Critical questions about the lingering effects of colonialism and coloniality in its various forms. It also challenges the continued participation of India in the Commonwealth of Nations and questions whose wealth is represented in this arrangement.
Below, I’ll frame 10 critical questions that could be asked by Targets and Victims of colonial administering, particularly from the perspective of India’s neo-generations, to interrogate the historical and ongoing impacts of colonialism. These questions aim to uncover hidden assumptions, challenge inherited narratives, targetted indoctrination, and provoke deeper reflection on decolonization.
10 Questions to Challenge Colonialism and Coloniality
- Why do we continue to glorify colonial-era institutions, languages, and cultural norms in our Socio-education systems, media, and governance, instead of prioritizing indigenous knowledge systems and language pluralism?
- This question challenges the lingering preference for colonial languages (e.g., English, European, Arabic.. etc) and Western (Euro-Arab-Greek.. etc) frameworks in Indian education and indigenous culture, which often marginalize local people, languages, histories, and epistemologies.
- How has the myth of Aryan superiority, rooted in colonial historiography, shaped our understanding of Indian identity, and why do we still accept these narratives in our textbooks?
- This addresses the colonial construction of the “Aryan Invasion Theory” and its role in creating racial and caste hierarchies, questioning why such narratives persist in modern India.
- Why does India remain a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, and whose wealth and interests does this organization truly serve?
- This directly engages with your question about the Commonwealth, probing whether it perpetuates a neo-colonial framework that benefits former colonial powers more than member nations like India.
- How do global economic systems, such as those dominated by Western financial institutions, continue to extract wealth from India while presenting it as “development” or “globalization”?
- This question critiques modern economic colonialism, where institutions like the IMF or World Bank impose policies that may prioritize foreign interests over India’s sovereignty.
- Why do we celebrate colonial-era infrastructure (e.g., railways, legal systems) as “gifts” of colonialism, rather than questioning the exploitative purposes they served?
- This challenges the narrative that colonial contributions were benevolent, highlighting how infrastructure was built to extract resources and control populations.
- How have colonial ideologies shaped our internalized notions of beauty, success, and progress, and why do we still equate Western standards with superiority?
- This question addresses the psychological impact of coloniality, such as colorism, Western-centric aspirations, and the devaluation of indigenous aesthetics and values.
- Why do we allow foreign media, corporations, and cultural exports to dominate our markets and minds, while undervaluing our own cultural and intellectual contributions?
- This critiques the ongoing cultural colonialism through Hollywood, global brands, and digital platforms, which often overshadow India’s rich cultural heritage.
- How have colonial-era divisions—such as caste, religion, and regional identities—been perpetuated to keep India fragmented, and who benefits from this disunity?
- This question examines how colonial strategies of “divide and rule” continue to influence social and political dynamics in India, benefiting external and internal elites.
- Why do we accept Western frameworks of “modernity” and “progress” without questioning whether they align with India’s ecological, cultural, and spiritual values?
- This challenges the imposition of universalist Western models of development, which may conflict with sustainable, indigenous ways of living.
- What steps must we take to decolonize our minds, institutions, and systems to reclaim our agency and build a future rooted in our own histories and aspirations?
- This forward-looking question urges the neo-generation to envision practical and ideological steps toward dismantling colonial legacies and fostering self-determination.
Addressing Your Specific Question: India and the Commonwealth
Your question about why India remains part of the Commonwealth and whose wealth it represents is incisive. The Commonwealth of Nations, established in 1949, is often framed as a voluntary association of former British colonies promoting shared values like democracy and development. However, its roots lie in the British Empire, and its structure can be seen as a mechanism to maintain influence over former colonies. Here’s a brief analysis:
- Why is India still part of the Commonwealth?
India’s continued participation can be attributed to historical ties, diplomatic pragmatism, and economic considerations. After independence in 1947, India chose to remain in the Commonwealth to maintain access to global networks, trade opportunities, and diplomatic platforms. Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru saw it as a way to assert India’s sovereignty while engaging with the world. However, critics argue that the Commonwealth perpetuates symbolic and economic ties to Britain, which may undermine India’s full decolonization. - Whose wealth is it?
The term “Commonwealth” historically referred to the collective wealth of the British Empire, extracted from colonies like India through resources, labor, and taxation. While the modern Commonwealth claims to promote mutual prosperity, critics argue it disproportionately benefits wealthier nations like the UK, Canada, and Australia, which dominate its economic and cultural influence. For India, the benefits—such as trade agreements or cultural exchanges—must be weighed against the risk of perpetuating neo-colonial dependencies. - Whose wealth are we?
This poignant question suggests that India’s participation may implicitly position it as a contributor to a system that historically enriched colonial powers at its expense. The neo-generation might ask whether India’s membership serves its own interests or reinforces a global order where former colonies remain subordinate to Western hegemony.
Why Were Our Parents Fooled, and Why Must the Neo-Generation Ask These Questions?
Your statement that “our parents were not fools, but they could be easily fooled” reflects the complex dynamics of coloniality. Many of India’s post-independence leaders and citizens operated within the constraints of a world still dominated by colonial powers. The allure of Western modernity, combined with the practical need for global integration, often led to compromises that perpetuated colonial frameworks. For example:
- Education and Culture: Colonial education systems were retained to produce “modern” citizens, often at the cost of indigenous knowledge.
- Economic Systems: Adoption of Western economic models prioritized industrialization over self-sufficient, local economies.
- Diplomacy: Aligning with global institutions like the Commonwealth was seen as a pragmatic choice, even if it carried colonial baggage.
The neo-generation, however, has access to global information, critical scholarship, and a growing awareness of decolonial movements. They are better positioned to question these inherited systems and demand accountability. By asking the above questions, they can challenge the colonial mindset that lingers in institutions, culture, and personal aspirations, paving the way for a more sovereign and self-determined India.
Final Thoughts
The questions posed here are not just intellectual exercises but calls to action for the neo-generation to interrogate the invisible structures of colonialism and coloniality. Decolonization is not just about rejecting the past but about reimagining a future where India’s wealth—cultural, intellectual, and material—serves its own people first. If you’d like, I can dive deeper into any of these questions, analyze specific historical or contemporary examples, or even explore how other nations have confronted similar colonial legacies. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!