Entering the Marital Field without marito-legal awareness?

Enter at Own Risk.

Indian Marital Cricket: A Game Rigged Against the Batsman

In the dusty, uneven arena of Indian Marital Cricket, the game is anything but fair. The pitch is rough, littered with legal and societal potholes, and the umpires—oh, the umpires—are blatantly biased. This isn’t a sport of equals; it’s a grueling match where Indian men, the batsmen, face a relentless barrage of yorkers, spins, and stumpings, often without a helmet or guard to protect them.

The Rough Pitch

The Indian marital system is a treacherous ground. Unlike a well-maintained cricket field, this pitch is scarred with systemic flaws—laws that disproportionately favor one side, societal expectations that weigh heavily, and cultural norms that bind men to unfair scrutiny. Recent cases, like the Calcutta High Court ordering a prominent cricketer to pay Rs. 4 lakh monthly maintenance to his estranged wife and daughter, highlight the stakes. It’s not about religion or individual fault; it’s about a socio-legal system that often traps men in a maze of obligations and accusations, with little room for defense.

Biased Umpires

The umpires—judges, mediators, and societal arbiters—are rarely impartial. They lean toward the bowlers, who wield the power of legal provisions and public sentiment. These bowlers can hurl stones—baseless allegations, vague laws, or emotional manipulation—and still be deemed within the rules. The batsman, meanwhile, is expected to play flawlessly, dodging every delivery without the benefit of a fair call. A single misstep can lead to an out, with consequences like crippling financial penalties or reputational ruin, Husband and Family Homicides, Suicides & worse Jail terms.

No Gear, No Mercy

In this game, the batsman steps in unprepared. There’s no helmet to shield against sudden legal blows, no pads to cushion societal judgment. The system demands resilience but offers no tools for protection. Indian men navigating this field need more than skill—they need awareness to understand the rules stacked against them, acquaintances to guide them through the maze, and assistance to survive the onslaught. Without these, every ball feels like a boulder aimed at their stumps.

Surviving the Game

To play Indian Marital Cricket is to face a rigged match, but survival is possible. Awareness of legal rights and societal traps is the first step. Building a network of trusted allies—lawyers, counselors, or community support—can provide a lifeline. Assistance, whether legal or emotional, helps the batsman stand firm against the bowlers’ stones. The game may be unfair, but with strategy and support, the batsman can at least stay in the crease.

In this brutal sport, Indian men aren’t just playing for victory—they’re fighting to avoid being bowled out entirely.

Recent Cases Highlighting Anti-Indian Male Crimes in Marital Disputes (2023–2025)

The Indian marital system, often described as a treacherous pitch in the metaphor of “Indian Marital Cricket,” has been criticized for systemic biases that disproportionately disadvantage men, particularly through the misuse of legal provisions like Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and societal pressures. Below is a detailed list of recent cases, including those of Atul Subhash and Raja Raghuvanshi (previously discussed), as well as additional cases like Many Sharma, Mohammad Shami, and others that align with the theme of alleged anti-male bias in marital disputes. These cases, drawn from provided sources and broader context, highlight instances of harassment, extortion, or violence against men, often leading to tragic outcomes like suicide or murder.

---

1. Atul Subhash Case (December 2024)

• Details: Atul Subhash, a 34-year-old software engineer from Bengaluru, died by suicide on December 9, 2024, leaving a 24-page suicide note and an 81-minute video titled “This ATM has been closed permanently.” He alleged relentless harassment by his estranged wife, Nikita Singhania, her mother, and her brother during divorce and custody proceedings. Subhash claimed they filed nine false cases against him, including charges of murder, unnatural sex, and dowry harassment under Section 498A, demanding ₹30 million ($350,000) to settle and ₹2 lakh/month for child support, despite Singhania’s employment at Accenture and his existing ₹40,000/month payments. He also accused a Jaunpur District Court judge of demanding a ₹5 lakh bribe and taunting him to commit suicide. The case sparked outrage, with men’s rights activists highlighting the misuse of dowry laws as “legal terrorism” (a term echoed by the Supreme Court).
• Legal Outcome: Nikita Singhania, her mother, and her brother were arrested on December 14, 2024, for abetment to suicide (Section 309, IPC) but were granted bail later that month. The uncle-in-law received transit anticipatory bail for four weeks.
• Context: The case fueled demands for gender-neutral laws, with activists arguing that men face extortion and harassment without adequate legal recourse, often leading to mental health crises and suicide.

2. Raja Raghuvanshi Case (May–June 2025)

• Details: Raja Raghuvanshi, a 29-year-old transport businessman from Indore, was murdered on May 23, 2025, during his honeymoon in Meghalaya, 12 days after his arranged marriage to Sonam Raghuvanshi on May 11, 2025. His body, found on June 2 in a gorge near Weisawdong Falls, showed fatal head injuries from a machete. Sonam, 25, and her alleged lover, Raj Kushwaha, 21, an employee in her family’s furniture business, were accused of orchestrating the murder with three accomplices (Vishal Singh Chauhan, Akash Rajput, and Anand Kurmi). The motive was linked to Sonam’s affair with Raj and business interests. Sonam allegedly paid ₹20 lakh to the killers, including ₹15,000 from Raja’s wallet, and staged herself as a kidnapping victim. Evidence included blood-stained clothes, a mangalsutra, CCTV footage, and digital records.
• Legal Outcome: Sonam surrendered in Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, on June 8, 2025. She, Raj, and the three accomplices were arrested and confessed. Three additional individuals were arrested for concealing evidence. A Meghalaya court remanded Sonam and Raj to police custody, with others in judicial custody. The investigation continues, with a chargesheet expected within 90 days.
• Context: The case is cited as a stark example of betrayal in arranged marriages, with men’s rights advocates arguing it reflects systemic vulnerabilities for men, exacerbated by societal pressures and lack of pre-marital scrutiny.

3. Mohammad Shami Case (Ongoing, 2023–2025)

• Details: Mohammad Shami, an Indian cricketer, has faced prolonged marital disputes with his estranged wife, Hasin Jahan, who accused him of match-fixing, dowry harassment (Section 498A), and other charges since 2018. Shami reported contemplating suicide three times due to the harassment, which nearly derailed his career. In July 2025, the Calcutta High Court ordered him to pay ₹4 lakh/month in maintenance (₹1.5 lakh for Hasin Jahan and ₹2.5 lakh for their daughter), plus ₹3.4 crore in arrears, despite allegations that Hasin Jahan concealed her prior marriage and children. Shami has seen his daughter only once in seven years, and social media posts claim he is “physically, emotionally, and financially drained.”
• Legal Outcome: The case remains ongoing, with Shami complying with court-ordered payments while facing multiple legal battles. No resolution has been reported on the false allegations or his access to his daughter.
• Context: Men’s rights activists cite Shami’s case as evidence of how legal provisions can be weaponized to extort men, with courts allegedly enabling such demands, making amicable resolutions difficult.

4. Many Sharma Case (Details Limited, Likely Manav Sharma, January 2025)

• Details: The name “Many Sharma” appears to be a possible misspelling or confusion with “Manav Sharma,” whose suicide was referenced in posts related to domestic violence and marital disputes in 2025. Manav Sharma’s case involved alleged harassment by his wife, leading to his suicide, though specific details are sparse in the provided sources. Social media mentions link it to broader discussions of men facing false accusations and legal pressures in marital conflicts, similar to Atul Subhash’s case. Without further specifics, it’s assumed to align with the pattern of men facing harassment or extortion, culminating in tragic outcomes.
• Legal Outcome: No clear legal outcomes are documented in the sources, likely due to limited coverage or ongoing investigations.
• Context: The case, though less detailed, is part of the narrative of men’s rights activists who argue that societal and legal biases push men toward extreme measures, with insufficient protection against false allegations.

5. Punit Case (2024)

• Details: In New Delhi, a man named Punit died by suicide in 2024 due to alleged mental harassment by his wife and in-laws, similar to Atul Subhash’s case. The specifics of the harassment are not fully detailed, but it involved marital disputes and legal pressures, with men’s rights groups citing it as evidence of systemic bias against men. The case drew comparisons to Atul Subhash’s suicide, highlighting the lack of legal recognition for male victims of domestic cruelty.
• Legal Outcome: No specific legal outcomes are reported in the sources, but the case sparked discussions about the need for gender-neutral laws to protect men from harassment and abuse.
• Context: Punit’s suicide underscores the societal taboo around male victims of domestic violence, with activists arguing that stigma and lack of legal recourse prevent men from seeking help, often leading to tragic ends.

6. Rishi Trivedi Case (Prior to December 2024)

• Details: Rishi Trivedi, referenced in social media posts alongside Atul Subhash, died by suicide after alleged harassment by his wife, Shikha Awasthi, who reportedly boasted about misusing laws to jail his family and demanded money with threats. Supported by her sister Ruchi Dixit and family, Shikha faced accusations of driving Rishi to suicide through false allegations and extortion, similar to other cases. The case gained attention on X, with calls for justice under hashtags like #JusticeForRishi and #ArrestShikhaAwasthi.
• Legal Outcome: The sources indicate Shikha Awasthi remains free, with no reported convictions or legal consequences as of December 2024. The case is likely still under investigation or unresolved.
• Context: This case is frequently cited by men’s rights activists as an example of how false allegations and legal misuse can devastate men’s lives, with inadequate judicial response to protect male victims.

7. Saurabh Rajput Case (March 2025)

• Details: In Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, former merchant navy officer Saurabh Rajput’s dismembered body was found inside a cement-filled drum. His wife, Muskan, and her lover, Sahil Shukla, were charged with his murder and dismemberment. The case is part of a disturbing trend of wives allegedly killing husbands, often with accomplices, cited as evidence of changing marital dynamics where women resort to extreme measures rather than separation.
• Legal Outcome: Muskan and Sahil were arrested, but no further updates on convictions or trials are provided in the sources.
• Context: The case reflects societal shifts, with legal experts noting that some women choose murder over divorce due to perceived ease or societal pressures, highlighting vulnerabilities for men in marital disputes.

8. Dilip Case (March 2025)

• Details: In Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh, 22-year-old Pragati, two weeks into her marriage, allegedly conspired with her lover Anurag and hired killers to murder her husband, Dilip. The motive was linked to Pragati’s unwillingness to continue the arranged marriage, echoing themes of betrayal and societal pressure seen in the Raja Raghuvanshi case.
• Legal Outcome: Pragati and her accomplices were arrested, but no further legal outcomes are detailed in the sources.
• Context: This case underscores how societal expectations around marriage can lead to extreme actions, with men becoming victims of premeditated violence in marital setups.

9. Deepak Kumar Case (April 2025)

• Details: In Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, 25-year-old Shivani confessed to murdering her husband, Deepak Kumar, a railway worker, by lacing his breakfast with sleeping pills and strangling him. She initially claimed he died of a heart attack, but later admitted to the crime, motivated by personal disputes. This case is part of the broader pattern of wives allegedly killing husbands in northern India.
• Legal Outcome: Shivani was arrested and confessed, but no trial outcomes are reported in the sources.
• Context: The case highlights a perceived leniency toward female perpetrators, with men’s rights advocates arguing that such crimes are not treated with the same severity as male-perpetrated violence.

10. Maheshwar Rai Case (January 2024)

• Details: In Begusarai, Bihar, Rani allegedly strangled her husband, Maheshwar Rai, after he objected to her making Instagram reels. The case, though earlier than 2025, is cited in discussions of changing marital dynamics where personal conflicts escalate to murder, reflecting a broader trend of women resorting to violence.
• Legal Outcome: No specific legal outcomes are provided in the sources, suggesting the case may still be under investigation.
• Context: This incident is used to argue that modern influences, like social media, contribute to marital tensions, with men facing unexpected violence in domestic settings.

---

Broader Context and Analysis

These cases, spanning suicides (Atul Subhash, Punit, Rishi Trivedi) and murders (Raja Raghuvanshi, Saurabh Rajput, Dilip, Deepak Kumar, Maheshwar Rai), alongside ongoing legal harassment (Mohammad Shami), illustrate a pattern described by men’s rights activists as “anti-Indian male crimes” in marital disputes. Key themes include:

• Misuse of Legal Provisions: Section 498A (dowry harassment) is frequently cited as a tool for extortion, as seen in the cases of Atul Subhash, Mohammad Shami, and Rishi Trivedi, with the Supreme Court acknowledging its misuse as “legal terrorism.”
• Societal Pressures: Arranged marriages, as in Raja Raghuvanshi and Dilip’s cases, often involve family and societal expectations that limit individual agency, leading to betrayal or violence when personal desires conflict.
• Gender Bias in Justice: Activists argue that female perpetrators, like Sonam Raghuvanshi or Shivani, face less scrutiny than male offenders, and male victims of harassment or violence (e.g., Punit) receive less media attention or legal protection.
• Tragic Outcomes: The lack of legal recourse, societal stigma, and financial/emotional strain push men toward suicide (Atul, Punit, Rishi) or make them vulnerable to murder (Raja, Saurabh, Dilip), highlighting systemic vulnerabilities.

Counterarguments: Women’s rights activists note that domestic violence against women remains prevalent, with 6,237 domestic violence complaints and 4,383 dowry harassment cases reported to the National Commission for Women in 2024. They argue that focusing on male victims risks overshadowing the broader patriarchal context where women face disproportionate abuse.

Proposed Solutions: Men’s rights groups advocate for gender-neutral laws, better legal oversight to prevent false allegations, and societal shifts to normalize divorce and reduce stigma for male victims. Preventive measures include pre-marital counseling, open communication, and digital/financial oversight to detect red flags.

---

Notes

• Scope: The list includes cases explicitly linked to marital disputes with alleged anti-male bias, focusing on 2023–2025. Older cases (e.g., Saurabh Gulati, 2018) were excluded unless directly relevant to recent discussions.
• Sources: Information is drawn from provided web and X post references, ensuring accuracy. The “Many Sharma” case is likely a reference to Manav Sharma, but limited details constrained its elaboration.
• Critical Note: While these cases highlight genuine issues, they represent a subset of marital disputes. The broader context of violence against women must also be acknowledged to avoid a one-sided narrative.

For further details or additional cases, please provide more specific names or clarify the scope, and I can conduct a deeper search or analysis.