Double Blind-Critics’ experiments for types of feedback mechanisms. Insights from group interactions with 4 of Baseless hurtful Critics and 1 Basised Constructive & helpful-Critic.
In our ideological daily lives we get to see and hear few of our silent supporters and many of our vocal critics. We also maybe indulging in presumptions with biased-basisless negative criticizing or back gossiping, mud slinging, dirt smearing and hurting others reputation or contributions.
Let’s go to & see the roots of this phenomenon of group defamation or community based Character-Assassinations.
The Identity of my dear messengers giving toxic feedback in conversation is hidden. This is an Academic exercise for collective improvement in group-messaging. If you have any complaints or feedback to give can give it personally to me in comments below or to my email. I welcome all feedbacks constructive and destructive too.
How to see if its “Blind_Criticism (Flawed_Bias away from Truths/Facts) or Rational_Criticism (Fair_Basis in Truths/Facts)?
Critic#1: Profile of message sender is Software Engineer from Bengaluru. Well-intentioned, well read, socially aware, bright intellectual and very capable and responsible individual. We are close intellectual friends. Our Ideas overlap in many ways.
One of my beloved and respected Friend and longtime Associate (He is a Dear good guy and most of time rational (Known and in communication since 5 years) but recently(since 3-4 months) has made multiple inter-linked false presumptions about me recently).
I trust he will understand me and my multi ideas-logies deeper & better soon. He had shocked and mocked me with this statement today:
2nd Msg Response I received to above statements.
Rational Analysis of this Response:
1. Members also have observed that you allow frequent violations esp irrationality & unsubstantiated allegations to facilitate your ideology/parochialism. (Call for Other members observations) who are the members when they conveyed and what are the details not given? (Strawman Fictional Arguement)
2. You have not removed them & not even stopped them. (Past history against some members also group has other admins too)
3. I comply with standard discussion rules. (Reference was to specific Group messaging policy rules this is irrelevant to specific group places). Lex Loci (laws rules apply as per location or groups)
4. Later you intentionally skewed the rules to suppress questioning & rationality. (Trulse and false accusation.. it’s maybe possible that rules were improved but untrue it suppresses questioning and Rationality. What it does is aids freedom of expressions with responsibility of impressions.)
Do review the group rules or Community Guidelines here below also known as Model Group Code of Conduct: https://bit.ly/3zMlXJh see it if “the 10 rules here Suppresses Questioning or Rationality?” In any way.. infact the rules are meant to promote freethinking & expression while protecting group against abusive messages and abuse of members-rights to Excellent-Environment. Btw Statistically the Friend also is common happy-member of 10 groups. He had violated our group-codes in 2 of the groups and was removed with valid reasons. We have cleared things to him he is always welcome back with group model code compliance, but member is arrogantly rebellious.
We many times hurt ourselves, others, our relationships and our communities by making snap judgements, with prejudices or misjudices there are implicit or hidden biases in the society which are very deeply ingrained and like back of our heads very hard for us to see directly.
There is a way of Fair Rational and Constructive Criticism and this is below.
Critic#2: a common alumni and very helpful altruist shared values and interest for our alumni campus community group.
Wonder and Survey to know more.
We got a feedback from member about Suppression of Questioning and Rationality in groups.. we are double checking with other members about this opinion. Plz do Express and feel free to suggest ideas to improve this Gmx Groupmember Experience.
Do note we are trying feedback mechanisms in group-improvement.. can contribute with valid suggestions to improve This-mitras group messaging services.
https://grpvcare2dare.design.blog/2023/09/24/s370-blind-unfair-critics-vs-rational-criticism/
Admins can practice this code and protocol: https://grpvcare2dare.design.blog/2023/05/09/s294-india-admin-assignment-protocol/
My personal guesstimate of Biased-Critic: Basised-Supporters and Blind-Supporters ratio in my circle is 10:1000:2 . So I’m happy.
From Critic#3 in one Campus -alumni group.
Cherry Picking: When People Ignore Evidence that They Dislike
Positive Fair Constructive Critic#4
3rd Roumd of Baseless and Personally Biased Criticisms.
The Causes: Most of these unfair criticisms are baseless and biased by exaggerations, all-nothing thinking, cherry picking and Attribution error.. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_bias
Another faulty-thinking and expressing is based on use of a psychological tactic called psychological Projection.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
Unfair Baseless Criticism 2024.
Case Study Criticism #4: This is from a New member about 2 months in a 4 year old group community of 198 members and had 17 admins, the newbie has an ideology that All Members have to be made Admins in order to make the Group be equal for all.. We had referred to the existing community guidelines and adminship requirements. This was a philosophical difference of opinion, now this was turned to adhominem by personal attack on admins & founder admin too. here is below tactic of personally attacking admin to enforce new ideas authoritarianly.
GRP_VCare2Dare 