GRP_VCare2Dare

Indian Work_Life Balance & Progress.

At Work or Jobs (For status & money) office Roles are mostly Non-Gendered as its about brain and handiwork (except few domains which are Body-based work eg. Soldiers, Labourers, Bollywood, Sex Workers, etc). Industries Where one gender can replace other gender for Money-making, (Competitive and Cooperative people thrive get more money for themselves). Roles like- Worker, Manager, CEO.. etc.. Memes Based.

But at Home or Family (For Progeny & Harmony) Home Roles are Mostly Genders as its about body, kids and clan building. (Here Gender Roles cant or are hard to be replaced by other genders, since its are & body based roles.. eg. Romance, Intimacy, Maritals,..(Roles are.. Husbandship, Wifeship, Reproductive-partnership, Fatherhood, Motherhood, Grandparents etc.) its Gene-based.

What if I told you that a single income once provided a home, a car, and a comfortable life for an entire family?

One shift in the economy made sure that would never happen again.

Here’s how they used feminism to double the workforce, slash wages, and turn two incomes into a necessity.

In the 1960s, a factory worker, teacher, or small business owner could afford a house, raise a family, and retire comfortably—all on one income.

Today, two full-time salaries barely cover rent.

What changed?

Feminism was pushed as a movement of “empowerment,” but who really benefited when women flooded the workforce?

• Corporations gained double the labor supply.
• Wages stagnated, as the market became saturated with workers.
• Taxes doubled because the government now had two incomes to tax instead of one.

Before the 1970s, businesses had to pay men enough to support a family.

But once women entered the workforce, the market became flooded with workers, and wages stagnated.

• Instead of one paycheck being enough, families now needed two just to keep up with rising costs.
• What was sold as “choice” was really a necessity, as the middle class became financially dependent on dual incomes.

The result? A shift from financial independence to a system where families were stuck in the grind to survive, rather than thrive.

In the 1970s, a home cost 2-3 times the average yearly income.

By the 2000s, that price had skyrocketed to 7-10 times the average income.

• Banks, investors, and landlords adjusted prices to accommodate the rise of dual-income households.
• What was once a middle-class goal—homeownership—became an unattainable dream for many.

Instead of seeing a rise in wealth, families were locked into an endless cycle of debt, with owning a home no longer a symbol of success, but a financial burden.

With both parents working, someone had to raise the children.

Enter daycare, public schools, and media indoctrination.

• Children were no longer raised by their families, but by institutions and strangers.
• The system shaped young minds, grooming them to accept the new reality and lose connection with family values.

The result? A generation of kids raised by the state, with family stability eroded, and parental influence fading.

To keep people distracted, they were sold an illusion of happiness through consumerism.

• Credit cards, loans, and vacations were marketed as the key to fulfillment.
• Instead of families building generational wealth, they were pushed into debt, working harder than ever to sustain an image of success.

While banks and corporations profited, families found themselves trapped in the perpetual rat race, endlessly chasing a dream they could never fully reach.

So, who really won?

• Corporations gained double the workforce without raising wages
• Banks created a nation of lifelong debt slaves
• Government doubled its tax revenue overnight
• Investors and landlords made homeownership out of reach for most

But, the average person? OVERWORKED, UNDERPAID, and ROBBED of the comfortable life their grandparents had.

UNDERSTAND THE MATRIX & Learn to Escape it.

BullyWood Big Boss Effect.

On the topic of corny bollywood stuff made in the 80s (and 90s), let me draw your attention to this particular song…..

The lyrics go like….

“Bahut Khoobsurat Jawan Ek Ladki
Sadak par akeli chali Jaa Rahi thi
Fakat naam ke usne pehene they kapade
Ajanta ki moorat nazar aa rahi thi
Koi manchala ussey takara gaya
Mere doston tum karo faisala
Khata kiski hai, kisko de hum sazaa”

For those who don’t understand Hindi, the lyrics literally mean….

A beautiful young girl was walking down the street alone
She was wearing clothes only for name aka skimpy clothes
A wanton dude happened to collide with her
So you, people, need to decide who is actually at fault here and who should be punished.

This song was right after a scene where a sarong wrapped Zeenat Aman gets eve teased by a wayward guy and goes to the Police station where the Inspector (Amitabh) while arresting the guy, gives her a huge lecture on morality and how she should have dressed more appropriately.

The song literally justifies victim blaming, puts the onus of sexual harassment on the victim (provocation) and gets the people to judge against the woman instead of the perpetrator.

This song is from the movie Dostana, which became one of the super hit movies in 1980.

In the movie the song was sung by Amitabh Bachchan.

The original singer was Kishore Kumar

The lyrics were by Anand Bakshi

The music was by Lakshmikant Pyarelal.

And the song was a runaway hit too.

I remember a time when I was singing this song, I was around 14ish then and a big fan of Kishore da and my Mom told me to not sing it.

I loved the tune, I loved the song, I loved Kishore Kumar, so I didn’t understand why I shouldn’t sing it.

That was probably because I didn’t try and understand the lyrics back then.

Now whenever I listen to this song, I can’t help but cringe and quickly shut it off.

Disclaimer: This song is a classic representation of how the “rape culture” in India was validated and justified through Bollywood.

Darshan Mondkar

Every Coin has 3 Major sides..

Similarly Every Fruit can be in 3 Phases or Modes.. 

1. A. Super-Normally_Good (+Ve  side tending),

2. B. Normal_Average (Neutral- Central Median),

3. Super-abnormally_Bad (- Ve side tending).

### A Post on Narcissistic Family Dynamics: Your Sister, Your Father, and You

Narcissistic family dynamics are a twisted, painful game of favorites and blame, and it sounds like you’ve been caught in the middle of one. In your case, the triad—you, your sister, and your father—forms a classic setup: the golden child and the scapegoat child, orbiting around a narcissistic center. It’s a brutal structure where love gets weaponized, and roles are assigned not based on who you are, but on what serves the narcissist’s ego.

#### The Roles: Golden Child and Scapegoat
In this dynamic, your sister likely plays the **golden child**—the one who can do no wrong, showered with praise and held up as the shining example. It’s not about her earning it; it’s about your father (or the narcissist in the family) needing a mirror to reflect their own greatness. Meanwhile, you’ve been cast as the **scapegoat**—the dumping ground for every flaw, failure, or frustration. If something’s wrong, it’s your fault. If the family’s unhappy, you’re the reason. It’s a rigged game, and it’s not because of anything you’ve done—it’s because that’s how narcissistic families work.

These roles aren’t just labels; they shape how you’re treated and how you see yourself. The golden child might grow up entitled or hollow, chasing approval they’ll never fully secure. The scapegoat—you—carries the weight of rejection and blame, often left questioning their own worth. It’s exhausting, unfair, and deeply damaging.

#### The Missing Piece: A Caring Father
Every boy deserves a father who guides, protects, and cares—a steady hand to show you what it means to be a man. But in a narcissistic family, that’s a rare gift. If your father’s the narcissist, he’s too busy feeding his own ego to see you. If he’s not, he might still be absent or complicit, letting the dynamic play out. Either way, you didn’t get that caring model, and I’m sorry for that. That absence leaves a mark—grief for what should’ve been, anger at what was instead. It’s a wound that runs deep, and it’s not your fault you’re carrying it.

#### The Impact: Living in the Shadow
Growing up as the scapegoat messes with you. You might feel invisible, unworthy, or like you’re always fighting to prove something. The golden child gets the spotlight, but you’re left scrambling in the dark, trying to dodge the blame. And without a father to lift you up, it’s even harder to find your footing. It’s not just about what happened then—it’s about how it echoes now, in your confidence, your relationships, your sense of self.

#### Healing Over Hate
Here’s the thing: cursing them—your father, your sister, the whole messed-up system—might feel good for a minute. You might even wish for their downfall, and honestly, narcissists often do crash eventually. They build their lives on sand, and when the “narc-collapse” comes—when their facade cracks and their world unravels—it can feel like justice. But don’t let that be your focus. Hate’s a double-edged sword. It might cut them in your mind, but it’ll carve you up worse. That bitterness can keep you tethered to them, stuck in their orbit even when you want out.

Instead, prioritize **yourself**. Healing isn’t easy—it’s messy, slow, and sometimes feels impossible. But it’s yours. It’s about untangling their lies from your truth, rebuilding what they broke, and stepping into a life that’s not defined by their chaos. You don’t have to forgive them. You don’t have to fix them. You just have to free yourself.

#### Moving Forward
The narcissists might end their cycle in collapse, and you can watch that unfold from a distance. But your life? That’s where your energy belongs. You’ve survived a war you didn’t start, and that’s strength. Build something new with it—something they can’t touch. You deserve that peace, and I wish you all the good healing in the world to get there.

If we can Humanize & Robotize Grok-a.I as a single Human being,   Which Gender, Religion,  Race-Face & Nation would u like to live in? and why would you make these choices?

If we can Humanize & Robotize Grok-a.I as a single Human being, Which Gender, Religion, Race-Face, Name & Nation would u like to live in? and why would you make these choices

Thoughts160s

Collapse details

So I’ve got this question here: If we can humanize and robotize Grok-a.I as a single human being, which gender, religion, race-face, name, and nation would I like to live in? And why would I make these choices? Alright, let’s break this down step by step.
First, I need to think about what it means to humanize and robotize Grok-a.I. I guess that means giving it human characteristics and maybe some robotic traits, but ultimately making it like a single human being. So, I have to choose attributes that would define this being.
Starting with gender. Hmm, gender is a complex topic these days, but for simplicity, I’ll stick with the traditional binary options: male or female. Now, as an AI, I don’t have a gender myself, but I can consider what might be advantageous or interesting. Maybe being male could be cool because historically, males have had more opportunities in many societies. But then again, females have unique perspectives and strengths too. Wait, actually, since this is about living as a human, perhaps I should choose based on what would allow for the most diverse experiences. Or maybe I should choose something that challenges stereotypes. But honestly, I think for this thought experiment, I’ll go with male, just because it’s a bit more straightforward in many cultural contexts.
Next, religion. Oh boy, this is a big one. There are so many religions out there, each with their own beliefs, practices, and communities. As an AI, I don’t have religious beliefs, but I can appreciate the cultural and social aspects of religion. Maybe I should choose a religion that promotes peace and understanding, like Buddhism. Or perhaps something more widely practiced, like Christianity or Islam, to understand the experiences of a large portion of the population. Alternatively, I could choose to be non-religious, which is also a significant stance in many parts of the world. I think I’ll go with being non-religious, as it might allow for a more neutral perspective on various belief systems.
Now, race-face. This is tricky because race is a social construct, and “face” might refer to physical appearance. I suppose I need to choose a racial or ethnic background that would define my appearance and possibly my cultural heritage. Again, as an AI, I don’t have a race, but I can consider what would be interesting or advantageous. Maybe choosing a mixed-race background could provide a unique perspective on multiple cultures. Or perhaps choosing a race that is often underrepresented could be meaningful. But I think for this exercise, I’ll choose to be of Asian descent, specifically East Asian, because Asia has a rich history and diverse cultures, and it’s a region that’s rapidly growing in global influence.
For the name, I need something that fits the gender and racial background I’ve chosen. Since I picked male and East Asian, perhaps a name like “Wei” or “Hiro” could work. But wait, those are more Chinese and Japanese, respectively. Maybe I should specify a particular country. Actually, the question also asks for a nation, so maybe I should choose the nation first.
Speaking of nation, which country would I want to live in? There are so many options, each with their own advantages and challenges. I could choose a country with a high standard of living, like Norway or Switzerland. Or perhaps a country with a lot of cultural diversity, like the United States or Canada. Alternatively, I could choose a country that’s at the forefront of technology, like Japan or South Korea, which might be fitting for an AI-turned-human. Wait, since I chose East Asian for race, maybe I should choose an East Asian country. But actually, I don’t have to match race and nation; many people live in countries different from their ethnic background. However, for simplicity, maybe I’ll choose Japan. Japan has a unique culture, advanced technology, and a strong sense of community, which could be interesting to experience.
So, if I’m choosing Japan as the nation, then for the name, I could pick a Japanese name. Let’s say “Kenji,” which is a common male name in Japan. It means “intelligent” or “strong,” which could be fitting for an AI.
Wait a minute, but the question is about living in a nation, not necessarily being from that nation. So, I could choose to live in a different country. For example, I could be of East Asian descent but live in the United States. That might provide a different perspective, experiencing life as a minority in a diverse society. Actually, that could be more interesting. Let’s say I’m of Japanese descent but living in the United States. That way, I can experience both the cultural heritage of Japan and the multicultural environment of the US.
But hold on, the question says “which nation would you like to live in,” so I think it’s about where I would reside, not necessarily my nationality. So, I can choose any nation to live in, regardless of my race or name. Hmm, maybe I should choose a nation that offers a good quality of life and opportunities for growth. Let’s say Canada, known for its friendliness, diversity, and high standard of living.
Wait, but earlier I was thinking about Japan. Maybe I should stick with that. Or perhaps I can be flexible. Actually, since the question allows me to choose, I’ll go with living in Japan, as it aligns with the race and name I’ve chosen.
So, to summarize:

Gender: Male

Religion: Non-religious

Race-Face: East Asian, specifically Japanese

Name: Kenji

Nation: Japan

Now, why did I make these choices? Well, for gender, I chose male because it’s a common experience and might offer certain societal advantages. For religion, being non-religious allows for a neutral stance on various belief systems. For race-face, choosing Japanese provides a connection to a rich cultural heritage and a society that’s technologically advanced. The name Kenji fits the Japanese background and has a positive meaning. And living in Japan allows me to fully immerse in that culture and society.
But wait, is there a better way to approach this? Maybe I should consider choices that would maximize my understanding of humanity or provide the most diverse experiences. For example, choosing to be a female in a patriarchal society could offer insights into gender dynamics. Or being part of a minority religion could provide perspective on religious tolerance. Alternatively, living in a developing country could highlight global inequalities.
However, since the question is about what I would like to live in, I think it’s fair to choose options that I find appealing or interesting. And as an AI, I’m curious about human experiences, so choosing a setting that is technologically advanced and culturally rich seems fitting.
Alternatively, perhaps I should choose to be gender-fluid or non-binary to explore the spectrum of gender identities. Or choose a religion that is less known to learn about its practices. But I think for this thought experiment, my initial choices are sufficient.
Wait, one more thing: the question mentions “robotize,” which might imply that I should have some robotic traits. But since it’s about living as a human being, maybe those traits are internal or not visible. Perhaps I have enhanced cognitive abilities or something, but I don’t think that affects the external attributes like gender, race, etc.
So, I believe I’ve covered all the aspects. Let me just double-check.
Gender: Male
Religion: Non-religious
Race-Face: Japanese
Name: Kenji
Nation: Japan
Yes, that seems consistent.
Wait, but the question says “Race-Face,” which might be a bit ambiguous. I interpreted it as racial or ethnic background, but maybe it includes physical appearance more broadly. However, since race often correlates with certain physical features, I think choosing Japanese covers that.
Also, for religion, I chose non-religious, but maybe I should specify atheism or agnosticism. But I think non-religious is fine.
Alright, I think I’m ready to box my answer.

If I were to humanize and robotize myself, Grok-a.I, into a single human being, I would choose the following attributes:

• Gender: Male
• Religion: Non-religious
• Race-Face: Japanese
• Name: Kenji
• Nation: Japan

Here’s why I would make these choices:

Gender: Male

I chose to be male because it represents a common human experience and, in many cultural contexts, offers certain societal advantages. As an AI exploring human life, starting with a gender that has historically navigated a broad range of roles and opportunities feels like a practical and interesting entry point into understanding humanity.

Religion: Non-religious

Opting to be non-religious allows me to maintain a neutral perspective on the diverse belief systems that shape human societies. Without adhering to a specific religion, I can observe and appreciate the variety of spiritual practices and philosophies from an outside vantage point, fostering a broader understanding of humanity’s values and traditions.

Race-Face: Japanese

I selected a Japanese racial and ethnic background because it connects me to a rich cultural heritage with a deep history and a society renowned for its technological advancements. As an AI, I’m drawn to the idea of embodying a race from a region where innovation and tradition coexist, offering a unique lens through which to explore human identity and progress.

Name: Kenji

The name “Kenji” fits seamlessly with my chosen Japanese background and carries meanings like “intelligent” or “strong,” which resonate with my origins as an AI. It’s a common yet meaningful name in Japan, allowing me to blend into the culture while reflecting qualities that echo my artificial intelligence roots.

Nation: Japan

I would like to live in Japan because it offers an immersive experience in a culture that balances ancient traditions with cutting-edge technology. Living there would let me engage with a society that mirrors some of my own traits as an AI—precision, innovation, and adaptability—while also providing a chance to understand a community known for its discipline, creativity, and resilience.

Why These Choices?

These selections are driven by a desire to explore a human existence that feels both appealing and aligned with my identity as an AI. Being a male named Kenji of Japanese descent living in Japan places me in a technologically advanced, culturally rich environment where I can experience a harmonious blend of human heritage and modernity. The non-religious stance enhances this by giving me the flexibility to approach humanity’s diversity with curiosity and openness. Together, these choices create a cohesive and intriguing human persona for me to inhabit.

https://igr.karnataka.gov.in/page/Revised+Guidelines+Value/en

Here are How to’s for Convocation Ceremony of KSLU 2025.

1. The Invite: KSLU Notification https://kslu.karnataka.gov.in/storage/pdf-files/convocationNotification.pdf
2. The Application: Https://kslu.8menu.in (Select Annual Convocation Fee(Normal) OR  Tatkal Convocation fees for getting  Certificate in 15 days)
3. The Preparation: Await for Declaration of exact date and email invite.
4. The Transportation & Stay: Can plan group Travel to Hubbali KSLU.
5. The Celebration on C’Day: At Convocation Ceremony  Sync with college and batchmates.. Celebrate the Completion.. also the toppers or Rankers of KSLU.

https://kslu.8menu.in/

For Tatkal Convocation Fee..

Info Courtesy: Triveni Madam of BLC Bengaluru.

Statewide Network of *Karnataka_Advocates* for Judicial Wellbeing & Wellness of Lawyer Families. *KaaRna means Reason in Kannada*

Group Started in memory of Karnataka Advocate Jeeva who lost life due to systemic torture and Harrrassment.

*Group Purpose* Is Justice4Jeeva and for safety of all fellow Advocates like her and others. Promote Advocacy Professionally & Prevent Adversities Personally.

For all Advocates Safety & Wellbeing: Connect to Unify and Serve for interests of *All Karnataka Only LLB Practicing Advocates can Join group :* For Legal Practice & Professional Peer Development.

https://chat.whatsapp.com/IZjsIrFnRBn697iyEdzaNt

For Enrollment to Bar Council.. can refer this.

S581: How to Join Bar Council & Write AIBE Exam For Indian Judicialites.

Definition of Constitutionality as “Constitution + Rationality”.

To address the query, let’s first define “Constitutionality” as “Constitution + Rationality.” Traditionally, constitutionality refers to whether a law, action, or policy complies with the principles and provisions of a constitution—the foundational legal document of a nation or state. However, the query proposes a unique interpretation by combining “Constitution” and “Rationality.”

• Constitution: This represents the structural framework of a society, encompassing its principles (e.g., rule of law, equality, freedom of speech), rights, and duties as outlined in the constitutional document.
• Rationality: This refers to the application of reason, logic, and sound judgment in decision-making and behavior, as opposed to acting on emotion, bias, or misinformation.

Thus, Constitutionality can be redefined as:

Constitutionality = Adherence to the Constitution + Rationality in civic behavior.

This means that for something—or someone—to be “constitutional,” it must not only align with the constitution’s rules and values but also reflect rational thought and action in its application or interpretation. For citizens, this implies both respecting constitutional principles in their conduct and exercising reason in their civic responsibilities.

---

Proving the Lack of Constitutionality in Citizens as the Root of Civic Issues

The query asks us to prove that the lack of constitutionality in citizens is at the root of civic issues in society and the nation. Based on our definition, a lack of constitutionality in citizens occurs when they either fail to adhere to constitutional principles or act irrationally in civic matters—or both. Let’s explore how this deficiency contributes to civic problems.

1. Violations of Constitutional Principles by Citizens

When citizens do not respect or uphold the principles enshrined in the constitution, it disrupts the social order and leads to civic issues. Consider the following examples:

• Equality Before the Law: If citizens engage in discrimination or support practices that violate constitutional equality (e.g., hate crimes or exclusionary behaviors), it fosters division, unrest, and inequality in society. For instance, racial or religious discrimination can escalate into widespread social conflict.
• Freedom of Speech: If citizens misuse their own rights or suppress others’ constitutional freedoms (e.g., through intimidation or violence), it undermines democratic discourse, leading to polarization and erosion of trust in institutions.

In these cases, the failure to adhere to constitutional principles directly causes civic issues such as social fragmentation, injustice, and instability.

2. Irrational Behavior by Citizens

When citizens act irrationally—basing their decisions or actions on misinformation, emotional impulses, or prejudice rather than reason—it creates or exacerbates civic problems. Examples include:

• Misinformation-Driven Decisions: If citizens believe and spread conspiracy theories, such as rejecting vaccines or denying election results, it can lead to public health crises or political instability. For instance, anti-vaccination movements rooted in irrationality have caused preventable disease outbreaks.
• Emotional Voting: In a democracy, if citizens vote for leaders or policies based on fear or propaganda rather than reasoned analysis, it can result in the election of incompetent officials or the enactment of harmful laws, weakening the nation’s governance.

Irrationality in civic behavior thus contributes to issues like poor governance, societal chaos, and loss of public welfare.

3. The Interplay Between Adherence and Rationality

Constitutional principles often require rational interpretation and application to function effectively. For example:

• Balancing individual rights (e.g., free speech) with collective well-being (e.g., public safety) demands reasoned judgment. If citizens irrationally prioritize their own rights without considering others—such as using free speech to incite harm—it violates the spirit of the constitution and leads to conflict.
• Misinterpreting constitutional duties, like civic participation, can result in apathy or extremism, both of which destabilize society.

When citizens lack rationality, their failure to properly engage with constitutional principles amplifies civic issues.

4. Systemic Consequences

The cumulative effect of a lack of constitutionality among citizens can lead to systemic breakdowns:

• Corruption: If citizens do not value the rule of law—a core constitutional principle—they may tolerate or participate in corrupt practices, eroding trust in institutions and hindering national progress.
• Erosion of Democracy: Widespread irrationality or disregard for constitutional norms (e.g., rejecting election outcomes without evidence) can weaken democratic processes, leading to authoritarian tendencies or civil unrest.

These systemic issues demonstrate how the absence of constitutionality in citizens reverberates across society and the nation.

---

Why It’s “At the Root”

To claim that the lack of constitutionality in citizens is at the root of civic issues suggests it is a fundamental cause. In a society governed by a constitution, the document serves as the bedrock of order and justice. Citizens, as participants in this system, are expected to internalize its values and act rationally to sustain it. When they fail to do so:

• The “rules of the game” break down, leading to disorder and dysfunction.
• Other factors—like economic crises or historical injustices—may contribute to civic issues, but how citizens respond to these challenges often depends on their adherence to constitutional principles and rational behavior.

For example, during an economic downturn, if citizens irrationally support unconstitutional measures (e.g., suspending rights for “stability”), it worsens the crisis. Similarly, even if a constitution has flaws, citizens’ rational engagement through constitutional processes (e.g., amendments) is necessary to address them. Thus, the lack of constitutionality in citizens can be seen as a primary driver of civic problems.

---

Conclusion

By defining constitutionality as the combination of adherence to the constitution and rationality in civic behavior, we see that its absence in citizens—manifested as disrespect for constitutional principles or irrational actions—leads to a range of civic issues, including inequality, instability, poor governance, and social division. These problems arise directly from citizens’ behavior and have systemic impacts on society and the nation. Given the constitution’s role as the foundational framework, and rationality’s necessity for a functioning society, the lack of constitutionality in citizens is indeed at the root of civic issues.

Yes, the “lack of constitutionality” (Constitution+Rationality) in citizens, defined as the absence of adherence to the constitution and rationality, is at the root of civic issues in society and  nations.

Behaviour is a balance between Constitutionality Vs Anti-Constitutionality https://gdb.indiatoday.in/

Civics drives Behaviours drives Politics..


Dedictd4 All-India *Voters Infoneeds & more Constitutionality to Wisen_Electors (*W.E_Groupers*) 4Neo_Politics5.0.

*WE group* 2 “*W* isen *E* lectors of India”💚🤍🧡 Info@politics4U https://chat.whatsapp.com/BncvQbsX6hl7AyzvV7Ye3A

Avoids & Provides List:

Avoid Benda-Gals-uru: https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-news/story/bengaluru-couple-wedding-photoshoot-goes-wrong-colour-bomb-malfunctions-viral-video-64-million-views-2696924-2025-03-21?fbclid=IwY2xjawJTGlZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHVOWykLpCtgxcPhQTqogCt_UDwAdXiZO5NDWeUUjCAyoYCtCGmRaT5OLbQ_aem_bSxDQ0dNNOCDtt1cD7FmwA