S693: Allegation Statement Types: Decode Words & Worders in life.

How to Know Loyal Sheepdogs by the Barks & Know Royal Wolves from the Howls &

Allegation Differentiation Problem. How to know if a Statement of message of accusation is True or False.

Expection of Truth = Intent + Personality + Context +Content +Connection. (EOT= IPCCC)

Identify the Patterns, to identify the Patrons or Automatons.

The Truth-Trust Cycle for more rationality .ie Truth Gets Trust Gets Truths  & The opposite is Lies-Doubt Cycle of irrationality.

Any thesis of text or voice can be  seen as a hypothesis (More Factual) that needs defence or verification and also hyperthesis (More Fictional) that needs deduction.

In our many roles and groups as admins we have faced and observed the Patterns of behaviour in members (90%),  (4%) Trollers & Con-trollers(2%) & (4%) Collaborators.

Have find these Equations for Ideologies that influence behaviour.

XYZism + Narcissism = TOXIC XYZism.

XYZ-ism + Empathism = Positive XYZism.

Eg. Capitalism +Narcs = More Toxic Capitalism, Wealth generated, held & distributed  inequally leads to disparity & Fractured Oligarchy.

Capitalism +Empaths = More Positive Capitalism, Wealth Generated, held & Distributed equitably(Not equally) leads to parity & Fraternity.

These inequalities create disconnect, discontent & Disputes in Groups & Society. With Mudslinging behaviour in members with blame-game.

Thus providing a Tool to test the Allegations & Counter Allegations in a group is important.  We propose the LEAD Statement Test Method.

1. L for Listen, Look & Learn Deeply from allegation, allegators & also alligators.
2. E for Evaluate, Every Point Eagerly with extended inquiry from 3rd party sources.
3. A for Audi Alter partum, or Ask for & Analyse the other sides explanation or defence.
4. D for Deduce, Derive, Develop, Deal, Decree or Design Solutions for the problem of eitger Misunderstanding, Misjudgement, Malice or malignancy.

Below is a Query answerd by Meta about types of allegations.

Many Allegations and accusations can be categorized based on their truthfulness and nature. Here are some types:

True Allegations

1. Factual accusations: Based on verifiable evidence and facts.
2. Eyewitness accounts: Firsthand accounts from credible witnesses.
3. Documented incidents: Supported by records, documents, or other tangible evidence.

False Allegations

1. Fabricated accusations: Completely made-up or invented.
2. Malicious allegations: Made with the intention of harming or defaming someone.
3. Misinterpreted information: Based on misunderstood or misinterpreted facts.

Half-True Allegations

1. Exaggerated claims: Partially true but overstated or embellished.
2. Misleading information: Based on facts but presented in a way that creates a false impression.
3. Omitted context: Partially true but lacking essential context that changes the meaning.
4. Mixed truths: Combining true and false information to create a misleading narrative.

Other Types of Allegations

1. Unsubstantiated claims: Made without sufficient evidence or proof.
2. Hearsay allegations: Based on secondhand information or rumors.
3. Speculative accusations: Based on assumptions or speculation rather than facts.
4. Retaliatory allegations: Made in response to a previous accusation or conflict.

When evaluating allegations, consider the credibility of the source, the evidence presented, and the potential motives behind the accusation.

Above is Queried from Meta.A.I while Edited & Presented.