and whether the gift was given from the wife’s family or husband’s family. I propose the following:
A wife can claim to stridhan gifted by her own family as per existing laws.
A wife can lay a legal claim to stridhan esp valuables like gold and jewellery given by husband and his family only after the duration of 10 years of living married life with husband. Duration of separation should not count (unless due to reasons of travel of spouse for job etc).
This provision will plug the loophole wherein a newly married woman can take away accumulated wealth of husband’s family in the form of gold and jewellery (and some of it handed down over generations) even after a very short period of married life.
Child Custody
Law Commission of India Report no 257 must be implemented: The laudable provisions of joint custody and shared parenting mentioned therein must be codified into statutory laws like GWC, HAMA etc. Already there are many such HC judgments where shared parenting and custody has been adopted as the right solution keeping in mind the Welfare of Child principle. Guardianship should also be shared between parents.
Deem giving up on parenting of child as against public policy: It is observed that in many mutual consent divorces, one parent (usually father) gives up all access to and parenting of the child. Whatever the circumstances in a particular case, such a practice is wholly deplorable and a civilized society must not be seen to be giving a “clean chit” to such giving up of parental responsibilities. If marriage is an institution with a core object being welfare and healthy growth of children, then giving up on parental responsibilities cannot be encouraged. Mere arranging of finances for child’s future is not a substitute for the presence and role of a parent (and grandparents, cousins, extended family) which a child needs for healthy growth and full self-expression.
The word ‘visitation’ should be removed from statutes. ‘Interim Custody’ can be used instead.
Stop incentives to make false Child abuse allegations and POCSO as tactics: It is being seen that some mothers file POCSO case or similar sexual abuse of child allegations on father just to gain advantage in child custody case, or to deny custody altogether to father. This is a highly deplorable practice. If general laws are not sufficient, then a special provision should be added to laws that any parent making such false allegations of child sexual abuse or any other form of child abuse will stand to get reduced custody and guardianship, and even lose custody rights altogether in severe cases.
Overhaul contempt laws to deal with flagrant violation of custody orders: If existing contempt of court laws are deemed to be insufficient, then provisions must be added to personal laws so that any parent violating grant of custody order to other parent must be penalized including losing custody access himself / herself.
Child support money be deposited in a separate bank account of child: It is commonly seen that maintenance amount which includes maintenance for child(ren) is given to wife. It is much better to make it mandatory that each child have a bank account where the maintenance amount be deposited. Then it becomes much easier to track inflow and outflow of funds and the probability of use of those funds on anything else except for child’s own welfare is highly reduced. Also, the accumulated funds in child’s account can be used for child’s future needs once he/she turns 18 years old.
Marriage Registration, Aadhaar, Reduce fraud in marriages
Marriage registration can make it mandatory to mention either aadhaar id or another unique id by government of India.
It is often reported that a woman (or man) is serially marrying multiple times without disclosing past marriages. It is also commonly seen that married people undergoing separation falsely state that they are divorced while their divorce is under process. To reduce this kind of fraud, a privacy protected database can be made where people can check about the existence of past or current marriages if any prospective bride / bridegroom based on aadhaar id.
To reduce the decades long litigation post marriages, the lawmakers can also deliberate upon making some disclosures related to one’s own past health, medical conditions etc to be made by both spouses as part of marriage registration. False disclosures made at this time can be held against the person in future.
VC hearing / e-filing for Matrimonial Trials
Virtual Conference Hearing should be allowed on request of either party in a matrimonial case. It is seen that in 70% of matrimonial cases (according to a social media survey) the wife files maintenance or other cases on husband in a different city, mostly the city/town of her parents where she is also residing. While this is legally correct as per HMA, CPC / CrPC 125, DV Act etc, it creates a huge logistical burden which further delays the trial and one reason why matrimonial cases take so long before disposal. Hence I suggest that with widespread adoption of technology in courts, the virtual hearing should be allowed on request of a party except where a physical presence of the party is needed like cross-examination etc. Foreign courts are already using communication technology where parties can join remotely and routine hearings and orders get passed.
Similarly e-filing should be made an option for matrimonial proceedings to reduce the burden on spouses, courts, and also increase transparency and trust in the judicial legal system
Unify matrimonial litigations, suggested amendments to CPC or FCP
Unify all matrimonial litigations to a single case and single court for holistic view of the case, and thereby also reduce burden on both spouses and courts.
Prima Facie decisions or reliefs granted thereof must not be based solely on statements made, but based on preliminary documentary evidences submitted along with application to court.
Create easy to fill templates / forms for filing of routine Interim Applications which result in verbose pleadings, counters, and so on. These are also common in other countries in matrimonial and child custody related cases.
Non-adversarial procedure in matrimonial proceedings (Family Court Procedure FCP)
There is a need to move away from Civil Code of Procedure (CPC) based procedures in matrimonial cases which are based on adversarial law. The Indian Evidence Act may need to have suitable amendments too if needed.
The current regime allows for cases to drag forever even when allegations are difficult to prove. There is incentive to make many allegations knowing well that there is no proof for most of them.
Instead, a new non-adversarial mode of procedure can be adopted by making suitable changes to the Family Courts Act for matrimonial related proceedings. Let’s call it Family Court Procedure (FCP).
The FCP will allow judges to examine and summon all kinds of records regarding both the parties like call detail records, bank statements, WhatsApp messages, and so on and the entities like telecom, banks and the spouses themselves will be bound to provide them.
The judge can then seek a negotiated reconciliation to get back together, or else a mutual divorce and alimony between the parties based on strengths or weaknesses of evidences, or give them an option to contest the cases should they choose to go forward. In the contested divorce scenario, the other alimony and maintenance provisions will apply as suggested in my feedback points (duration of marriage, faulting spouse, number of children etc).
This new procedure will result in disclosure of evidence upfront instead of waiting for 4-5 years to reach the evidence and cross examination stage. A lot of the time the general public who file matrimonial cases themselves are not aware of the strength or weakness of their own case. It will allow them to make a better attempt at reconciliation or negotiated divorce, rather than filing multiple unprovable allegations and making both spouses run around in courts for several years.
Age of Consent, age of marriage, POCSO
It has been reported in recent HC judgments where a Muslim minor girl has been allowed to marry at the age of 14-15 ( P&H HC judgment), whereas in another judgment in this year Karnataka HC has said that POCSO will override the ability to give consent for marriage. For a serious crime like POCSO, a uniformity of laws must be brought in for all citizens of India.
Practice of Constitutionalism by the Indian Judiciary for this Rational Decision of Debiasing Society.. This is a Landmark Event towards more Rationalism & Egalitarianism.
[27/11, 22:57] G.R.P )= G.R. PrasaHd =Grit+ ReaSon+ Peers) SatvyamJayam by Indigo-Indians.: UCC is one of Tools, a Mechanism, main theme or Intent & Vision is told in Video proof as in snapshot at 39seconds is “Secular-Constitution”.. Articles 25-28 & 44 are the supporting factors. Vision is Secularity in Preamble and SC judgement shares yesterday is another proof. [27/11, 23:08] G.R.P )= G.R. PrasaHd =Grit+ ReaSon+ Peers) SatvyamJayam by Indigo-Indians.: Point 3 will update with A.44.. but the make of Tool is dependent on the lawmakers. biased parties will include bias in the tools. Hence UCC can go either way it can solve or create more problems depending on political-bias depending on Party-vision & wishes.
Ever wonder how some good friendly people get Trapped in lives by their opposite-gender Narcs or (any gender Narcs in case of asexual/ non-marital relationships & their foullies-gang in Toxic-Circles & Narcic-Cycles? Here’s How and Why the “Empaths-Dictionary 2023-Toolkit”. Conceived & Created by yours empathically GRP. #EmpiesVsNarcs
There is Gynic-Rape of Indian_Sisters and Systemic-Rape of IndianBrothers. That needs to be addressed and stopped.
The real threat to world that’s more than terrorism in the backyard of nations, is the Narcissism behind backs of nationals. Why is it so? Because The Overt Terrorists We can expect and can come externally with Weapons, Gun or Bomb, poison etc visible in Hand or operated and one can defend with bullet proof vest and defensive guns.. whereas
The-Covert Malignant Narcissists we cannot expect when or where from near us they can backstab us with their evil-intent, Toxic-tongues or acts and ones who mistakenly trust them will be defenceless to their LAME-ness (Lies, Abuses, Manipulations and Exploitations). That’s Why Prevention is best Cure, and Information is best Protecture.
GRP (Narc_Prevention & Empaths Safety Resourcer).
Must read for friends who are true_Natural_empaths and also friends & family of empaths(HSP).
Welcome to the Empathosphere away from the Narcopsheres and the Empaths Portal for Empathic Perspectives. Empathy(duty of +ve care) is opposite of apathy(deep or Negative Care), SocioPathy, Psychopathy, Narcopathy etc..
Dedicated to all the empaths in my life: my Grandparents, Parents, Relatives, Friends, School College, Work mates, Neighbors and last but not least my misunderstanders, opposers, abusers and aggressors.. all the Indians & humans here who are empaths at heart and mind. Let Empaths Spread more in the world for world peace and ease.
26+ Key Concepts (A-Z) that Team_Empaths need to know about themselves and their polar opposites their Anti-thesis the Narcissists_Gang and the 3rd section of audience the Sheeple-People. This is the Game of life for Name, Dame and Fame that everyone has to play as a human.
Content-Index:
1. A2Z Differences between Empaths & Narcs Toolkits.
2. Trueom on “An Empaths Path.”
3. Resources to the Toolkits.
The Empath-Narc-Sheeple Triad in Life and Society.
1. Intro: Difference between Teams & Gangs.. Teams are created by law-abiding members for a formal, noble & moral cause for benefit and ethical-purpose. Gangs are created by law-violative members for an illegal, ignoble, immoral cause for profit of self or loss to other by unethical purposes. Are we part of a Social team or Anti-Social gang?
Below are few concepts that can help in the analysis of Situations (Phases), Sources (Places) and Servers (Persons). #Empaths_Toolkit #Empaths-Dictionary.
Empaths_Traits Vs Narcs-Traitors. Empaths Help2Heal longterm while Narcs Hurt2Harm longterm.
A- AltruismVs All4Me-ism. Ideology of doing good selflessly without any expectations in return. Not many in Society spread altruism there are rare Altruistic-Empaths based on gratitude and love4all (Their Fav-Sholka is Loka Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu, Appo Deepo Bhava), they are a in social minority, there are mostly Neutral-Sympaths who can swing as flying-monkeys being vulnerable to Opportunistic-Narcs’s manipulations. On the contrary the all4me-ism spreads Materialism and Narcissism Their fav Shloka is Aham Bhramasmi, Sarvam Mama padasmi. I am God, everthing is under my foot/control (Everything is mine alone, everyone for MY service only)
B- Backup Vs BackStabbing/ Back-Biting.
At times of need Empaths Act as Backup for all help one needs & Narcs backstab at right opportunity of the others time of need.
C- Courteous Vs Covetous & Coverteous. Courtship vs Court-Ship.
D- Delicious_Desired Vs Devious_Detested.
E- EveryTimeand Never Mentality. Statements like Evertime I want to help and never do I want to hurt you are from empaths.
While oppositely “Evertime you hurt and never are you good.” Every message You share is waste, Useless and worthless. Such words I have heard while sharing msgs in an Altruists group. Is most probably from a narcy mindcontrol.
F- For You Vs Fuk you & the World Mindset. Frauds on Humanity are The Narcs (VishwaShatrus_VishwaBandooks). Friends of Humanity are Empaths(Vishwa-Mitras/Bandus)
GRP_VCare2Dare 