“Netizen Users Spectrum” from Non-User to Neo-user to Moderate-user to Misuser to Abuser.
The concept of a “Netizens User Spectrum” ranging from Non-User to Neo-User to Moderate-User to Misuser to Abuser to Operators to Profiteers to Digital Kings to Digital Mafia offers a framework to understand the diverse roles and behaviors of individuals and entities within the digital ecosystem. This spectrum reflects a progression from passive or minimal engagement to active exploitation and dominance, aligning with the evolving dynamics of the internet, as seen in the context of digital exploitation by Big Tech, which we’ve discussed earlier. Below is a breakdown of each category based on general observations and insights into online behavior:
- Non-User: Individuals with no internet access or engagement. These are people excluded from the digital world due to lack of infrastructure, skills, or choice. They represent a significant portion of the global population, especially in rural or underdeveloped regions, and are unaffected by digital threats but also miss out on its benefits.
- Neo-User: New or novice internet users, often recently connected due to expanding access (e.g., via affordable smartphones). They explore basic online activities like browsing or social media, with limited awareness of privacy or platform dynamics. Their vulnerability to exploitation (e.g., data harvesting) is high as they navigate this new terrain.
- Moderate-User: Regular users who engage in balanced online activities—socializing, consuming content, and occasional participation (e.g., posting or commenting). They are aware of some risks (e.g., cyberbullying) but may not fully grasp the extent of algorithmic manipulation or data exploitation, making them susceptible to mental health pressures like those seen with Instagram’s influence.
- Cy. Misuser: Users who unintentionally or carelessly misuse the internet, such as sharing personal data recklessly or spreading misinformation due to lack of critical thinking. This group can inadvertently contribute to harm, like amplifying harmful content, as seen in cases of online radicalization or bullying leading to suicides.
- Cy. Abuser: Individuals who deliberately exploit the internet for harm—cyberbullying, harassment, or spreading hate speech. Their actions, often enabled by anonymity, can have severe consequences, as evidenced by the 2023 case of a queer Indian influencer in Ujjain who faced fatal bullying over a viral reel.
- Cy. Operators: Those who manage or moderate digital platforms, including content moderators or tech employees. They play a dual role—mitigating harm but also enforcing platform policies that may prioritize profit over user well-being, sometimes leading to burnout or ethical dilemmas, as noted in the exploitation of digital laborers.
- Cy. Profiteers: Entities or individuals (e.g., influencers, small businesses, or ad-driven creators) who leverage the internet for financial gain. They often face the grind of algorithm-driven content creation, fitting the Creatibor mold, where passion meets exploitation, as seen with Indian content creators struggling with erratic earnings.
- Digital Kings: Dominant players like tech CEOs or major influencers who wield significant control over digital narratives and economies. They benefit from network effects and data monopolies, shaping user experiences (e.g., Instagram’s algorithm favoring certain accounts), often at the cost of mental health or fairness.
- Digital Mafia: The uppermost tier, representing Big Tech corporations or shadowy networks that exploit users on a massive scale—data surveillance, misinformation campaigns, and unchecked power. This aligns with critiques of platforms like Facebook or Google, where profit motives override user rights, contributing to issues like suicides linked to social media pressure.
Observations and Implications
This spectrum highlights a gradient of agency and responsibility. Non-Users and Neo-Users are largely passive, while Misusers and Abusers actively harm the ecosystem. Operators and Profiteers operate within it, often under pressure, while Digital Kings and the Digital Mafia dominate and exploit it. The progression mirrors the capitalistic exploitation you raised earlier—platforms like Instagram push Moderate-Users toward Misuser or Abuser roles through addictive design, while Profiteers and Digital Kings profit, and the Digital Mafia entrenches power.
The lack of clear boundaries between categories suggests a fluid transition, influenced by platform algorithms, societal pressures, and personal circumstances. For instance, a Moderate-User in India might become a Profiteer by starting a YouTube channel, only to face Abuser-like backlash or Digital Mafia-like exploitation by platforms. This fluidity underscores the mental health toll (e.g., suicides among creators) and the need for regulation, as seen in discussions around the Indian Online Safety Bill.
This framework isn’t rigidly defined in official sources but emerges from observed behaviors and critiques of digital culture. It invites further exploration—would you like to refine it with specific examples or test it against your own experience?
GRP_VCare2Dare 