S1174: Spousal HeatMap 2.0. GRPgrok 2025

To incorporate “Fraud or Criminal Marriages” with a compatibility score of -2 and introduce a new spouse type, Type 6: Fakers-Fcukers, into the Spousal Matrix, we’ll extend the existing framework. The Type 6 spouse will be defined based on deceptive or exploitative behavior across the dimensions of Honey (intimacy), Money (finances), and Progeny (children/legacy). We’ll then categorize marriages involving Type 6, including a new “Fraud or Criminal Marriage” category with a compatibility score of -2, reflecting extreme incompatibility. Finally, I’ll update the heatmap to include Type 6 and reflect the new marriage category, ensuring compatibility scores align with the user’s request.

Updated Spousal Matrix with Type 6

The original matrix includes Type 1 (Giver), Type 2 (Sharer), Type 3 (Taker), Type 4 (Balanced Hybrid), and Type 5 (Independent). The new Type 6: Faker-Fcuker is defined as follows:

• Honey: Engages in deceptive intimacy, manipulating emotions or physical connections for personal gain (e.g., feigning affection to exploit partner).
• Money: Commits financial fraud or exploitation, such as hiding assets, stealing, or using marriage for monetary scams.
• Progeny: Uses children or legacy as tools for manipulation (e.g., leveraging custody for control or exploiting family reputation).
• Characteristics: The Faker-Fcuker is deliberately deceitful, prioritizing self-interest through criminal or fraudulent means, making them highly incompatible with most types due to betrayal and harm.

Updated Compatibility Scores

We’ll extend the 5×5 compatibility matrix to a 6×6 matrix, incorporating Type 6. The original scores (from the heatmap) range from 2 to 9, with higher scores indicating better compatibility. The user specifies that Fraud or Criminal Marriages involving Type 6 have a compatibility score of -2, indicating severe dysfunction. For consistency, Type 6 pairings with other types will reflect low or negative compatibility due to their deceptive nature, while Type 6 & Type 6 will be assigned a low score (not necessarily -2) to reflect mutual manipulation. Below are the updated scores:

• Type 1 (Giver) & Type 6: -2 (Giver’s generosity is exploited by Faker-Fcuker’s deceit, leading to emotional and financial harm).
• Type 2 (Sharer) & Type 6: -2 (Sharer’s trust in reciprocity is betrayed by Faker-Fcuker’s manipulation).
• Type 3 (Taker) & Type 6: 0 (Taker’s self-interest clashes with Faker-Fcuker’s deceit; mutual exploitation prevents total collapse but lacks trust).
• Type 4 (Hybrid) & Type 6: -1 (Hybrid’s adaptability struggles against Faker-Fcuker’s fraud, though boundaries may mitigate some harm).
• Type 5 (Independent) & Type 6: 0 (Independent’s autonomy limits exposure to Faker-Fcuker’s schemes, but no positive connection forms).
• Type 6 & Type 6: 1 (Mutual deceit creates a volatile, transactional dynamic with minimal trust, but both may tolerate it for self-interest).

The original 5×5 matrix remains unchanged (e.g., Type 1 & Type 1 = 9, Type 1 & Type 3 = 2, etc.), and the new scores for Type 6 pairings reflect their disruptive nature.

Updated Marriage Categories

The original categories—Harmonious, Adaptive, Transactional, and Challenged—are extended to include a new category for Fraud or Criminal Marriages. The categories are redefined to account for Type 6 pairings, with Fraud or Criminal Marriages specifically tied to the -2 compatibility score.

1. Harmonious Marriage

• Description: Both spouses contribute selflessly or equitably, fostering mutual support across Honey, Money, and Progeny.
• Pairings: Type 1 & Type 1 (9), Type 2 & Type 2 (9), Type 1 & Type 2 (8), Type 4 & Type 4 (8).
• Compatibility: High (8-9).
• Dynamics: Unchanged from original (mutual giving/sharing in all dimensions).
• Example: Giver-Giver couple prioritizing mutual emotional and financial support.

1. Adaptive Marriage

• Description: One or both spouses adapt to maintain balance, with minor tensions.
• Pairings: Type 1 & Type 4 (7), Type 2 & Type 4 (8), Type 4 & Type 5 (6).
• Compatibility: Moderate to high (6-8).
• Dynamics: Unchanged, focusing on flexibility in Honey, Money, and Progeny.
• Example: Sharer-Hybrid couple negotiating equitable financial and parenting roles.

1. Transactional Marriage

• Description: Prioritizes self-interest or negotiated give-and-take, functional but less emotionally connected.
• Pairings: Type 3 & Type 3 (5), Type 3 & Type 4 (4), Type 6 & Type 6 (1), Type 3 & Type 5 (3).
• Compatibility: Low to moderate (1-5). Type 6 & Type 6 is included here as both spouses’ deceit creates a transactional, distrustful dynamic, but not as severe as -2.
• Dynamics: Honey is conditional, Money involves clear divisions, Progeny serves individual goals.
• Example: Taker-Taker couple agreeing on separate finances and parenting terms.

1. Challenged Marriage

• Description: Significant behavioral mismatch causes conflict or imbalance.
• Pairings: Type 1 & Type 3 (2), Type 2 & Type 3 (3), Type 1 & Type 5 (3), Type 2 & Type 5 (4).
• Compatibility: Low (2-4).
• Dynamics: Unchanged, with imbalances in Honey, Money, or Progeny causing strain.
• Example: Giver-Taker marriage where Giver’s sacrifices are unreciprocated.

1. Fraud or Criminal Marriage

• Description: One spouse (Type 6) engages in deliberate deception or exploitation, severely undermining trust and causing harm across Honey, Money, and Progeny.
• Pairings: Type 1 & Type 6 (-2), Type 2 & Type 6 (-2).
• Compatibility: Extremely low (-2). These marriages involve fraud (e.g., financial scams) or criminal behavior (e.g., emotional manipulation), leading to betrayal and potential legal issues.
• Dynamics:
  • Honey: Deceptive intimacy (e.g., feigning love for control).
  • Money: Financial exploitation (e.g., stealing assets or hiding income).
  • Progeny: Manipulation of children/legacy (e.g., using custody disputes for leverage).
• Example: A Giver-Faker-Fcuker marriage where the Faker-Fcuker marries for financial gain, feigns affection, and manipulates family dynamics, leaving the Giver emotionally and financially devastated.

Updated Heatmap

The heatmap is updated to include Type 6, expanding the 5×5 matrix to 6×6. The compatibility scores for Type 6 pairings are incorporated, with -2 for Type 1 & Type 6 and Type 2 & Type 6 to reflect Fraud or Criminal Marriages. The heatmap uses Plotly with the Viridis color scale, where darker colors (purple) represent lower/negative scores, and lighter colors (yellow) represent higher scores.<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Spousal Matrix Compatibility Heatmap with Type 6</title> https://cdn.plot.ly/plotly-latest.min.js </head> <body> <div id="heatmap"></div> <script> var data = [{ z: [ [9, 8, 2, 7, 3, -2], [8, 9, 3, 8, 4, -2], [2, 3, 5, 4, 3, 0], [7, 8, 4, 8, 6, -1], [3, 4, 3, 6, 8, 0], [-2, -2, 0, -1, 0, 1] ], x: ['Type 1 (Giver)', 'Type 2 (Sharer)', 'Type 3 (Taker)', 'Type 4 (Hybrid)', 'Type 5 (Independent)', 'Type 6 (Faker-Fcuker)'], y: ['Type 1 (Giver)', 'Type 2 (Sharer)', 'Type 3 (Taker)', 'Type 4 (Hybrid)', 'Type 5 (Independent)', 'Type 6 (Faker-Fcuker)'], type: 'heatmap', colorscale: 'Viridis', showscale: true, colorbar: { title: 'Compatibility Score' } }]; var layout = { title: 'Spousal Matrix Compatibility Heatmap with Type 6', xaxis: { title: 'Spouse Type', tickangle: 45 }, yaxis: { title: 'Spouse Type' }, margin: { l: 150, b: 150 } }; Plotly.newPlot('heatmap', data, layout); </script> </body> </html>

How to View

• Save the HTML code to a file (e.g., spousal_matrix_heatmap_with_type6.html).
• Open it in a web browser to view the interactive heatmap.
• The heatmap shows compatibility scores, with -2 (dark purple) indicating Fraud or Criminal Marriages for Type 1 & Type 6 and Type 2 & Type 6. Hover over cells for exact scores.
• The color bar reflects the range from -2 to 9, with Viridis mapping negative/low scores to darker colors and high scores to lighter colors.

Notes

• Type 6 Definition: The term “Faker-Fcuker” is interpreted as a deliberately deceptive and exploitative spouse, aligning with the user’s intent for Fraud or Criminal Marriages. If a different interpretation was intended, please clarify.
• Negative Scores: The -2 score for Type 1 & Type 6 and Type 2 & Type 6 reflects the severe incompatibility of Fraud or Criminal Marriages. Other Type 6 pairings (e.g., Type 6 & Type 6 = 1) are low but not -2, as mutual deceit may allow a dysfunctional coexistence.
• Artifact Update: The new heatmap has a unique artifact ID and version ID, as it’s a distinct visualization from the previous one (ID: 170246b3-c1eb-4b1b-82a4-fcc1e2317b8c).
• Assumptions: Type 3 & Type 6 and Type 5 & Type 6 are assigned 0, and Type 4 & Type 6 is -1, to reflect varying degrees of conflict with Type 6’s deceit. If specific scores for these pairings are desired, please provide them.
• No Chart for Categories: Since the heatmap already visualizes compatibility, I didn’t create a separate chart for marriage categories. If you want a bar chart or other visualization comparing the categories (e.g., average compatibility per category), let me know.

If you need further refinements, additional pairings, a different visualization, or clarification on Type 6’s role, please specify!