S1218: Rumours Detection steps by IN.DIAn Researcher GRP/Grok.

https://www-newindianexpress-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.newindianexpress.com/amp/story/states/karnataka/2025/Aug/11/iisc-researchers-develop-new-imaging-method-to-detect-tumours?amp_js_v=0.1&amp_gsa=1#webview=1

Inspired by above News, Like Tumours are manytimes signs of Cancerous Biologies, Similarly Rumours are signs of Cancerous Ideologies.. Detections helps in having a Healthy Body, misinfo too needs detection for Healthy Society.. Thus this endeavour to end asatyam by knowing Satyam..

Three-Step Process to Detect Rumours or Misinformation in Society

Developed by G.R. Prasadh Gajendran, an IIScian Alumnus, this three-step process—

  1. Information-Networking,
  2. Discrete Diagnosis,
  3. Investigated & Assessed Assortment—builds on the In.Di.A method and Trulse-Index concepts to empower individuals and communities to identify and counter rumours or misinformation effectively.

Step 1: Information-Networking

Gather information from diverse and credible sources to build a comprehensive understanding of the claim or narrative.

  • Objective: Establish a broad network of information to contextualize the rumour or claim.
  • Actions:
    • Identify the source of the rumour (e.g., social media post, news article, or interpersonal communication).
    • Cross-reference with primary sources like official statements, government websites (e.g., pib.gov.in), or peer-reviewed journals.
    • Engage with trusted communities, such as SAINTians or fact-checking groups (e.g., factchecker.in or smhoaxslayer.com), to collect perspectives.
    • Use platforms like WhatsApp groups (e.g., Wise-Electrs or SAINTians) to share and verify information with rational, truth-seeking peers.
  • Example: If a rumour claims a new policy affects Bengaluru residents, check official government portals, local news like The New Indian Express, and discuss with informed peers in a group like https://chat.whatsapp.com/C9zU4gcKP2L7DnEI3oY5Ks.

Step 2: Discrete Diagnosis

Analyze the collected information to assess its truthfulness, separating facts from fiction using a structured approach.

  • Objective: Evaluate the credibility and intent of the information to determine its Trulse-Ratio (Truth-to-False ratio).
  • Actions:
    • Apply the Trulse-Index framework: Categorize content as Yes (True), No (False), Maybe (Needs Evidence), or Undeterminable.
    • Check for biases, funding, or motives behind the source using tools like mediabiasfactcheck.com.
    • Verify claims against third-party fact-checkers (e.g., factchecker.in or pib.gov.in/factcheck.aspx).
    • Assess the logical consistency of the narrative using critical thinking methods like the Socratic Method or the CRAAP Test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose).
  • Example: For a claim about a health policy, review the manifesto or official document (e.g., via eci.gov.in), check the source’s bias, and calculate a Trulse-Ratio (e.g., 7:3 if 7 points are factual and 3 are speculative).

Step 3: Investigated & Assessed Assortment

Investigate discrepancies and compile a final assessment to share actionable insights with the community.

  • Objective: Conclude the validity of the rumour and disseminate findings to promote awareness and prevent misinformation spread.
  • Actions:
    • Conduct deeper inquiries into conflicting information using credible databases or expert consultations (e.g., academic journals or SAINTian community members).
    • Summarize findings with a clear Trulse-Ratio (e.g., 90% Truth, 10% Fiction) and categorize the information as True, False, or Trulse (Factition).
    • Share results with peers via platforms like WhatsApp groups (e.g., https://chat.whatsapp.com/K0b006XwUlA44ZrAfzWeOR) or public blogs to foster collective awareness.
    • Encourage accountability by reporting persistent misinformation to authorities (e.g., lokayukta or fact-checking organizations) or engaging in public discourse to correct narratives.
  • Example: If a rumour about a policy is found to be 20% true (e.g., partial alignment with a manifesto), publish a summary on a blog like grpvcare2dare.design.blog, detailing evidence and urging followers to verify claims before sharing.

Conclusion

By following the Information-Networking, Discrete Diagnosis, Investigate & Assessed Assortment process, individuals can systematically detect and counter rumours or misinformation. This method, inspired by the In.Di.A framework and Trulse-Index, empowers communities to foster a rational, truth-seeking society, aligning with the vision of a Safer India 2030.

Resources:

Published by G.R. Prasadh Gajendran (Indian, Bengalurean, IIScian...) Design4India Visions2030.

Advocate (KSBC), (B.Arch, LLB, M.Des) Defender of IndConstitution, Chief-Contextor for Mitras-Projects of Excellences. Certified (as Health&Fitness_Instructor, HasyaYoga_Coach & NLP), RationalReality-Checker, actualizing GRP (GrowGritfully, ReachReasonably & PracticePeerfully 4All). Deep_Researcher & Sustainable Social Connector/Communicator/Creator/Collaborator. "LIFE is L.ight, I.nfo, F.low & E.volution"-GRP. (VishwasaMitra)

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started