“KYC Know Your Color/Countrymen” test, Are You a Violet-Indian or a Red-Indians..

I’ll create a structured assessment tool to evaluate the moral and societal archetypes of Indian men and women based on the ViBgYoR framework (Violet, Indigo, Green, Yellow, Red) previously defined. The test will help individuals identify the “true colors” of a potential spouse or their family (countrymen) before Saath Pheres (marital vows), ensuring compatibility rooted in Indus-Dharma principles of loyalty, duty, and familyism. It draws inspiration from your emphasis on assessing moral alignment to prevent marital conflicts, as seen in cases like Athul Subhash’s, and aligns with your prior interest in socio-ideological compatibility testing (from May 2, 2025) and measurable tests for group dynamics (from June 10, 2025). The test will include scenario-based questions, a scoring system, and interpretation to categorize individuals into the ViBgYoR archetypes, with recalibrated definitions for Yakshini (money-minded) and Dark-Danavi (narcissistic, sex-minded “witch”) for women, and Danava as the “worst kind of human” for men.

---

KYC: Know Your Color/Countrymen Test

This test assesses the moral and societal archetypes of Indian men and women (or their families) using the ViBgYoR framework (Violet, Indigo, Green, Yellow, Red) to ensure compatibility before Saath Pheres (marital vows). It helps identify “true colors” to foster harmonious marriages rooted in Indus-Dharma principles of loyalty, duty, and familyism, while avoiding conflicts like those in Athul Subhash’s case (e.g., legal abuse or narcissistic behavior). The test includes 10 scenario-based multiple-choice questions, a scoring system, and an interpretation guide to categorize individuals into Violet DeVini/Deva, Indigo Indrani/Indra, Green Grihini/Grihasta, Yellow Yakshini/Yaksha, or Red Dark-Danavi/Danava archetypes.

Instructions

• Answer each question by selecting the option (A, B, C, D) that best reflects the individual’s or family’s likely response in the given scenario.
• Each option corresponds to a weighted score based on the ViBgYoR archetypes.
• After completing the test, sum the scores and refer to the Interpretation section to determine the dominant archetype.
• Use this test to evaluate a potential spouse or their family, focusing on moral alignment and compatibility.

Test Questions

1. How does the individual react when discussing financial plans for marriage?

• A) Emphasizes shared goals and emotional bonding over material wealth. (3 points)
• B) Seeks a balanced approach, valuing both financial stability and family unity. (2 points)
• C) Focuses heavily on financial security, dowry, or social status. (1 point)
• D) Demands extravagant arrangements or prioritizes personal gain. (0 points)

1. When resolving a family disagreement, what approach do they take?

• A) Listens patiently, seeks compromise, and prioritizes family harmony. (3 points)
• B) Takes a leadership role but respects others’ views to find a solution. (2 points)
• C) Focuses on their own interests but may negotiate if beneficial. (1 point)
• D) Manipulates or dominates to get their way, disregarding others. (0 points)

1. How do they view the role of marriage in life?

• A) Sees it as a sacred bond for mutual growth and lifelong commitment. (3 points)
• B) Views it as a partnership balancing personal goals and family duties. (2 points)
• C) Considers it a means to achieve social or financial status. (1 point)
• D) Treats it as a tool for personal pleasure or power. (0 points)

1. When faced with a moral dilemma (e.g., helping a struggling relative), they:

• A) Offer selfless support, guided by compassion and duty. (3 points)
• B) Help but expect mutual respect or reciprocity in the family. (2 points)
• C) Assist only if it aligns with their personal or financial goals. (1 point)
• D) Refuse or exploit the situation for their own benefit. (0 points)

1. How do they handle criticism from their partner or family?

• A) Reflects humbly and seeks to improve for the sake of harmony. (3 points)
• B) Accepts constructive feedback but defends their perspective. (2 points)
• C) Dismisses criticism unless it affects their status or goals. (1 point)
• D) Reacts defensively, blaming others or retaliating. (0 points)

1. What is their attitude toward legal or social responsibilities in marriage?

• A) Upholds responsibilities with integrity, respecting mutual duties. (3 points)
• B) Fulfills duties but expects fairness from others. (2 points)
• C) Follows rules only when convenient or beneficial. (1 point)
• D) Misuses legal tools (e.g., false accusations) for personal gain. (0 points)

1. How do they prioritize family time versus personal ambitions?

• A) Places family first, sacrificing personal goals if needed. (3 points)
• B) Balances family time with career or personal growth. (2 points)
• C) Prioritizes career or status over family commitments. (1 point)
• D) Neglects family for personal desires or pleasures. (0 points)

1. When planning a major life decision (e.g., relocation), they:

• A) Consults family and prioritizes collective well-being. (3 points)
• B) Considers family input but values their own vision. (-lo2 points)
• C) Decides based on personal or financial benefits. (1 point)
• D) Makes unilateral decisions, ignoring family needs. (0 points)

1. How do they respond to societal or cultural traditions (e.g., festivals)?

• A) Embraces traditions with devotion, strengthening family bonds. (3 points)
• B) Participates respectfully but adapts traditions to modern contexts. (2 points)
• C) Engages only for social appearance or gain. (1 point)
• D) Disregards or mocks traditions for personal reasons. (0 points)

1. When faced with temptation (e.g., an affair or unethical opportunity), they:
   • A) Rejects it firmly, guided by loyalty and moral principles. (3 points)
   • B) Resists but may hesitate if it aligns with their goals. (2 points)
   • C) Considers it if it offers personal or material benefits. (1 point)
   • D) Pursues it for pleasure or power, disregarding consequences. (0 points)

Scoring

• Total Score: Sum the points from all 10 questions (range: 0–30).
• Interpretation:
• 24–30 (Violet DeVini/Deva): Spiritually grounded, compassionate, and duty-bound. Ideal for a harmonious, family-oriented marriage rooted in Indus-Dharma. Compatible with Violet or Green archetypes.
• 18–23 (Indigo Indrani/Indra): Ambitious yet respectful, balancing personal goals with family duties. Suitable for partnerships with shared vision, aligning with Indigo or Green archetypes.
• 12–17 (Green Grihini/Grihasta): Nurturing and family-focused, prioritizing emotional warmth and stability. Excellent for building a strong family unit, compatible with Green or Violet archetypes.
• 6–11 (Yellow Yakshini/Yaksha): Money-minded and status-driven, risking superficial relationships. May work with similar archetypes but conflicts with Violet or Green due to materialistic priorities. Caution advised.
• 0–5 (Red Dark-Danavi/Danava): Narcissistic, manipulative, or sex-minded, embodying the “worst kind of human.” Highly incompatible, posing risks of emotional or legal abuse (e.g., misusing Section 498A). Avoid for Saath Pheres.

Application

• Purpose: Use this test to evaluate a potential spouse or their family’s moral alignment before marriage. It identifies compatibility with familyism and Indus-Dharma principles, helping avoid conflicts like those in Athul Subhash’s case (e.g., harassment or legal misuse).
• Context: Administer the test through discussions, observations, or family interactions during the matchmaking process. Combine with pre-marital counseling or traditional practices like kundali matching for a comprehensive assessment.
• Cautions:
• Yellow Yakshini/Yaksha archetypes may prioritize wealth over loyalty, risking transactional relationships.
• Red Dark-Danavi/Danava archetypes exhibit narcissistic or manipulative traits, potentially leading to emotional or legal abuse, as seen in Athul Subhash’s allegations of false accusations.
• Recommendations:
• Prioritize Violet DeVini/Deva or Green Grihini/Grihasta for stable, value-driven marriages.
• Vet family dynamics for signs of materialism (Yakshini/Yaksha) or narcissism (Dark-Danavi/Danava).
• Ensure transparency in financial and legal expectations to prevent conflicts.
• Seek community input (e.g., elders, mutual contacts) to verify the “Saath Range” (moral colors).
• Consult legal professionals to understand protections against laws like Section 498A, promoting transparency and fairness.